Preview

A Civil Action

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
486 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
A Civil Action
Movies that are "based on actual events" are usually not the same as the real events upon which they are based. "A Civil Action" is one of these movies. The basic points covered in the movie are the same. However there were some key elements from the trial left out of the movie. These elements were some of the crucial errors made by Schlichtmann that led to him losing the case. The basic main events are the same as they were portrayed in the movie. The trial did last for 78 days in which the verdict of the jury was thrown out and a new trial was ordered. That led to the out of court settlement of eight million dollars because neither party wanted to redo the trial. Also Schlichtmann's law office couldn't afford a new trial. They were out of money. Schlichtmann's appeal of the case against Beatrice Foods depleted everything that he had left which resulted in him filing for bankruptcy. Al Love was portrayed well in the movie. He was the only W.R. Grace employee to come forward and tell the truth about chemicals dumped on the company's property. Despite all of these similarities there were more crucial differences. One major difference that was not portrayed was how Schlichtmann made several errors in the trial, failing to get evidence into the record and making a mistake with his expert witness on ground water, Professor George Pinder. It was Pinder's flawed testimony, which let Beatrice Foods off the hook. Another major distortion of the facts is in the movie when Schlichtmann boxes up all his court documents and ships them to EPA in Washington to be stored in a huge warehouse. The film implies that is was Schlichtmann's evidence that brought the EPA into the case. That is completely wrong. The EPA was involved from day one. It was the EPA and that state that ordered the barrels buried on W.R. Grace's property to be excavated. Al Facher never offered a $20 million out of court settlement to the families while the lawyers were awaiting the jury's verdict. One

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Throughout the book and movie their are many similarities that go along like how the germans interrupted the wedding between Schmuel and his bride to take the Jews to the concentration camps. While in the camp everybody was shaved, tattooed, dressed with old jail suits, and given a bowl with many tasks to do at the camp. The last major similarity between the two stories is how a handful of Jews were caught one night trying to escape and were sentenced to…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The most prominent change in characters is the personality of Virgil Tibbs. “Instead of being stretched out on the bench, he was wide awake and sitting up straight as though he were expecting something to happen. His coat was off and laid neatly beside him. He had been reading a paperback book up to the moment Sam entered...” (Pg. 15) This is almost identical to the scene where we are introduced to Virgil in the movie. However, the quick-thinking, cold and intense version to be seen later on in the movie was very surprising. The humble, clever and cool homicide investigator from the novel is much preferred. His collected manners also make it all the more enjoyable when…

    • 1016 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The characters in the novel and movie differ, yet have some similarities. There are the officers, Sam, Virgil and Bill, who are the same people in the novel and movie but have many differences. Some people in the book aren’t even in the movie or have different names which makes quite a difference, especially if they had relationships with people in the movie. For example, in the novel, Chief Gillespie is tall and well built, and in the movie he is short, chubby, and always chewing gum really loudly. Another example is Virgil Tibbs, he is humble and rarely talks back in the novel, “Sam took immediate command. ‘On your feet, black boy,’ he ordered, and crossed the room in five quick steps.”(15) But in the movie, Virgil talks back almost every single time someone talks rude to him, and he is also rude in the movie about some things. Sam Wood and Virgil Tibbs become good friends in the novel, but in the movie Sam and Virgil don’t even become friends, but Virgil and Chief Gillespie became good friends. In the novel the victim’s name is Enrico Mantoli and in the movie he is called Cobert. “Ten minutes later, the body of Maestro Enrico Mantoli was brought in.”(24) In the…

    • 847 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plaintiff, Roy Keane by his attorney, Walter Meier files his Complaint against defendants as follows:…

    • 622 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Two main differences exist between the movie and the novel. First, the book gives the reader more detail into Lester Burdon’s life. Lester’s father abandoned Lester and his family when Lester was a teenager. The movie mentions the abandonment, but provides no background. Lester also endured bullying as a child, and young man. The novel suggest these experiences in his youth led to some of the bad decisions made, first threatening the Colonel, and then kidnapping the Colonel and his family in order to force the Colonel into giving the house back to Kathy.…

    • 327 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Crucible, the movie, was made in 1996. Although it follows the same story-line of the original book there are many differences. In the movie, the first scene is Tituba and the girls dancing in the forest whereas in the book we merely hear about it when young Betty is sick and being examined. In the movie Reverend Hale’s wife is mentioned and Abigail accuses her of being a witch. Abigail visits John Proctor in jail with a plan to help him escape in the movie. In the book, Abigail never visits Proctor and actually runs away. Also in the movie, Abigail is seen stealing money from Paris which is not mentioned in the book. Many court scenes included in the book were not shown in the film. Like the first scene of the movie, most sets are filmed outdoors however in the book events take place indoors. Betty’s condition appears to be much more severe in the movie. She tries to jump out the window and is much more violent than described in the book. Tituba was whipped into confession in the movie when she was just scared into it in the novel. In the movie, John Proctor meets with Abigail to tell her to stop with the lies and to leave him alone.…

    • 304 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The had to make a decision on whether Bruno Richard Hauptmann was guilty or innocent…

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    For anyone who has read the novel and compared it to the film, it’s obvious that there are not any drastic differences between the two. You must be paying attention to notice the subtle differences. Quite a few of the differences that were found had to deal with the characters of the story; such as how they look and act. By far, one of the most noticeable character differences between the novel and the book is with Leroy "Curly" Branditt. Curly, as everyone calls him, is the foreman on the Mother Paula's All-American Pancake House construction site where all of the mysterious vandalism has happened. By Officer David Delinko he is described as being…

    • 1649 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Boston Massacre Response

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages

    After reading and analyzing, “The Boston Massacre Trails” I feel like the movie left out some parts of the trial that I found interesting in the article. For example, John Adam’s assistant in the trial, Josiah Quincy, happened to be the younger brother of the trial’s prosecutor Samuel Quincy. Another interesting fact was that Samuel Quincy was a loyalist. However, he was prosecuting against the British soldiers. Overall, I do think that the movie did a great job depicting the Boston Massacre Trials. However, I also believe that the article as more detailed and had more interesting facts.…

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Fight Club Movie vs. Book

    • 1423 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The flow and style of the plot line is almost identical, with a few scenes shortened to adhere to an acceptable two hours and many of the characters in the movie are a mirror reflection of their respective descriptions in the novel. The dialogue is adopted as a script and the only three major differences between the two stories are the narrator’s initial meeting of Tyler Durden, his final separation with Tyler Durden, and the concluding scene.…

    • 1423 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    With regards to the basic turns of the plot, the film is pretty faithful to the novel. However, when it comes to the complexities of the characters, the film sells the novel short. The film presents things in a very black and white manner, while the novel is all about the various shades of gray which exist in the relationships between the characters.…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Clarence Darrow

    • 1161 Words
    • 5 Pages

    There were people who believed in teaching evolution and on the opposite side were anti-evolution. The case was about Scopes, but Scopes played a little part in the trial, the trial basically turned into a circus. Darrow was questioning Bryan on his beliefs.…

    • 1161 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Psychodynamic counselling has a long history and vast literature to condense so only a brief overview is possible here – following on from the themes already discussed and with particular focus on four psychologists: Freud, Jung, Adler and Klein.…

    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A Civil Action - Movie

    • 2280 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Facher and Cheeseman, the defendants of the case, knew that the opposing side was not set financially. This gave them the opportunity to draw out the case as long as possible while Schlichtmann’s firm would be struggling to get by financially day by day. Not only to the defendants control the means of production but also they had professionals to clean up the “dirty” work that could possibly cause harm to others. This way it is even more difficult to find flaws in the company and reveal their mistakes.…

    • 2280 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil Action Movie

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In this movie, Jan Schlichtmann gets played by John Travolta as he goes through the life changing case with his lawyer firm. He had come up with this trial by parents calling him up looking for answers. These parents had one thing in common. They had lost children to Leukemia and they credited it to the water being contaminated by the pouring of a threatening chemical called Trichloroethylene. At first the reason to why he took this case was because he believed he could bring down two huge companies, Beatrice foods, and Grace Company. If he was able to succeed in taking them down, he would make millions of dollars for himself. As the movie progresses he realizes he’s doing all this for the parents more than for his own selfish reasons anymore and wants justice to be served. He didn’t win, literally lost everything, and the families won in the end as the plants were brought down.…

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics