This case takes place in a meeting between employees of the Florida Project for Human Justice at the Florida State Prison. Diane Epps a fifty-five-year-old Caucasian woman, Executive director, Joe Moran, the other lead attorney (only African American staff), Cynthia Sanders a petite 28-year-old Caucasian woman, the mitigation investigator, and an accountant, Jose Arnada, a thirty-four Mexican American man; the client, was sentenced the death penalty for a crime that he did not commit. Cynthia, the protagonist, is meeting with Diane and Joe to discuss ways to show Jose is competent to write his own appeal.…
Dina Temple-Raston captures the horrific murder of James Byrd Jr. in her book A Death in Texas. The setting of the story takes place in the small county of Jasper, Texas where racial tensions still existed amongst the Jasperites. Raston gives the vivid first-hand accounts and interviews of the disturbed closely- knit inhabitants and how they absorbed the news. The author explores the possible suspects of the murder and includes the trial and verdict of the convicted killers while addressing how the town rose from the ashes.…
Thirty years after hearing a 10 year old playmate casually announce: "Daddy and Roger and 'em shot 'em a nigger," Tyson examines the racial conflict and riots that took place in the spring of 1970 in Oxford, North Carolina, while also looking at the culture that allowed such an event to take place and that allowed Robert and Roger Teel to be acquitted of both murder and manslaughter charges. The same tensions of racial conflict and desegregation that existed in Oxford were a reflection of those being felt throughout North Carolina and the rest of the South. Blood Done Sign My Name explores the motivation behind Marrow’s death and the riots afterwards.…
In 2015, Carlton W. Reeves, a U.S Mississippi District Court judge talks about how racist brutalism is in its wake again. Reeves is on the verge of giving his sentence about a murder case where an African American, James Craig Anderson, was murdered by three young men named: Deryl Paul Dedmon, Dylan Wade Butler, and John Aaron Rice. The murder of Anderson is a part of resurgence of black killing that happened before in Mississippi. Reeves extensively used the three rhetorical appeals: ethos, logos, and pathos. The Judge illustrates how the past is being brought back to Mississippi, uses statistics about the torture of the African Americans, and personal stories to argue that the white male murders are just repeating history by bringing back…
Bryan Stevenson is a lawyer and the author of the book “Just Mercy.” The main story is about him defending an African American named Walter McMillan, from a small town named ‘Monroeville’ in Alabama. This man was falsely accused and convicted of killing a young white woman. The story of this book takes place in the 1980s and 1990s, which makes it so unbelievable. The writer compares the occurrence of his book to a very well-known American Classic “To Kill a Mockingbird” in which a black male was wrongfully accused of raping a white woman, who was defended by a white lawyer in the 1930’s.…
Summary: This story is about racism in the south and how it affects the people it concerns. It starts out with Jefferson being sentenced to death for a crime that he did not commit. He was in the wrong place, at the wrong time, and because he was…
The author created suspense from start to end. He doesn't even finish the story because many things could have happened afterwards. We are left in suspense with the cliffhanger. The author provides enough information for the reader to imagine what will happen next. He gives the reader…
“George Stinney, a fourteen-year-old black boy, was executed by the State of South Carolina on June 16, 1944” (Stevenson 157). George was arrested for the murder of two young white girls because he saw the day they were murdered. “The girls had approached them while they were playing outside and asked where they could find flowers” (Stevenson 157). It was claimed by the sheriff that George confessed to the murders although no signed statement was presented. His family was told to leave the town or else. Fourteen-year-old George was left alone to face an all-white jury that sentenced him to death. This was a young kid who was “Small even for his age” (Stevenson 158). This is wrong and “Years later, rumors surfaced that a white man from a prominent family confessed on his deathbed to killing the girls” (Stevenson 159). All because George was a young, poor, African American who did not have the proper representation to appeal the ruling, was dead 81 days after being approached by two young girls. This was the past and there are a few things we can do today to help those who are put in these kind of…
₁ Kevin Boyle, Arc of Justice. A Saga of race, Civil Rights,a nd murder in the Jazz Age, pg 27…
d Donald Marshall Junior, a young Mi’kmaq man, was arrested and wrongfully convicted of murdering Sandy Seale, a local black man in 1971. He spent 11 years in prison before being acquitted of his charges. It was because of the faulty and negligent police work that a seventeen year old was to be imprisoned for the next 11 years of his life. Due to their incompetence, not only was a young man sent to jail, but the perpetrator roamed free. It was in 1982 that the case was reopened by Marshall’s new lawyer, Stephen Aronson.…
In recent cases such as Treyvon Martin, it is evident that justice is being denied to innocent black men, an issue that has raised awareness for far to long. To Kill a Mockingbird, by Nelle Harper Lee, was written in 1960. In this novel, the man falsely accused of raping a white woman has no hope. In the 1930's Scottsboro boys trials, which took place just decades before the novel was written, a group of black men were also falsely accused of raping white women. Although there have been many great movements to promote equality and integration since the 1900s, the bias nature towards African-American men remains.…
In the movie, A Time to Kill, a ten year old black girl is raped and almost murdered by two southern, racist white men. The only reason she was attacked and near death was because the two men were drunk and they loathed different races other than their own. In retaliation to this tragic event, the young black girl’s father, Carl Lee Hailey, kills the two white men out of deep anger. He is then put on trial for murdering the two men. Normally a black man had no chance in winning such a case; however, his lawyer, Jake Brigance, who was white, searched for justice. Jake Brigance completely understood how Carl Lee Hailey must have felt. As the movie proceeds, justice is barely found and Carl Lee Hailey is set free. Many people who were involved in the trial and who were on Jake Brigance and Carl Lee Hailey’s team were put in harm’s way. Jake Brigance’s family, work partner and friends were threatened and sometimes attacked by the KKK. Jake Brigance almost lost his wife, daughter, and friends because they did not understand his sympathy for Carl Lee Hailey. Jake Brigance stood up for what he believed in and justice prevailed. (A Time to Kill) Even though it can be extremely difficult to fight for what’s right, it is always necessary.…
Some of the most important decisions in our lives are based on the values that our families and surrounding community impose on us. To make a difficult decision, especially about someone else’s future we have to put ourselves in the other persons shoe’s. I believe in the movie “A Time to Kill” , Jake the lawyer’s closing argument would have allowed me to put myself in the shoes of the father of the girl that was rapped. I think the big contradiction in this case was the fact that the two boys that rapped the girl where white, and the girl they rapped was black. And at this point in time especially in the southern states racism was a really big issue. So this instantly put Carl in a bad position just due to the fact that he was the minority. I believe that Carl’s statement would have made an impact on my final decision in I were in the jury.…
There were many twists and turns in the story that the reader may not having anticipated.…
The Jury selection process was that there were many possible jurors, and the two lawyers picked who got to be on the jury during the trail, 6 choice for each lawyer. The lawyers based their designs on stereotypical stereotypes such as white will always feel that black is guilty, and other factors that contributed to what each lawyer wanted. I feel as though this is fair in the sense that each lawyer picks who they want, and no its not fair that they are choosing people that they know what they're final verdict will be.…