Preview

A. Explain Why the House of Lords Rejected the 1909 Budget.

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
619 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
A. Explain Why the House of Lords Rejected the 1909 Budget.
The House of Lords in 1909 consisted mainly of aristocrats that where part of the conservative party. There are many different reasons for the rejection of the people’s budget, which was an idea, brought forward by David Lloyd George of the Liberal party. The swift rejection by the House of Lords sparked the first constitutional crisis of the 20th century.
The first reason I am going to bring forward is that this new budget included the idea of taxation on the rich for money that would go to support the poor. A position in the House of Lords was inherited; this meant that the peers in the House of Lords were all relations with inherited wealth. This meant that the people the Budget targeted included the peers in the House of Lords; they did not feel it was fair to have their money taxed of them and saw it as an attack on them by the Liberals. So they rejected this budget so they wouldn’t be taxed. The peers believed that this budget was unfair on them ‘These (land) taxes are justifiable if you believe that land is national property’ however they did not believe this, they believed that the land they owned was theirs and no one should be able to take it from them as, that, they said could be seen as stealing- therefore they had hostility towards the new budget. This budget not only taxed them directly but indirectly to, David Lloyd George also wanted to put taxes on luxury goods such as motor cars and beer. This luxury goods tax also hit the wealthy; they didn’t think the poor should be getting their money because they thought the lower class were poor because they were lazy (they believed in self-help), therefore they did not think the lower classes deserved to be given their money because they were not doing anything to be worthy of it. Another reason is that the House of Lords felt that the Budget was too controversial; they thought that Lloyd George had other

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    One argument for is that the cabinet includes more than one political party, this means that the Prime Minister has to confer, with other MP’s and with the other party in the coalition, on all matters. This limits the patronage and decision-making power of the Prime Minister, and that he/ she has to share their power with another party, in order to come to a decision that both parties are happy with. An example of this was when the Conservatives and the Liberal Democrats had to discuss the annual Spending Review and decide which taxes they should raise and cut. This led to both parties wanting to cut different taxes, which the other party wanted to raise, such as housing. If only one party was in government and the one Prime Minister had all the power, then they would have been able to cut and raise the taxes they wanted to, but being in a coalition meant that they had to come to a group agreement, where both parties weren’t entirely happy. This argument is quite strong because if the Prime Minister has to share his/ her powers it means it is harder for the cabinet to come to a decision, however it does lead to the decision being fairer and appealing to a wider range of the population.…

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The rejection of constitutionalism by Charles I’s sour relationship with the Parliament and Oliver Cromwell’s dissolving of Parliament, along with the acceptance of constitutionalism through the Glorious Revolution during the reign of William and Mary all resulted in a strong English power and newly reinforced parliamentary rights.…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The time for a new government came about in times of fear, many men such as William Livingston wondered “if the republic could even survive another decade” for Henry Knox made an excellent point in declaring “Our present federal government is a name, a shadow, without power, or effect”. Meantime the relationship between the states was poor and there was an uncertainty if they would even remain united what with the debts, the economic turmoil, and the slow realization that without England they had no protection from the outside world. The question on everyone’s mind was, is there anything that can be done to save their country? 55 delegates gathered in hopes of answering this question with a brilliant solution of their own.…

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander Hamilton’s plan for a National Bank created controversy in our country. The argument was whether it was “constitutional”. Despite warnings from George Washington two political parties were created. Hamilton led the federalists and Jefferson led the Democratic-Republicans. After the War of 1812 our country entered an Era of Good Feelings in which there was only one political party, the Democratic-Republicans.…

    • 988 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Liberals claimed that the Lords were the selfish rich who weren’t willing to help the country, whereas the Conservatives tried to appeal to the wealthy stating that this would lead to social revolution and that is was the duty of the House of Lords to block controversial policy that the public hadn’t voted on. The Liberals won with a 2 seat majority and the support of the Irish Nationalists who were hoping to obtain Home Rule through the Liberal government which led to the tax being passed. This Liberal win led to the second constitutional crisis where the Liberals pushed a bill which sought to remove the power of the House of Lords to veto bills and replace it with a power of suspensory veto, to delay a bill for 2 years – yet remove their power entirely to alter ‘money bills’. The Lords rejected this again which led to Asquith going to King Edward VII asking him to create more Liberal peers which he agreed to but died before he could bring this reality. His son King George V preferred a more consensual agreement between the two parties and this led to the 1910 constitutional conference where the conservatives offered to reform Lords powers, yet the Liberals rejected this and the conference ended in November which led to the second 1910 general…

    • 1189 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is argued by some that Peel was greatly successful up to 1841 due to the fact that he brought the Tory Party from being a “beleaguered minority” (Adelman, 1989) to being a strong, relevant power once again. However, this ‘low point’ of 1832 is often greatly exaggerated by admirers of Peel. Arguably the high levels of support that the Whig’s received in the election of 1832 was predominantly down to the fact that they advocated the issue of Parliamentary Reform, meaning that it can be argued that the period of unpopularity that the Tory party suffered in 1832 could only ever have been temporary. Arguably even if Peel had not advocated the policies which many consider to be very ‘successful’, the fortunes of the Tory Party would have still recovered, as many of the newly enfranchised voters, far from punishing the Tories, enjoyed the exclusivity of Parliament and wanted to retain that exclusivity through conservative policies. Although the skills of Peel as an orator did contribute to the Tory revival to a certain extent, the Whig majority in Parliament was so fundamentally fragile that it hardly needed exploitation by Peel. Although Peel did contribute to disuniting the Whig majority by, for example, exploiting the Whig difficulties in the management of Anglican Church funds in Ireland, the opportunity to do so arose spontaneously, and merely needed to be…

    • 1317 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The purpose of this essay is to determine whether welfare reform since 1997 has been determined more by ideology or pragmatism. This essay offers a summary of public pronouncements made by some of New Labour’s leading thinkers in the years before they took office in order to then delve into the motivations behind them. While the focus on welfare reforms undertaken since 1997 rests with the Labour government’s policy toward the NHS, the essay establishes that there is a great deal of evidence to support the view that Labour have acted out of pragmatic considerations. Nevertheless, it is argued that policy toward reforming one of the key elements of welfare in Britain, the National health Service, in the main, has been driven by ideology.…

    • 3395 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    With a new national government under The Constitution, many feared that it could fail to be effective just as the Articles failed, but the acts of Washington and Adams during their presidencies would disprove this fear. For example one of the first things Washington did in his presidency was to establish the first presidential cabinet. The presidential cabinet was a group of four men (Thomas Jefferson- Secretary of State, Alexander Hamilton- Secretary of the Treasury, Henry Knox- Secretary of War, and Edmund Randolph- Attorney General) selected by Washington himself to be his advisers, and help to carry out his duties. The effectiveness or ineffectiveness of his cabinet would appear almost immediately with the rise of Hamilton’s financial plan. Hamilton’s plan called for a funding of national and state debt at par to show the reliability of a strong federal government and establish federalism. But this part of his plan fueled sectionalist ideals between the north and south. Another part of his plan was to establish a National Bank to regulate the economy and establish a national currency. This part of his plan did make the government more effective but it went against Democratic-Republican ideas of a strict interpretation of the constitution, which increased partisan tension. And the last point in his plan was to raise taxes on general goods and excise taxes on luxury goods. When Washington second term came to a close he left the country with three “rules” to follow in his farewell address; avoid sectionalism, avoid political parties, and avoid permanent alliances. These “rules” set a great structure for a young and successful government, but inevitably, weren’t able to be followed.…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The national bank for example, Jefferson opposed the idea because the Constitution didn’t give them power to establish a national bank. Jefferson didn’t want the government to over power, and establishing a national bank would give the government too much power in their eyes. Hamilton wanted the National bank because people needed a place to store and keep their money safe, even though the Constitution didn’t state that we could, Hamilton believed that it would benefit the people. Jefferson lost that argument, the National Bank was published…

    • 557 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Charles Beard

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Charles Beard’s book, An Economic Interpretation of the U.S. Constitution, was published in 1913 and soon became one of the most controversial literary works of its time. Beard’s main thesis in this book is essentially that the Founding Fathers chose the specific format of the Constitution of the United States to protect their personal financial interests. Beard then goes on to argue that the Constitution was written by an “elite” attempting to safeguard their own assets and financial status. Beard was expanding on Carl L. Becker’s thesis of class conflict. In the eyes of Beard, the Constitution was created by the Founding Fathers as a “counter revolution” that ran against the wishes of farmers and laborers.…

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1999 Labour reformed the House of Lords; Labour removed 600 hereditary peers and reduced it to only 92 hereditary Lords in the House of Lords. However, the labor government did propose a system of “elected peers”, where the public could choose peers to sit in the House of Lords. This proposal was never fully implemented into the UK constitution. Until this proposal is full entrenched it is argued that the Lords are not democratically legitimate as all policy making institutions must have legitimacy. Therefore, there is much that can be done towards constitutional reform.…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1867 reform act

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages

    It could also be argued that not only was the government being pressured into reform by these groups but it was scared of the repercussions and outbursts that could follow if the act was not passed. During this time Britain had gone through many difficult times such as , economic depression, a cholera epidemic and quite high unemployment. This would make the government anxious about the current temper of the general public and therefore wouldn’t want to upset them. An example of the public unrest would have been the Hyde park riots of 1867, where railings were ripped off windows were smashed and there was great uproar. This is then…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Commutative Justice and the National Debt . In Chapter 4 of the text, the author examines commutative justice across the generations (see Section 4.5). This idea arises from the writings of British political thinker Edmund Burke (1790):…

    • 548 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Progressive Movement

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Progressive reformers set out to destroy corruption in the government. To do so, they believed many changes had to be made. They supported the “initiative” because it allowed voters to directly propose new laws. They supported the “referendum” because any law passed by legislature can be approved or vetoed by the people. Furthermore, they supported “recall” where the people could vote to remove an elected official from office if they saw them unfit. This gave much power back to the people because it gave them a voice in the government. It also forced elected officials to become responsible, attend to the needs of the people, and take part in making the government more efficient. Still unsatisfied, the Progressives reformers won the people the power of electing senators after convincing the U.S. congress to pass the 17th amendment in 1913. Before 1913, senators had been…

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays