Preview

yujgyui

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1117 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
yujgyui
Pitting Rainsford and General Zaroff against each other in the hunt allows Connell to blur the line between hunter and prey, human and animal, to suggest that instinct and reason are not as mutually exclusive as people have traditionally thought. Writers and philosophers have traditionally placed human intellect and the ability to reason above the bestial instincts of wild animals, which have no moral compulsions and act solely to satisfy their own needs. Reason, therefore, transforms mere animals into people and allows them to live together in functioning societies. Connell first blurs the dichotomy between reason and instinct through Rainsford’s friend Whitney, who asserts that animals instinctively feel fear and then confesses that Captain Neilson’s description of Ship-Trap Island has given him the chills. Without realizing it, Whitney admits that his perception of the island has sparked a sense of dread in him, just as perceived danger induces fear in an animal.
Connell further turns the table on the idea that reason exists apart from instinct by reducing the gentleman hunter Rainsford to the role of prey in General Zaroff’s sadistic hunt. Rainsford comes to realize that all creatures, including people, rely on fear and their instinct to survive to avoid pain and death, just as Whitney had originally argued. Nevertheless, Rainsford remains calm in spite of his fear and works methodically to evade death and even defeat Zaroff. Despite his desire to kill his pursuers, however, Rainsford keeps his perspective and continues to value human life, therefore remaining more man than beast. In contrast, the genteel General Zaroff reveals himself to be more animal than human by rationally concluding that people are no different from other living creatures and by ruthlessly hunting men to satisfy his inner bloodlust. Zaroff’s and Rainsford’s cool rationality and calculating cunning throughout the entire hunt belies the fact that each man acts only according to instinct,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    When people are put at their mercy’s wits, they will do some extravagant things. In Richard Connell’s short story “The Most Dangerous Game,” Sanger Rainsford is the person who deals with these things. The story focuses on Rainsford, a one time, big game hunter, and the events on an island that he swims to after falling off Whitney’s ship. On Ship-Trap Island, Rainsford encounters and is hunted by a deranged man named General Zaroff, who is a tall man with no heart, and likes to hunt more dangerous game. During the events on Ship-Trap Island, Rainsford is witty, exhibits extravagant survival skills, and encounters a revelation.…

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In Richard Connell’s “The Most Dangerous Game,” Sanger Rainsford is hard hearted and does not care about the animals that he pursues; however, when Rainsford is being hunted he realizes the fear of the prey, and his perspective shifts, therefore, he gains empathy for the quarry.…

    • 252 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Richard Connell’s short story “The Most Dangerous Game”, Rainsford is a man who is trapped on a island where they hunt humans. He begins the story as being a hunter and had no understanding of what the animals he hunted felt, but towards the end he understands what it feels like as he is hunted. His dynamic personality and behavior shows that Rainsford is quick-witted, talented, and level-headed.…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    For example, Whitney says, “I’d rather think they fear one thing- Fear, the fear of pain, and the fear of death.” At this time in the story Whitney is explaining to Rainsford how animals feel when they are being hunted. Rainsford doubts him and insists animals do not have feelings. He is being very naive about fear and does not think hunting is wrong. His view on fear and hunting…

    • 371 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    When Rainsford first meets Zaroff, Zaroff is courteous, hospitable, and honorable; he takes Rainsford in, gives him clothes, dinner, wine, and a place to stay. However throughout the course of the evening and dinner, Zaroff's character takes a drastic and radical darkening. "The weak [men] of the world were put here to give the strong pleasure," (Connell 799) says Zaroff over a glass of wine. "I am strong," (Connell 799) he continues to say. Zaroff hunted captured humans as a hobby and a sport! Rainsford is appalled at this, and Zaroff eventually continues to tell Rainsford of his intention to hunt him: "You'll find this game worth playing...Your brain against mine. Your woodcraft against mine. Your strength and stamina against mine. Outdoor chess! And the stake is not without value, eh?" (Connell 801). Zaroff is so corrupt that he doesn't even understand what he is doing is wrong; he appears so nice on the outside, but his words and actions show his…

    • 1308 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rainsford will not take over General Zaroff’s game of hunting other humans. For instance, when General Zaroff asks Rainsford to go hunting, he says, “Thank you, I’m a hunter, not a murderer.”(25) Rainsford classifies himself as someone who hunts animals, but not humans. He disapproves of General Zaroff’s game and most likely still does. In addition, while Rainsford is being hunted, he thinks, “The Cossack was the cat; he was the mouse. Then it was that Rainsford knew the full meaning of terror.”(31) Rainsford is truly afraid at this point just like other humans are when they are being hunted. He has had the horrifying experience and probably doesn’t want anyone to feel this fear. As a result, Rainsford is a gentleman and animal…

    • 134 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Zaroff starts to explain to Rainsford how hunting animal’s no longer gives him a thrill, but Rainsford is confused as Zaroff explains what type of creatures he now hunts. After a lengthy conversation at the dinner table, Zaroff gets to the point and says, “It must have courage, cunning, and above all, it must be able to reason.” (Connell). It is here where Rainsford realizes it is humans that Zaroff has moved on to and suddenly Rainsford begins to fear for his life. Zaroff wants a challenge, because all the men he is hunting are making it too easy, so he believes Rainsford will give him a challenge, since he is a hunter himself. Zaroff now makes a deal with Rainsford, “I’ll cheerfully acknowledge myself defeat if I do not find you by midnight of the third day – my sloop will place you on the mainland near a town.” (Connell). If he wants to make it off this island he will need to survive Zaroffs three-day game. Rainsford is sent into the huge jungle with no direction of where he is and all he has is food, clothes, and a knife. The game has now…

    • 854 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Richard Connell’s short story, “The Most Dangerous Game,” Rainsford changes his entire philosophy about hunting. For example, when Whitney disagreed with him about jaguars he said, “You’re a big-game hunter, not a philosopher. Who cares how a jaguar feels?”(Connell). Rainsford believes animals have no understanding of what is happening, therefore, it’s okay to hunt them. He doesn’t care if they feel pain or understand death and shows no remorse. In addition, when General Zaroff set the hounds to get Rainsford, he “knew now how an animal at bay feels” (Connell). Rainsford has to run away, set traps, and continuously risk his life to have a better chance at surviving. He felt the way animals do when they are being hunted and finally understood…

    • 158 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Sand County Almanac

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Leopold gives the animals and nature certain human-like characteristics in this book because he wants us to connect with them in a way we likely have never done before.…

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although Rowena was very ill at a very young age, she managed to have happiness in her life because of animals that has helped her push through the tough times in her life and to help forget about her illness as the author states, “Why do the rabbits have to be killed? Because they were hers.” (Findley 17). This represents how animals throughout the novel had a significance influence on the characters especially Robert and Rowena and the relationship between them. While in Lethbridge, the BSM (Battery Sergeant Major) orders Robert that he must shoot the horse, where another innocent life is taken. He is scared as he “stood there with his trousers open leaning in above the toilet with his hand against the bulkhead. Nothing happened. His bladder, like his mouth, dried up” (Findley 64), shows how he was unable to urinate due to being too afraid. Robert is very anxious and struggles to aim at the horse, “Jesus; for Christ’s sake die. I need more light, he said. He was shaking; his voice of full anger” (Findley 68). As Robert kills the horse, he has an image of a falling chair reminding him of Rowena’s death. This affects Robert in the war where mistakes cannot be made, especially on the battlefield. In one of the scenes in the novel, Robert encounters a coyote in a valley where it start drinking water from the pond. It then turns directly to Robert, acknowledging him then entire time. This clearly proves the type of relationship Robert has with animals, as he is able to somewhat communicate with them. Most animals would rush towards a human being once seeing them in their sight. Roberts connection with animals throughout the novel is a key representation and how animals have impacted him positively and negatively. Each of the animals he encounters always reminds him of leaving home and how the death of sister was the sole reason he decided to enlist to…

    • 979 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Connell makes the reader question the ethics of the characters driving the plot. For example, in the beginning of the story Rainsford can be seen having a very Darwinistic attitude towards hunting animals while General Zaroff has the same approach towards hunting humans. However, General Zaroff has lost sight of the value of human life entirely. He is blinded by the fact that he no longer is able to find game worthy enough for him to hunt anymore and is baffled by the fact that Rainsford refuses to agree with him. “The weak of the world were put here to give the strong pleasure. I am strong.”(Connell 18). This adds more conflict to the storyline while simultaneously placing Rainsford in a position where the hunter becomes the hunted. “I refuse to believe that so modern and civilized a young man as you seem to be harbors romantic ideas about the value of human life.” (Connell 17). At this point Rainsford is now really placed within an animal 's shoes and it is safe to say that these events have caused a drastic change to his mindset. This clash in ethics can be heavily associated with concepts of literary…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the story, The Most Dangerous Game, Richard Connell shows that Rainsford is regretful, anxious, and fearful. First, it is shown that Rainsford is regretful due to the fact that General Zaroff gives him the option to play the most dangerous game or be whipped by Ivan, to which Rainsford chooses to play the game. Rainsford tries again and again to fall asleep at night, but he is helpless with his choice replaying in his mind. “Rainsford could not quiet his brain with the opiate of sleep.” Second, Rainsford’s anxiousness is shown because he is uneasy about the thought of not being able to see the day after next. Although he is a marvelous hunter, there is a possibility that he may be no match to someone who is undefeated in assassinating humans.…

    • 236 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Darwin’s “The Origin of Species” is what he is tapping into. The ravine (and the two sides of the ravine) forges the connection between man and beast. Where animals simply act out of bare necessities, humans have a capacity for emotion with regards to their decision. Separately, the darkness and the strange moonlight provide for an eventual mourning of both man (the child’s cries) and animals (the panthers and their cubs). Again, the connection is forged. Robert’s is using “Do Seek Their Meat from God” to point to the connection between man and animal and more specifically, the panther and the settler. By the end the lines are blurred as to who the reader should be sympathizing with due to the…

    • 993 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Yet, they become more like animal than humans on the island later fighting and killing each other. Prendick must realize that their basic nature as animals has nothing to do with the form they were made into, but only emphasis their instincts. Prendick initially believes they are human but unintelligent. Later, he realizes that the difference is that many of the animals are victims of Moreau’s mad scientific experiments and that they must follow his “laws”. In the scene as Moreau speaks to the beast men as if he is God, Prendick narrates, “When I saw their wincing attitudes and furtive dread in their bright eyes, I wondered that I had ever believed them to be men in a fear that never died, fretted by a law they could not understand” (95). These statements illustrate the main differences between animals and humans- that animals are incapable of understanding. Human beings have reasoning and intelligence and the ability to assess their own actions and understand their world. In contrast, animals do not have this understanding and have no choice but to try to live as the world says they should. This gives human the ability to determine reality for animals, just Dr. Moreau does not do. By showing Moreau taking advantage of this ability, there is a message about the responsibility that goes alone with power and how humans should act towards…

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    yjhuukui

    • 730 Words
    • 2 Pages

    City of Bones is the first book of The Mortal Instruments series, set in modern New York, the series include City of Bones, followed by City of Ashes, City of Glass, City of Fallen Angels and City of Lost Souls. The sixth book, City of Heavenly Fire, will be released in May, 2014. The author Cassandra Clare writes urban fantasy novels for young adults. City of Bones is set in a present time. Clare was born as Judith Rumelt, to American parents, in Tehran (Iran), who soon changed her name to Cassandra Clare. Clare is known for her young adult fiction books, she is also popular for writing books such as; The Draco Trilogy based on Harry Potter, The Very Secret Diaries based on The Lord of the Rings, prequels to the Mortal Instruments series are called The Infernal Devices Trilogy , The Dark Artifices Trilogy, Magisterium Series (with Holly Black), and many short fictions to name a few; "Cold Hands", "Charming", "The Mirror House", "Other Boys", and "I Never". Also a movie based on City of Bones will be released by Sony Pictures this August 21st, 2013.…

    • 730 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics