Preview

Absolutism and Democracy Have Had Effect on the Rights of the People Positively and Negatively Essay Example

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
367 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Absolutism and Democracy Have Had Effect on the Rights of the People Positively and Negatively Essay Example
Absolutism and democracy have had effect on the rights of the people positively and negatively. Absolutism and democracy have been spread across Europe, and the people hated both of them for their own reasons.

In different ways both absolutism and democracy and its effect the rights of the people and how they see their government. Absolutism gave the ruler total control over everything, that made the people feel too controlled and a fear for their ruler. That was a problem with absolutism it made people afraid of their ruler.

When the people of an absolute ruler are afraid they don’t support the ruler a hundred percent. That when the ruler needs the middle class and or high class they will not support the ruler’s decision. That’s what is needed in the long run.

With absolutism the ruler can control religion. A ruler can decide what the religion that the people have. But in most cases with religion the ruler allows religion to be open due to having the majority of the population involved with religion. But, rulers have declared divine right witch is saying that the ruler’s word has been sent from god. That gained the support of the religion.

Now with democracy it equals the power so know body has too much power. So now there is a need for wars, laws, and human rights have to be agreed on by groups of people and not one person. This gives people the feeling that they get their word out,

Those groups of people are called the executive, legislative, and judicial powers. If things need to get done, for an example a law it will need to be run through those powers first. And the people who are put in these branches are chosen buy the people of the country, and not a line of royalty.

There is a lot more processes in democracy that can get complex or get shut down before it started. When compared to absolutism, democracy would take longer process when the absolute ruler will just pass a law without concretions of other people of equal

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dr. J.K. McClain and other members of the cardiology department consulted on the patient. They felt that his hypokinesia and breathlessness were not secondary to his cardiac status. He had supraventricular cardiac arrhythmias, including atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter. The cardiology staff utilized intravenous medications that controlled the cardiac rate, adequately resolving these cardiac issues. I managed the patient’s venerator in the intensive care status along with my respiratory therapy team. Unfortunately the patient developed multiple infections,…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Absolutist France was a form government run by one person who had almost full control over everything, and Constitutionalist England was run by a number of people with a great deal of power. Even the rulers were required to obey the laws, and there was not only one person with complete control over everyone and everything. The definition of absolutism is "A term applied to strong centralized continental monarchies that attempted to make royal power dominant over aristocracies and other regional authorities." (Kagan) The definition of constitutionalism is "A form of government in which power is distributed and limited by a system of laws that must be obeyed by the rulers." (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=constitutionalism)…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    DBQ 10 21 14

    • 729 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Another important aspect of absolutism is religion and keeping the religious happy. The religious followers never like too much change and being an absolutist means you have full control over the church. In Document F, Bishop Jacques Bossuet is speaking about a king’s relation to the church; he states, “There is something religious in the…

    • 729 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay Reveiw

    • 4158 Words
    • 17 Pages

    a. Thesis: Rise of absolutism came at the expense of the medieval church, absolutism laid the foundation for the modern-nation state.…

    • 4158 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Absolutism is the acceptance of, or belief in absolute principles in political, philosophical, ethical, or theological matters. French absolutism started with Louis XIV and Russian absolutism started with Peter the Great. Louis XIV ruled from 1643-1714 and Peter the Great ruled from 1699-1725. In French absolutism, the rule of absolute monarchs was not all embracing because they lacked the financial and military resources, and the technology to make it so. France and Russia are alike in absolutism that they both sought to control religion and that they got the rich out of paying taxes. They are different in that Louis XIV wasn’t successful in wars, but Peter the Great was.…

    • 942 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Absolutism DBQ

    • 562 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries there were two main forms of government. The two main forms of government were democracy and absolutism. Both of these types of government were effective in there own ways. Absolutism was the most effective type of government during that time period. Absolutism is when the ruler has complete authority over the government and the lives of the people of their nation. Many rulers had a democracy government but absolutism was more effective because the rulers had all the power and it was hard to take advantage of them instead of a democracy where many rulers can get over thrown by the people of that country.…

    • 562 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    During the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries there were two forms of government. The two forms of government were democracy and absolutism. Both of these forms of government were effective in their own ways. Absolutism though was the most effective during this time. Absolutism is when the ruler has unlimited power. Many rulers had a democracy government but absolutism was more effective because the rulers had all the power and it was hard to take advantage of them rather than a democracy where many rulers can get over thrown by the people of that country.…

    • 967 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    During the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, there were two forms of government in Europe: absolutism, which gave unlimited power to the monarchs, and democracy, which gave power to the people. Which was more effective for this time period? Well, while both absolutism and democracy had their strengths and weaknesses, absolutism was more effective during this time. Machiavelli, who wrote The Prince, King Louis XIV of France, and King James I of England all believed absolutism to be most effective.…

    • 739 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dbq 11 Absolutism

    • 279 Words
    • 2 Pages

    During the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries absolutism was a more effective type of government than democracy. Absolutism was a form of government in which all of the power is in the hands of one ruler. Whereas, democracy is when the majority of the power is vested in the people. Absolutism occurred before the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries; therefore it had an example to be or not to be modeled after. Even though most forms of absolutistic governments shared the same thought, they differed in the ways that they were ruled. Democracy was also a form of government during this time but it was not as successful.…

    • 279 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Which form of government was most effective during the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries? Absolutism or Democracy?…

    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In a democracy, people choose their leaders by voting, and everyone is treated equally. Democracy revolves around rule by the majority. In my opinion, colonial America was on its way to democracy, but far from being a true democratic society. Only a small portion of the people were able to make the decisions, so government did not revolve around the majority.…

    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    dbq essay

    • 308 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Age of Democracy and the Age of Absolutism were two different periods of time. The age of Enlightenment had new ideas spreading throughout the world about government and human rights. The enlightenment was a great period of establishment of democracy .A democracy is when the common people are considered as the primary source of political power. Throughout the enlightenment there were philosophers who believed greatly in a democratic government. Some of the most familiar philosophers were Voltaire, John Locke, and Montesquieu. Each one of these philosophers was humanists and believed in natural rights. The Age of Absolutism was a time of absolute monarchs who had total control of everything. They made laws as they went along and if they didn’t like what the people said the monarchs would throw the people into jail and or put them to death. The Age of democracy is a response or answer to the Age of Absolutism by the new ideas that spread throughout the world. Although democracy and absolutism had advantages and disadvantages, democracy was a more effective type of government for it limited royal power and protected the rights of the people socially, politically, and economically. Throughout the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, tension arose between the two different types of governments, the democracy and absolute monarchs.…

    • 308 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    magnesuim

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages

    During the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, there were two forms of government, absolutism and democracy. Absolutism is when a ruler has unlimited power. A democracy is a form of government in which every person can participate in. Many rulers had a democratic government, but absolutism was more beneficial to the rulers because it gave them all the power.…

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Democracy differs from other types of government.For example, absolute monarchy, in which an individual holds all the power, or oligarchy, in which a few individuals hold all the power.…

    • 387 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Absolutism is the principle or exercise of complete or unrestricted power in government. It refers to any political role player that has complete control. This means that they were under the control of a single leader. 1 We see this in the European states in the 17th century, where states were ruled by absolute monarchs. This meant the king ruled with absolute power, with no restrictions or resistance shown against him. This royal authority has been passed down from generation to generation. People believed that kings given a Devine Right to rule by God. 2 Therefore no one even thought of disobeying the king because they were afraid of God. Europe was an unequal society at this time regarding politics, distribution of wealth and social wellness of people. The states primarily concern was collecting taxes from the people, most of which was used to finance the wars.3 Kings did not usually feel a great sense of obligation or liability to the people under his control, because they…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays