02-28-08
Philosophy 60 T-TH 10:40-12:10
The case against abortion
Is abortion murder or a matter of choice is a question that has been in the mainstream of moral debates for as long as I can remember. I have always supported a women’s right to choose, however in this paper I shall look at the philosophical argument to the contrary. In this deductive look at a classic dilemma, I will first outline why killing a person is wrong and then determine at what point the “unborn” is considered to be a person. At that point, we can decide when abortion becomes murder and not a matter of a person’s free will concerning their body. Most people can agree that the killing of a fellow human being is “severely wrong,” excluding specific instances like self-defense and euthanasia (Marquis). However, Professor Dan Marquis of the University of Kansas takes it a step further and attempts to decipher exactly what it is about murder that makes it wrong. Marquis states that a “premature death” has the misfortune of “depriving an individual of a future of value” and for this reason killing is immoral. Now professor marquis’ argument itself can and is used as an argument against abortion, however, I want a more definitive answer as to when a fetus is considered a person. For this, I found a very cogent argument written by John T. Noonan Jr. The first of his two main arguments states that at the moment of conception there is a substantial jump in “human potential” (Noonan). That is to say, that before conception occurred there is very little chance that a rationally thinking human being will (for lack of a better term) be created. In fact, the odds of one sperm reaching one egg at precisely the right moment (ovulation) are roughly 200,000,000 to one. Compare that to the four out of five odds that a human being will result after or rather at the moment of conception. Noonan supports his view that conception is the decisive moment in human development when abortion becomes the homicide of a human being by providing a convincing example. Noonan’s example says that no one will hold you responsible for shooting your gun into some rustling bushes if the odds are 200,000,000 to one that a man is causing the rustling. However, if the odds were four out of five that a man causes the rustling in the bushes than it would be very irresponsible of you to discharge your gun. Noonan’s second reason for conception being the ideal moment to draw the proverbial line is that at the moment of conception the “new being” has the human genetic code, which according to Noonan makes it a human being. He states that the human genetic code contains the “possibility of human wisdom” (Noonan).
To summarize, Marquis shows us that killing is wrong because it takes away a persons ability to have a “future like ours” (Marquis). Which accurately explains why killing a human being is wrong. Then Noonan defines for us at what point a fetus is considered a human being. That is to say that the only significant jump in “human potential” comes at the moment of conception, where the fetus also receives the human genetic code. Now using the arguments I have shown why killing a person is wrong and that a person is “born” at the moment of conception, thus proving that abortion is morally wrong and murder.
I set out to take a deductive look at the counter argument to my current beliefs. However, in the end it turns out that all I could accomplish was to find a very cogent inductive reasoning for the stance that abortion is murder. On the other hand, the counter to the debate on abortion is also inductive as nothing can prove morality, only try to define it as universally as possible, thus making all positions on the issue inductive. Bibliography
1. “The Morality of abortion: Legal and historical perspectives.” John T. Noonan Jr. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press. 1970. pp. 51-59.
2. “Why Abortion is Immoral.” Dan Marquis. Journal of Philosophy, 86. 1989. pp.183-202.
Bibliography: 1. “The Morality of abortion: Legal and historical perspectives.” John T. Noonan Jr. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press. 1970. pp. 51-59. 2. “Why Abortion is Immoral.” Dan Marquis. Journal of Philosophy, 86. 1989. pp.183-202.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
The question between whether abortion is morally right or wrong has been talked about for years and no common ground has been made. Judith Thomson, a believer in Pro-choice, argues that abortion is not wrong because the mother should have a choice of what happens to her body. In response to this, Donald Marquis who is against abortion believes every fetus is a human with a right to have a future like ours. Each Ethicist gives examples and theories as to why abortion is wrong or right. In this essay, I will attempt to show that abortion is okay in some cases, and Donald Marquis’s views and arguments are broad and incorrect.…
- 1756 Words
- 8 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The debate about abortion focuses on two issues; 1.) Whether the human fetus has the right to life, and, if so, 2.) Whether the rights of the mother override the rights of the fetus. The two ethicists who present strong arguments for their position, and who I am further going to discuss are that of Don Marquis and Judith Thomson. Marquis' "Future Like Ours" (FLO) theory represents his main argument, whereas, Thomson uses analogies to influence the reader of her point of view. Each argument contains strengths and weaknesses, and the point of this paper is to show you that Marquis presents a more sound argument against abortion than Thomson presents for it. An in depth overview of both arguments will be presented in the paper, as well as a critique of both the pros and cons that stem out from the question-begging arguments.…
- 3100 Words
- 89 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The topic of abortion is a highly controversial issue in today's society, and various views are held concerning the morality of the procedure. Some people feel that abortion is simply cold-blooded murder, because it is their opinion that a 'foetus' is a human being from the moment of conception. However, others would argue that a foetus is merely insubstantial matter, dependant entirely on its mother's body for survival, with no real life of its own. It is for this reason that pro-abortionists support the woman's choice to undergo abortion. After all, why should something so small and insignificant, which is not yet human, be entitled to the same rights and privileges a real human has"…
- 1652 Words
- 7 Pages
Good Essays -
Many people believe that abortions should be legal because women should have the right to choose whether or not they want to bring a baby into the world. They believe a woman should have property rights which include the body and the fetus. They also believe a woman should have privacy rights which means the state should not interfere with private matters. These people are called pro choice. At the same time many people are anti-abortion because they believe “Life is present from the moment of conception” (526). In Don Marquis’s essay, “Why Abortion is Immoral” he takes the position that abortion is “morally unjustified” (525). The purpose of the essay is to go against the belief that “The anti-abortion position is either a symptom of irrational religious dogma or a conclusion generated by seriously confused philosophical argument” (525). Abortions should be illegal because they are morally wrong except, in cases beyond our control.…
- 1058 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Judith Jarvis Thompson and Don Marquis both have markedly different views on the topic of abortion. Thompson generally argues that there are cases where abortion may be morally permissible, due to the rights of the mother, while Marquis argues that abortion is almost always morally wrong, except under extraordinary circumstances, because the fetus has a future life. In this paper, I will evaluate the arguments of both parties, as well as identify what premises, if any, they both agree on. In addition, I will supply my own reasoning for why I believe that Marquis presents the more successful argument.…
- 1643 Words
- 7 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Marquis, Don. "Why Abortion Is Immoral." Journal of Philosophy 86 (1989): 183-202. Print. This journal is written by a philospher by the name of Don Marquis. While this document is quit outdated it still plays an important role in today 's debate about abortion. It is used by pro-life activists when debating the reasons why they feel abortion is immoral. This journal is long and filled with great ideas to ponder about life, its meaning and signifigance to the world. Marquis has etched his name with this written journal in the never ending debate of wether abortion is right or wrong. I think this piece will be valuable to my essay in that it will give my audience a deeper perception than the current idea that abortion should be a womens choice.…
- 1263 Words
- 6 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
“Heads or Tells”, shouts the referee, as he flips the coin. Just before the coin lands the quarterback hollers, “neither”. The astonished crowd watches as the coin lands on its edge. No one considers this possibility; after all, what are the odds of this occurring. The possibility does however remain even though unconsidered. In this paper the author will show the as yet unexplored side of abortion, the third perspective. This paper will examine: Prolife, Prochoice, and The rights of the unborn child.…
- 1769 Words
- 8 Pages
Better Essays -
In industrialized world, abortion is not a criminal offence until a series of law against abortion were passed during the nineteenth century. The proponent prohibition of abortion globally has stressed the medical dangers of abortion. Moreover, it is also argued that fetuses are human beings. Deliberate abortion is therefore considered a form of homicide crime (……..). In popular rhetoric in the USA, abortion issue is considered as a purely women’s right that helps them in maintaining their bodies. Therefore, if women possess the moral right to abort their unwanted pregnancies, the law should not prohibit them from practicing the act of abortion. However, the arguments for this right cannot entirely solve the moral issue of abortion. It is one thing to have a right and another to morally justify when exercising that right. Since fetuses are considered to have equal rights to life like any other person, women’s right to abortion should therefore be exercised only on extreme…
- 989 Words
- 4 Pages
Better Essays -
“Since the legalization of abortion in 1973, over 56 million unborn children have been killed.” Their mothers never gave them chance to be born. Abortion has been a debatable topic for decades, but aborting a human being is morally wrong and medically unsafe.…
- 1608 Words
- 7 Pages
Better Essays -
Over the past decades, women in America have been fighting for their rights. For example, on the 18th of August in 1920, women were granted the right to vote. Although women have gained many rights, they still today are fighting to keep their right to aborting a fetus within them. Many individuals see underlying issues with suppressing abortion. Abortion may cause more of an advantage than harm.…
- 355 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
: A growing issue in our society today is late-term abortion. A mother and baby develop a very emotional connection through pregnancy, which can leave a mother feeling very devastated if she pursues this act. Since late-term unborn babies begin to develop a sense of consciousness, there is no reason that they should not be treated as people and be acknowledged as having human rights. In a situation where two people’s benefits are conflicting, this right must be deliberated and equivalent. I will argue that the moral principles of Kant, Marquis, and Thomson on abortion will oppose Sue and her husband’s decision to have a late-term abortion at seven months pregnant.…
- 752 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
In the first chapter Fineman poses the question “Who is a person?”. The answer seems to be something so simple, yet it is very complex. The topic deals with humans rights given in the constitution. The question has always been prominent in our society because the founding fathers wrote a constitution the did not fit all Americans. The constitution was written for the white male. African Americans and women did not have these rights until later on in history. The question also is apparent in the abortion argument, Gary Bauer a prominent figure in the Pro-life movement fights to say unborn fetuses are people. The meaning of a person and who deserve constitutional is expanding. In history it wasn't always so easy and people had to fight for their…
- 1277 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays -
In his article, Why Abortion is Immoral, Don Marquis argues that abortion is seriously morally wrong and should not be permitted except in certain cases (2012). The exceptions Marquis makes for when abortion is permissible include, in instances of rape, when the pregnancy could threaten the woman’s life, when the fetus is anencephalic, and during the first fourteen days after conception (2012). In his argument, Marquis attempts to bypass the traditional abortion debate which has largely focused on whether or not the fetus is a person (2012). By explaining why killing in general is wrong, Marquis will seek to prove that abortion is morally equivalent to killing an adult because it robs them of their future (2012).…
- 667 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Morality of abortion it is difficult to take a stand without contradicting widely held belief. In Refuse to Choose: Women Deserve Better than Abortion, Serrin M. Foster focused on developing to educate women, the highest risk of abortion about our rich pro-life feminist heritage and redirect the debate toward woman-centered solutions. This essay on morality of abortion with stand on pro-life, argues that the fetus is a living being. Pro-life argues that it is unethical to do abortion because it is deliberately killing a living being and murder is a crime. One has to take responsibility for the consequence of their actions. Morality of abortion sees the pregnant women, whatever the circumstance is, responsible for the child inside her womb since it is still dependent for its continued existence. Personal convenience should not take over valuing life. Morality of abortion take the pro-life stand because the mother still has her options after giving birth. If the mother does not want the baby, she can put the baby for adoption and let somebody else take care of it. Each woman who undergoes abortion risks her life. There is always that high risk that abortion will not only cause the death of the baby but also of the mother as well. The morality of abortion take a stand that abortion should never be a pregnant woman’s choice. Foster believes abortion harms women, such as, damages that abortion causes to women's bodies can result in: Infertility, Future Miscarriages, or…
- 1049 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
For assignment number two I chose an article from The New York Times on abortion. The article is titled: When Abortion becomes birth: A Dilemma of Medical Ethics Shaken by New Advances (New York Times). The main ethical question following this article is: when if ever is an abortion ethical according to deontology? Abortion by dictionary definition is “the deliberate termination of a human pregnancy, most often performed during the first 28 weeks of pregnancy” (“Abortion.” Merriam-Webster). Abortion is one of the most controversial ethical issues because it concerns the taking of a human life. Anti-abortion regulations first began to appear in the United States during the 1820s. Although the most influential case was the Roe Vs…
- 658 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays