Preview

Young V. United Parcel Service Case Study

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1063 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Young V. United Parcel Service Case Study
There is no denying that women have made considerable progress from the struggles and discrimination they faced in the past 50 years. However, women are still facing many obstacles in the workplace including unequal pay, sexual harassment, and gender discrimination. One particular challenge women face is the fundamental right to have a family. Having a baby is a joyous occasion for families, and most employers are more than happy to make the proper accommodations for women expecting a child. Unfortunately, there are other individuals who share the conclusion that ladies contribute less while pregnant, and that may contact the judgment that women don't work as hard as men. Pregnancy discrimination is an all too common and unfortunately growing …show more content…
United Parcel Service, Inc.” case, Peggy Young was employed as a part-time delivery driver for UPS. Although all drivers were required to be able to lift items weighing up to 70 pounds as an essential function of their jobs, the plaintiff's duties generally included carrying lighter letters and packages. After the plaintiff became pregnant, she asked for a brief leave of absence. Shortly thereafter, she submitted a doctor's note with a recommendation that she not lift more than 20 pounds. The company denied her request but also denied her return to work on the basis that lifting more than 20 pounds was an essential function of her job. Notably, UPS, as do many employers, provided employees who had on-the-job injuries with light-duty assignments. Additionally, the company regularly provided light duty or other accommodations to certain other categories of employees (such as those who had disabilities under the ADA and drivers who lost DOT certification and were unable to drive). Employees who did not fall into any of these categories were not eligible for light-duty assignments. Because Young did not, she remained on an unpaid leave of absence. She then filed a lawsuit against the company, arguing that the PDA requires employers to provide pregnant employees with light-duty work if they provide similar work to other employees in other circumstances. “The Supreme Court cobbled together a 6-3 majority to rule in favor of Peggy Young, a UPS employee who was not offered an accommodation by her employer when she was pregnant. The justices didn’t accept the broadest version of Young’s discrimination argument, but they certainly made it clear that nobody can be treated as she was by an employer without recourse to the courts”

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    LIT1 Task 310

    • 695 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Facts of Situation A as it pertains to the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 (FMLA).…

    • 695 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Due to the fact that the Plaintiff works full times, she is unable to drive her daughter to and from school every day and her daughter will have to be part of a carpool.…

    • 353 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Young v. UPS was about Peggy Young who was employed at UPS as a delivery driver. In 2006, she asked to take a leave of absence in order to undergo vitro fertilization. The operation was successful and Young had become pregnant. Young’s doctor had advised her to not lift anything more than twenty pound. The policy for her position at UPS required her to able to lift up to seventy pounds. Since Peggy was not able to fulfill her obligations at work due to her pregnancy, she was forced to take an extended, unpaid leave of absence since she had used up all of her medical leave. Peggy eventually lost her medical coverage since she was gone for so long. Young gave birth in April of 2007 and resumed working at UPS. Young sued UPS for being a victim…

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The EEOC filed suit complaining that FedEx violated Title I of the ADA by failing to provide reasonable accommodations and for discharging him in retaliation for his discrimination complaint. Additionally, the complaint sought compensatory damages (i.e., damages paid to compensate the claimant for actual injury or harms they suffered) and punitive damages (i.e., exemplary damages paid to penalize the defendant) for their alleged failure to act in good faith, and for malice and reckless indifference to his federally-protected rights under the ADA. The district court of Maryland awarded Lockhart the sums of $8,000 in compensatory damages and $100,000 in punitive damages, based on a jury finding against FedEx for failing to reasonably accommodate Lockhart under the ADA.…

    • 578 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The employee in this situation was out on leave for eleven weeks due to the premature birth of twins to the employee’s spouse. The employee was allowed to return to work in same position and rate of pay. The employee’s request to receive pay for the eleven weeks missed of work was denied. No violation was committed.…

    • 858 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The legal issue in this case is Penny Bachelder claims her employer, America West Airlines, violated the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 ("FMLA" or "the Act") when it terminated her in 1996 for poor attendance. Bachelder countered that according to the regulations implementing the FMLA, she was entitled to have her leave eligibility calculated by the method most favorable to her. Under a calendar year method of calculating leave eligibility, she contended, her February 1996 absences were protected by the FMLA, and America West had violated the Act by relying on those absences in deciding to fire her. The district court granted partial summary judgment to America West, holding that Bachelder was not entitled to the Act 's protection for her 1996 absences. Bachelder appealed the district court 's subsequent finding, after a bench trial, that, in deciding to fire her, America West did not impermissibly consider FMLA-protected leave she took in 1994…

    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    FACTS: Kevin Gardner (plaintiff) is a driver for Loomis Armored, Inc.(defendant), which supplies armored truck delivery services to numerous businesses that require secure transport of valuables. Loomis has adopted a policy for all drivers that their truck annot be left un attended. This policy is in the employee handbook and specifically states: Violations of this rule will be grounds for termination. During a scheduled stop, Mr. Gardner witnessed a woman being threatened with a knife by an obviously agitated man. Mr. Gardner left his truck unattended as we went to help the woman. The woman was saved and her assailant was apprehended. Mr. Gardner was fired by Loomis for violating the company policy of not leaving the truck unattended. Mr. Gardener sued for wrongful termination in violation of public policy. Judicial Opinion: The narrow public policy encouraging citizens to rescue persons from life threatening situations clearly evinces a fundamental societal interest….The value attached to such acts of heroism is plainly demonstrated by the fact that society has waived most criminal and tort penalties stemming from conduct necessarily committed in the course of saving a life. The court finds that Gardner’s discharge for leaving the truck and saving a woman from an imminent life threatening situation violates the public policy encouraging such heroic conduct. This holding does not create an affirmative legal duty requiring citizens to intervene in dangerous life threating situations. The adherence to public policy does nothing to invalidate Loomis’ work rule regarding drivers’ leaving the trucks. The holding to public policy merely forbids Loomis from firing Gardner when he broke the rule because he reasonably believed his intervention was necessary to save her life. By focusing on this narrow public policy of saving a human life, we continue to protect employers from…

    • 459 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mommy Track Case Study

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The mommy track has become a very real concern when it comes to women who want to have a rewarding career and still have children. Since women make up half the workforce in today’s society, the previous views or perspective that a woman cannot due both successfully has become a hot topic. Previously, it was expected that once a woman decided to have a child, she would have to switch to a part time job with little chance for advancement since she would not be able to devote the time needed to be successful as she advanced her career. Another possibility was that she would decide to leave the company altogether and raise the children as a full time mother. With women’s rights advancing and government protections being created for ensure fair treatment and equality among the sexes, making headway. It seems that there is a very real need to create…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Young V. UPS Case Study

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The question before the Supreme Court concerning the Young v. UPS. Does the Pregnancy Discrimination Act require an employer to provide the same work accommodations to an employee with pregnancy-related work limitations as to employees with similar, but non-pregnancy related, work limitation? (http://www.oyez.org/cases) Samuel Bagenstos on behalf of the petitioner argued that UPS violated the second clause of the PDA. To his understanding the second clause means an employee seeking accommodation or benefits due to pregnancy is entitled to the same accommodation the employer would provide to an employee under the same restriction, but is not pregnant (http://www.oyez.org/cases). He contended that the second clause adds nothing to the first…

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (n.d.). Pregnancy Discrimination. Retrieved March 14, 2009, from http://eeoc.gov/types/pregnancy.html…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    A truck drive was discharged for failing to make timely deliveries and not using the quickest, most direct route as previously instructed. The company warehouses and distributes wholesale floor covering products and operates from several locations. The driver was hired in November 2000 and during his relatively short, eight-month tenure with the company received a total of four other employee warning reports. According to the employer, the driver demonstrated a continuing pattern of failing to follow orders, company policies, and supervisory instructions involving the use of a global positioning system (GPS) mounted in his truck, completing daily driving logs, and utilizing toll roads for the best way to make deliveries in a timely fashion. On two occasions the employee simple failed to complete his deliveries, costing the company extra expense and a loss of customer satisfaction. The triggering even for his termination was his refusal to use the toll road to make a delivery even though he was offered an advance of the toll road fee. In response, the union claims that the employee’s failure to use toll road was justified because he was already owed $87.32 in post-toll reimbursements. One of the employee’s prior warning reports was grieved and settled in his favor, and he was disputing the remaining three at the time of his discharge. In this grievance he is challenging his discharge, seeking reinstatement with back pay, seniority, and benefits.…

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The courts have ruled that Title VII prohibits employer decisions and policies based solely on an employer’s stereotyped opinion that motherhood, and in certain cases fatherhood, are inapt with serious work. Courts have found the following examples of conduct violates Title VII: having one policy for hiring women with preschool aged children, and another for hiring men with preschool aged children; failing to promote an employee on the assumption that her childcare duties would keep her from being a reliable manager; and requiring men, but not women, to demonstrate disability in order to qualify for childrearing leave.…

    • 349 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, 2014).” Employment opportunity laws, frequently reviews the conditions of employment involving promotions, compensation, and termination. The policy is commonly located in the “Code of Conduct” section of the employee handbook Sarah is unable to perform her job due to preeclampsia. Because preeclampsia is a condition categorized by pregnancy- induced hypertension and protein in the urine, this disability is under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). The company would have to treat this nondiscrimination issues with Sarah the same way they would treat any other temporarily disabled…

    • 1944 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Such accusations from society are ludicrous; millions of women maintain a balance between work and nurturing their family, but they do so with difficulty. However, with birth rates only increasing annually, it is difficult to prove that working women are not doing their part as mothers. Unfortunately, women have hardly advanced in their fight for equality since "Backlash" was published. Though federal law now requires that all women receive at least eight weeks of maternity leave , mothers are still plagued by the problems of child care affordability. The article points out that the availability of affordable child care for the average working in women is fairly scarce. In 1993, it cost an average of $215-$329 a month to put one preschool-age child into child care. With the need for more child care facilities rising,…

    • 1228 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1976 in the case of General Electric Co. v. Gilbert, Gilbert is discriminated because she’s pregnant. The General Electric Company believes that they didn’t discriminate against women nor did they violate the women’s rights because there wasn’t any sexual discrimination. Although Gilbert claims that the disability plan from Title VII of the Civil Rights Acts was violated.GE Co. says that pregnancy is a physical condition and the verdict also claims that the disability benefits plan does not violate Title VII because it fails to cover pregnancy. Pregnancy was seen as a non-occupational sickness and accident disability…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays