The flaw was first discovered in June 1994, when Intel engineers first noticed that the floating-point unit (FPU) on the chip gave the wrong answer. However future tests done by Intel showed that the error appeared only in the ninth significant digit of the answer and affected a very, very small percentage of possible division combinations. The results of this flaw…
The “Pentium flaw” or the Pentium FDIV bug was when Intel released defective Pentium processors. The defect was malfunctioning P5 Pentium floating point unit causing the computer to calculate division incorrectly. The “bug” was discovered by Professor Thomas Nicely when working on mathematical equations and noticed many inconsistencies in his calculations when he added a Pentium based computer on June, 13, 1994. Intel tried to keep the bug out of the lime light while they worked on updates to try and fix the problem but, persistent consumers kept pushing the issue on the internet and in magazines.…
This information was hidden from the public and was noted safe for public release. Some of the problems that this causes is that not only has it demonstrated…
Sterling computer has entered into a partnership with NoBugs a microchip processing computer. The collaboration was developing into a something successful until an incident put a strain in the business relationship. Some month ago Sterling computer has had several of their computers explode shortly after customers install them. Upon an investigation which was conducted by Sterling researchers have discovered evidence of NoBugs’s microchips aggravating a dormant defect in their computers, causing them to explode. The analysis on NoBugs microchips revealed that they were indeed below design specification and that the imperfections were caused by a slight miscalibration of NoBugs’s encoding equipment. Once, the information was presented to NoBugs they course of action correcting the problem by recalibrating the equipment and promptly resumed production of making perfect chips. However, this incident has caused Sterling business to bare the gaunt of the financial burden which is a loss of profits, out-of-pocket associated with compensating customers for the explosions, and injury to its business reputation by total accumulation will exceed somewhere north of $20 million dollars.…
After a thorough investigation by federal law enforcement it had been determined that hackers were able to infiltrate the network and place malware on several pieces of the companies Point of Sale (POS) systems. The attackers were meticulous and thought through their attack, attempting to…
Back in June, 1994 the Pentium Flaw was noticed by Intel testers, who had discovered a division error on the Pentium chip. Intel managers didn’t see this as a major problem so they kept this from anyone outside their corporation. The nature of this issue was a mathematical problem in their Floating Point Unit (FPU), or the math coprocessor. The Pentium chip was having glitches in calculating large divisions. It wasn’t until October 19th, when Dr. Thomas R. Nicely had revealed the malfunction of the (FPU) trying to do certain calculations. Dr. Nicely was a mathematics teacher at Lynchburg College in Virginia. After running several test on the 486 and Pentium he had pin pointed the error to the Pentium chip. Dr. Nicely contacted Intel and they had confirmed the error, but said they had no reports till then. Intel handled the situation very poorly; they would not return contact to Dr. Nicely, forcing him to write a…
In June 1994, Intel discovered the floating-point unit flaw in the Pentium microprocessor. Professor Thomas Nicely, a professor of mathematics at the Lynchburg College, had written code to enumerate primes, twin primes, prime triplets, and prime quadruplets. Professor Thomas Nicely noticed some inconsistencies in the calculations on June 13th , 1994 shortly after adding a Pentium system to his group of computers, but was unable to eliminate other possible factors (such as programming errors, motherboard chipsets, etc.) until October 19, 1994. On October 24th, 1994 he reported the flaw he encountered to Intel. According to Professor Thomas Nicely, the person that he contacted at Intel later admitted to Intel being aware of the flaw since May 1994. The flaw was discovered by Intel during testing of the FPU for its new P6 core, which was first used in the Pentium Pro.…
1. The third general standard, requiring the exercise of due professional care when practicing the audit and preparing the report, was violated since Michael and Brian didn’t take the responsibility to observe the standards of field work and reporting. In the case of the write-off of accounts receivable, they didn’t compare the information in the final press release with the spreadsheets given by the company’s chief accounting officer. The third standard of field work, which requires the obtaining of sufficient competent evidence matter, was violated because the substantial procedure for testing details of accounts receivable, including the confirmation of accounts receivable, was not executed appropriately. The sufficient appropriate audit evidence is principally gathered through tests and procedures. But in the case of the sales returns and allowances, Michael and Brian accepted $5.3 million as the correct number without taking further tests.…
HP created a remarkable new technology, but its targeted market never blossomed. Just at the end of the case as the clock was running out on the Kittyhawk team, Nintendo approached HP with its Nintendo 64 system with a slot for a 1.3” disk drive, and projections that it would sell several million units per day during the upcoming Christmas season. The problem was that they needed the drive for $49.95, and HP had designed the Kittyhawk for a different market at a cost of $250 per unit. The 1.3 drive was a potentially disruptive technology which could have been designed to a $49.95 price point, but HP had positioned it as a sustaining technology, as nearly as possible.…
When I read the General Motors Misled Grieving Families on a Lethal Flaw, an overwhelming sadness fell upon me. I was sad that 26 families had to bury family members die to faulty equipment in the Chevrolet Cobalts. The key ethical issue is that General Motors knew that the black boxes in the Cobalts confirmed the potential fatal defect existing in hundreds of thousands of cars (Stout et al., 2014). Another ethical issue was the fact that GM would tell the families of the victims that they had no knowledge of any defects in their cars and once the families wanted to sue they would threaten to come after them or even said they would sue the families. One more issue that is ethical is GM didn’t immediately recall the Chevy Cobalts after the first…
Not only that HP’s troubles go back even further, to when the board hired Carly Fiorina, then after six years realized she wasn’t working out and fired her. Then came a spying scandal in which the board’s chairperson, Patricia Dunn, authorized an outside firm to spy on other board members whom she suspected of leaking private information. Then came the Hurd sex scandal, which HP handled clumsily. (Lyons, 2011) Just reviewing the history HP suffers from poor…
Between 1974-1984, Intel started losing market share to Japanese competition. This lost in market share can be attributed to several reasons. The first would be the fact that patents were not easily enforceable for DRAMS. Additionally the Japanese competitors have invested heavily in manufacturing and process technologies, leading to faster development cycles, higher yields, and a technological advantage.…
The author makes reference to a source that he researched, Business Week, 2001. This article lacks quality of evidence for the mere fact that it is not up to date. Some comparison could have been made to modern technologies related to computers, for instance laptops or other devices.…
Why did a minor math error that would occur only once every 27,000 years so enrage customers that it briefly threatened to derail Intel’s Pentium chip? And how could a feature as trivial as an inexpensive cup holder swing millions of customers to purchase a $17,000 automobile—particularly when only three years later, the same cup holder had become almost invisible to buyers? Is it possible to develop rational product strategies in the face of apparently irrational customer behavior?…
Yet in spite of its solemn buildings and its lack of fire-escapes, ventilation, sanitation, and up-to-date kitchen facilities, I persist in my assertion that I believe that CPU (China Pharmaceutical University) , in its way, is the greatest school in which I have studied. I am aware that this is an extreme statement and needs the explanation. CPU is much larger in numbers, for example, than my middle school--XMFLS(Xiamen Foreign Language School), and is much richer. To mention XMFLS beside the 13 640 students of CPU sounds ridiculous. In point of money, the endowment of the CPU, which gained from pharmaceutical industries as well as alumnus, seems to leave XMFLS nowhere. Now as a proud student of CPU, I am trying to investigate just how can this peculiar excellence of CPU arises.…