Preview

A Glorious Defeat

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1212 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
A Glorious Defeat
For the Glory of Mexico In this book, Timothy J. Henderson examines the origins, outcomes, and modern-day consequences of the Mexican-American War (1846-1848). A Glorious Defeat is organized around two central questions: why did Mexico go to war with the United States in 1846 and why did the war go so badly for Mexico? Henderson does provide the answers to these questions, based on the reader having some knowledge of the expansionist history that the US partook in with its southern neighbors, but who are “far less certain why Mexico went to war with the United States” (xviii). Henderson provides this book to as a means to correct the current Anglo-centric literature that circulates America, in which blames Mexico for its own losses “because they were proud to the point of delusion, arrogantly overestimating their own strength” (xviii). He states that it is fair and adequate to state that neither side of the battle is to blame, when in fact stemmed from the weakness of the Mexican nation, not by the aggressive nature of the US. The fact is Mexico was not the thriving and well established US; it was a meek and frail nation. The US, after the annexation of Texas, saw Mexico with the government’s bonds to the northern states and own political standings, as a challenge that can be devoured by the victorious nation. There was also Mexico’s own acknowledgement of its nations weakness that drove the political leaders to engage in a war with an obvious superior nation, in attempts to gain power and defend its honor. War with the United States gave Mexican leaders the opportunity to “indulge in the illusion” that the nation was not rent by economic, ethnic, and geographic divisions, but was instead“ resolute and united against a foreign foe” (191). Henderson attempts to “understand Mexico’s weakness and how that weakness helped land it in a war with the United States,” relying heavily on evidence of Mexico’s disadvantages in comparison to the vitality and abundance


Cited: Henderson, Timothy J. A Glorious Defeat: Mexico and Its War with the United States. New York: Hill and Wang, 2007. Print.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Eisenhower, John S. D. So Far From God: The U. S. War with Mexico 1846 – 1848. New York: Random House, 1989, xxvi, 436.…

    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Zinn wrote “Accompanying all this aggressiveness was the idea that the United States would be giving the blessings of liberty and democracy to more people. This was intermingling with ideas of racial superiority, longings for the beautiful lands of New Mexico and California, and thoughts of commercial enterprise across the Pacific.” This quote shows how the goal for the Mexican- American War was not a defensive motive, but more of a need to grow and expand.…

    • 1451 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although James Knox Polk doubled the size of the nation, he is rarely acknowledged by modern historians because of his machinations in initiating the start of the Mexican War. Without his efforts, however, America would be cut off at the Missouri River, exclude Texas, and have a disparate legacy of slavery and race relations as known today (Merry 17). Polk’s presidency was characterized by rapid expansion of American territory through war and treaties, as was William McKinley's. In McKinley’s period, as a consewuence of the Spanish American War, the United States acquired dominance of Hawaii, the Philippines, Puerto Rico, and Cuba. Of course, while there were significant differences between Polk’s and McKinley’s presidencies, it’s nevertheless…

    • 128 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mexican War Research Paper

    • 2275 Words
    • 10 Pages

    The results of the Mexican­American war varied in size and scope. Some of the effects…

    • 2275 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “We Take Nothing By Conquest, Thank God,” is a chapter in Howard Zinn's, History of the People. Zinn makes the point that the Mexican-American War was agitated by President Polk, and that the newspapers of the time falsely represented people's opinions of the war even though it was very unpopular among U.S citizens, and the army itself. In the night of his inauguration President Polk confided in his Secretary of the Navy that one of his main objectives was to acquire California. Then Polk incited the war by sending American soldiers into what was disputed territory that was controlled by the Mexicans. The American government had given Mexico no choice, but to fire the first shot and so the war was started. At the same time the Democratic Review became famous saying that it was “Our manifest destiny to overspread the continent allotted by Providence for the free development of our yearly multiplying millions,” in order to inspire more people to join the volunteer army to fight in Mexico. At the same time the New York Journal of Commerce stated that, “The supreme Ruler of the universe seems to interpose, and aid the energy of man towards benefiting mankind. His interposition...seems to me to be identified with the success of our arms...That the redemption of 7,000,000 of souls from all the vices that infest the human race, is the ostensible object...appears manifest,” in order to justify the Mexican-American War in the eyes of their readers.…

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Mexican-American War (1846-1848) was the first U.S. armed war fought on foreign soil. It put a politically divided and militarily unprepared Mexico against the expansionist-minded government of U.S. President James K. Polk. Polk believed the United States had a “manifest destiny” to spread across the continent to the Pacific Ocean. A border clash along the Rio Grande started off the fighting and was followed by a series of U.S. victories. In then end, Mexico lost one-third of its territory, including nearly all of present-day California, Utah, Nevada, Arizona and New Mexico (Gonzales, Mexicanos).…

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Vulliamy essay 2

    • 1166 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Cited: Vulliamy, Edward, “Killing for Kudos – the brutal face of Mexico’s 21st-century war.” Guardian 7 Sunday February 2010…

    • 1166 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    “The U.S. -Mexican War, like any other war, was fundamentally about violence-a violence that did not end once the war or the military phase of the war ended. ”The violence people experienced was not just in taking away their land or livelihood but an effect to take away their language. Most families were torn apart. They held land and homes. A political border was created and part of the family was on one side and the other part was on the opposite side.…

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In this paper, I will be summarizing the following chapters: Chapter 3: "A Legacy of Hate: The Conquest of Mexico’s Northwest”; Chapter 4: “Remember the Alamo: The Colonization of Texas”; and Chapter 5: “Freedom in a Cage: The Colonization of New Mexico. All three chapters are from the book, “Occupied America, A History of Chicanos” by Rodolfo F. Acuna. In chapter three, Acuna explains the causes of the war between Mexico and North America. In chapter four, Acuna explains the colonization of Texas and how Mexicans migrated from Mexico to Texas. In chapter five, Acuna explains the colonization of New Mexico and the economic changes that the people had to go through.…

    • 1328 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Moon, Bart. "Mexico: The Bicentennial and Beyond." American Diplomacy (2010). Opposing Viewpoints In Context. Web. 15 Mar. 2013.…

    • 2196 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    A Just War

    • 865 Words
    • 4 Pages

    “The power to wage war is the power to wage war successfully” (Evans Hughes, Charles). In 1846 the United States and Mexico went to war against each other over disagreements mainly regarding the area of Texas. Mexico claimed the war was to protect its territorial integrity while the United States claimed the war was an act of self defense. In the Just War Theory actions and intentions of warring nations are upheld to a standard of justification. This Theory attempts to provide parameters of acceptable behavior when declaring and waging war. It also provides examples of offenses often committed in war. When examining the events leading up to the war, it becomes clear that the United States was acting in accordance with the principles put forth in the Just War Theory. The participation of the United States in the Mexican-American war was just because war was declared as a last resort, the war was fought on behalf of a just cause, and the war was declared by a legitimate authority.…

    • 865 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “In the eyes of the [Mexican] government, the mobilization of the US army was an outright attack on Mexico…. As a consequence, the Mexican government reaffirmed the instruction to protect the border” (Jesus Velasco-Marquez 327). But even though some have seen America’s actions as selfish and mean, America did have enough reasons in expanding, growing and prospering. America was never a bully and their actions were significant in the becoming of the…

    • 853 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Mexican American War

    • 1088 Words
    • 5 Pages

    It’s purpose is also to inform us on the causes and outcomes of The Mexican-American War, more specifically to inform Mexican students on this important event since it’s a chapter from a Mexican textbook. This source also helps us understand the political, social, and economic status of Mexico at the time of American immigration. It a well informs us on the causes that led up to the Mexican-American War and how it helped the United States grow at Mexico’s expense. Another thing that this source covers are the consequences that both nations had to deal with due to the war. However, Mexico had much more losses than gains due to this…

    • 1088 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The southern borderlands at the heart of the current debate serve as a testament to the region’s troubled past.While the U.S. and Mexico have similar origins as constitutional republics that broke free from colonial forbearers, it was only the former that doggedly pursued expansionism under the guise of Manifest Destiny. As early as the 1820s, the enduring racial stereotype of Mexicans as an “idle, thriftless people” was used to justify the rapid influx of White Americans into the Mexican territory of California, with the eminent statesman Richard Henry Dana reported to have exclaimed that “in the hands of an enterprising people, what a country this might be!” After the Mexican-American War claimed around 40,000 lives in less than two years…

    • 293 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Winston Churchill once said “Manifest destiny was on the march, and it was unfortunate that Mexico stood in the path.” In 1845, the Republic of Texas was annexed to the United States of America. There was one problem, though. Mexico and the United States disagreed on the border of Texas, whether it was on the Nueces River or Rio Grande River. There was a war between the two countries that lasted from 1846 to 1848. After the Mexican army lost, they surrendered Nevada, California, Utah, Arizona, Colorado, New Mexico, and Wyoming. Also, in the Oregon Treaty of 1846, under…

    • 217 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays