Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

A Comparison of Marx's and Weber's Theory on Class

Better Essays
893 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
A Comparison of Marx's and Weber's Theory on Class
A Comparison of Marx’s and Weber’s Theory on Class by Mauricio I. Miranda Jr.

1. Marx’s Theory
Karl Max’s theory on class essentially is premised on the fundamental principle that human societies are divided into two classes: the bourgeoisie or the ownership class that controls production and the ploretariat or the working class that provides the labor for production. He said that human societies progress through class struggle between these two. He asserted that the system of capitalism or the “dictatorship” of the bourgeoisie is run by the wealthy classes just for their own interests. Eventually, he believed, the capitalist system would self-destruct and replaced by socialism. Under socialism, society will be governed by what he called “the dictatorship of the ploretariat or the working class in a “workers’ state” or a “workers’ democracy”. Eventually, socialism would be replaced by a “stateless” or “classless” society called communism in a process of socio-economic change, the aim of which is the toppling of capitalism through organized revolutionary action.(1) In a communist society, the concept of "..free development of each is the condition for the free development of all". A classless society will take place in which “human needs rather than profit would be motive for production. In a society with democratic control and production for use, there would be no class, no state and no need for money”. (2)

2. Weber’s Theory
Unlike Marx who viewed social class to be determined by a person’s relationship to the means of production, Weber believed that a person’s social standing is determined by his skills and education.
Weber’s brand of social distinction is marked by his three-sided stratification model in which he saw political power as interplay amongst “class”, “status” and “group power”. Marx and Weber though were in the same page when it came to the idea of social stratification, which to both were undesirable.
Marx believed that eventually, stratification would be gone along with capitalism and private property. On the other hand, Weber believed that the ideal situation for society is in providing “equal opportunity” within a competitive, capitalist system. (3)
Weber, a German, got most of his ideas on social stratification when he studied the social structure of Germany. He realized that social distinction is more than simply ownership of capital or being a provider of labor. He saw many member of the German society who were not rich but were politically powerful. He observed too that there were many Germans who were wealthy but lacked prestige and power because they were Jewish. (4)
To Weber, there are three independent factors that form his theory of stratification hierarchy: class, status and power. (5)
• Class: A person’s economic position in society. Unlike Marx, Weber did not see this as the main factor of stratification.
• Status: To Weber, political power is not anchored on capital value alone, but in one’s individual prestige, social honor or popularity in society.
• Power: A person 's ability to make people do what he or she wants. A good example is a politician or a government official who owns little property or status but hold power over others.

Theory That Best Describes Class in the U.S.
Of the two, the theory that best describes class in the U.S. is that of Weber’s. All the three independent factors that form his theory of stratification are present in the U.S. social structure namely, class, status and power.
a. Class: Corporate America is peopled with top executives who control and hold power over industries and firms that they do not own.
b. Status: There are many well-known writers, artists, educators, media personalities in America that hold great influence but not much economic worth.
c. Power: The world’s most powerful person, the President of the United States, may have little property but has great power over the fate of people all over the world as Commander in Chief of the world’s mightiest armed forces.

Which Theory Works Best? The position of this paper find the Weberian Theory works best in so far as American society is concerned. All the elements of Weber’s theory of stratification are present in America and are the norms when it comes to classifying its social structures. In the economic front for instance, investments, a form of capitalism, is what is sustaining the American way of life. Today, it appears to be the effective economic model in sustaining majority of other countries of the world. Even former die-hard communist countries such as China and Russia have embraced it as well.
In conclusion, we are in agreement with the proponents of capitalism who attest that it is the greatest wealth-producing system known to man which benefits mainly the ordinary person. (6)
References
1. Craig J. Calhoun (2002). Classical Sociological Theory Wiley-Blackwell.
ISBN 978-0-631-21348-2.
2. Marx, Karl and Engels, Friedrick. “Manifesto of the Communist Party”. Selected
Works. Volume 1; London 1943
3. Jones, Helen (1997). Towards a classless society? Psychology Press. ISBN 978-0-415-15331-7
4. Leander, Anna (2001) “class, Weberian approaches to”. In Jones, R.J. Barry. Routledge Encyclopedia of International Political Economy, Entries A-F. Taylor and Francis. ISBN 978-0-415-24350-6
5. Stark, Rodney (2007). Sociology (Tenth Edition ed.) Thomson Wadsworth
6. Friedman, Milton. Capitalism and freedom. (Chicago): University of Chicago 1962.

References: 1. Craig J. Calhoun (2002). Classical Sociological Theory Wiley-Blackwell. ISBN 978-0-631-21348-2. 2. Marx, Karl and Engels, Friedrick. “Manifesto of the Communist Party”. Selected Works. Volume 1; London 1943 3. Jones, Helen (1997). Towards a classless society? Psychology Press. ISBN 978-0-415-15331-7 4. Leander, Anna (2001) “class, Weberian approaches to”. In Jones, R.J. Barry. Routledge Encyclopedia of International Political Economy, Entries A-F. Taylor and Francis. ISBN 978-0-415-24350-6 5. Stark, Rodney (2007). Sociology (Tenth Edition ed.) Thomson Wadsworth 6. Friedman, Milton. Capitalism and freedom. (Chicago): University of Chicago 1962.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Comparing and contrasting Marx and Weber we see that their theoretical approaches seem to be completely different at first. However, we notice subtle similarities in their theoretical approaches that makes the consequences of their arguments. Marx and Weber apply their concept of specialization…

    • 235 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Max Weber's observations and conclusions regarding modernity and its causes have named him one of the most influential sociologists of our era. Weber believed that in the West rationality had come to become the predominant impetus for action. Weber said that Rationality was one of four motivations towards actions--the remaining three, Traditional, Affective, and Value-Oriented, had been based on more humanistic qualities and had all faded into almost insignificance in the modern age. He thought that this change in stimulus had led to men becoming dehumanised, trapped in the 'iron cage' of production and bureaucracy. Weber's writings sought to understand why Capitalism had come to predominate in the West, rather than other parts of the world, and to examine the different aspects of such a society. Weber argued that sociology was inevitably a subjective science that was dominated by the importance of the individual; this belief led him to employ very unique methods of analysis.…

    • 1754 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Class in Australia

    • 777 Words
    • 3 Pages

    * Weber: Believed class position > determined by person's skills/education rather than by their relationship to means of production. Marx & Weber agreed social stratification was undesirable, however where Marx believed stratification would disappear along with capitalism/private property. Weber believe solution lay in providing "equal opportunity" within competitive/capitalist system…

    • 777 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Classic sociologist Max Weber was strongly influenced by Marx's ideas, but rejected the possibility of effective communism, arguing that it would require an even greater level of detrimental social control and bureaucratization than capitalist society. Weber developed the three-component theory of stratification and the concept of life chances. Weber supposed there were more class divisions than Marx suggested, taking different concepts from both functionalist and Marxist theories to create his own system. Weber claimed there are four main classes: the upper class, the white-collar workers, the petite bourgeoisie, and the manual working class. Weber's theory more closely resembles theories of modern Western class structures embraced by sociologists, although economic status does not seem to depend strictly on earnings in the way Weber envisioned.…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pyschology

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages

    3 Which sociologist maintained that a person\'s position in a stratification system reflects some combination of their class, status, and power? Answer Max Weber Ralf Dahrendorf Gerhard Lenski Karl Marx…

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Instead they argue that social stratification benefits some at the expense of others. Two theorists, Karl Marx and Max Weber, are the primary contributors to this perception. Karl Marx was a German philosopher, sociologist, economist, and revolutionary socialist (Biography). He based his theory on the idea that society has two classes of people: the bourgeoisie and the proletariat. The bourgeoisie are the holders of the means of manufacturing, like factories and mills, while the proletariat are the workers. Marx argued that the bourgeoisie give proletariats just enough pay to survive, but ultimately the workers are exploited (Plummer).…

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Karl Marx, Emile Durkheim, Max Weber and Georg Simmel are the dominant classical voices when studying or analyzing the rise of civilization from a more cooperative, collective feudal social order to a modern capitalistic society. All four of these sociological philosophers contributed to the contemporary understanding of the nature of society and social change. Each of them eventually surmised that economic conditions directly influenced the relationship between individuals and their fellows, and individuals and their world. Although they had differences in their viewpoints, they were acutely concerned with the evolving market society and its effect on human interaction. Marx developed his concept of “alienation”, Durkheim expressed thoughts on social solidarity, Weber and Simmel emphasized how the emergence of capitalism affected the way people think, making the rational calculation of means and ends more ubiquitous and placing significant importance on rationalism and disenchantment. The outcome for the modern citizen was not naturally grounded in humanitarianism…

    • 3246 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aware that money or capital also has a large role in the distribution of power, Weber discusses how economic status relates to class. To determine class he used the following three principles: "when (1) a number of people have in common a specific causal component of their life chances, in so far as (2) this component is represented exclusively by economic interests in the possession of goods and opportunities for income, and (3) is represented under the conditions of the commodity or labour markets"(p. 104). Simply put, a person's class is determined by what choices that person or community has in order to sustain comfortable means of living and property is the basic category that Weber believes defines class situation. Class is created through the economic situation of different portions of society, but for Weber, it is an abstraction and can perform no actions of its own; this is where status and party groups come into play.…

    • 855 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He also had influences that shaped the way in he thought of and saw the world one of them being Marx because he always found ways to either agree or disagree with Marx’s theories, an instance of this is when both theorists are arguing about class. Similar to Marx, Weber saw class as economically determined. He believed society was split between owners and laborers. Status, on the other hand, was based on noneconomic factors such as education, connection, and religion. Both status and class determined an individual’s power, or influence over concepts. Unlike Marx, Weber thought that these individuals understanding of one another and the world they formed the base of a stable society. For weber a rational society is one built around logic and efficiency rather than morality or tradition. To Weber, capitalism is entirely rational. Although this leads to productivity and merit-based success, it can have adverse effects when taken to the extreme. Weber was also unlike his predecessors was more interested in how individuals experienced societal divisions than in the…

    • 886 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Introduction In the broad project of ‘class analysis’ a great deal of effort goes into defining class and delineating the boundaries of classes. This is necessarily so, because class analysis is ‘the empirical investigation of the consequences and corollaries of the existence of a class structure defined ex-ante’ (Breen and Rottman 1995b, p. 453). By starting from a particular definition, sociologists can assess the extent to which such things as inequality in life chances among individuals and families are structured on the basis of class. This approach stands in contrast to one that discovers a class structure from the empirical distribution of inequality in society (Sørenson 2000 labels this the ‘nominal classifications’ approach). In class analysis the theoretical underpinnings of the version of class that is being used have to be made clear at the outset, and the concept of class has to be operationalized so as to allow claims about class to be tested empirically. If we examine the two main varieties of contemporary class analysis – namely Marxist class analysis, particularly associated with the work of Erik Olin Wright and his associates, and the neo-Weberian class analysis linked to the use of the class schema devised by John Goldthorpe – we find that these two tasks are central to both. In this chapter I will discuss some of the issues involved in seeking to pursue class analysis within a broadly Weberian perspective. I begin by outlining Weber’s own views on social class, as these are presented in Economy and Society. This serves to set out the broad parameters within which Weberian class analysis operates and to suggest the extent and limits of its explanatory ambitions. I go on to discuss, in very general terms, what sort of operationalization of class is suggested by the work of Weber and then to outline the Goldthorpe class schema, which is widely held to be Weberian in conception…

    • 9107 Words
    • 37 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Max Weber (1864–1920) examined the reasons why people in present-day Western societies behave on the basis of intellectually thinking about issues, rather than relying on customs and traditions to resolve or confront them.…

    • 1322 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    testing

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Such as status groups, classes and ranks. Two of the most well known sociologists Max Weber (1864-1920) and Karl Marx (1818-1883) studied the concepts of stratification and class in great detail, many of their ideas still have profound influences on people studying sociology today, in this, the modern society.…

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Karl Marx was a sociologist, economist, and author of “The Communist Manifesto,” which is still, to this day, the most famous piece of literature related to socialism written. His work laid the foundation for other leaders in communism such as Vladimir Lenin. One of the theories Karl Marx is most known for is Marxism; Marxism is, in short, a system of socialism where the prominent feature is the public ownership of the means of production, distribution, and exchange. With capitalism, the public only own their ability to work, and then, in return, sell their own labor. Marx believes a class is defined by the relation of its members to the means of production, and that the struggle of the classes is embedded in history.…

    • 296 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    working class

    • 1712 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Weber defined a class as a group of people sharing similar position in the market economy and receiving similar economic rewards and argued that a person’s class situation is basically their market situation where people sharing a similar class situation also share similar life chances. For Weber, status is also important but things like ‘property’ are not always recognized as status qualification. Therefore, people in same class situation would be not necessary in the same status group. Importantly, the existence of different status group within a class can weaken class solidarity and potential for consciousness.…

    • 1712 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Weber used comparative sociology to understand variance in society. He studied the difference in cultures that explained the different social orderings that emerged. From his work ‘A Protestant Ethic’, Weber acknowledges that religion can be a cause for societal change and a social structure imbued with religious influences and values can in turn influence the individual’s that inhabit such a society. For example Weber takes the Calvinist and Lutheran faiths and suggests that the are the mother and father of modern capitalism. With such strong beliefs in the Calvinist faith such as predestination (that those chosen for salvation were chosen before birth) Weber suggested this was a cause for uneasiness and indifference amongst the Calvinist as everyone wanted salvation. To acquire this they would strive to be worldly successful, in the belief that the successful would surely be those amongst the salvaged.Calvinists turned to labour to achieve success. Lutheranism beliefs stated that there was a calling in life and this calling was what the believer devoted their lives to, this calling for many was the life of labour. Weber suggested that these beliefs were the beginnings of a labour filled life that was the beginning of capitalism. According to Weber, religion’s strong foothold in society necessitated the search for success and salvation. The structure of society at the time with its essential features such as religion and its belief system had large affects for those individuals who occupied it such as the Calvinists and Lutherans. By using his sociological imagination Weber demonstrated the affect social structure had on the personal experiences of the…

    • 1726 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays