Preview

Admin Law summary

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
11264 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Admin Law summary
1

PART I: INTRO
Context of Admin Law: Anglo-Canadian Constitutional History
Definition of Admin Law as discussed in class
 “admin law is about ppl getting screwed by gvt”
 power is exercised by public officials – esp exec (statute, or royal prerog)
 Admin is control of that power o Creates legal parameters – from cml, statute, constitution
 Created by Cts (supervise), legislature (who delegate), and agencies themselves (use delegated power)
 Admin law also provides for relief, where use of power transgresses parameters
Mantra
 “show me the power”
 Roncarelli v. Duplessis – Duplessis enacts laws banning various Jehova wit activities,
Roncarelli is a Jehova’s wit and posts bail for offenders, Duplessis prosecutes for provoking and disturbing the order
 SCC: Rule of law (foundation of our Constitution) requires that law supersedes any “action dictated by the arbitrary likes, dislikes, and irrelevant purposes of public officials acting beyond their duty”
Historical Context
 History explains our funny rules, rather than logic (O.W. Holmes)
 Key words: Parliamentary sovereignty & rule of law; executive power; delegation’ jurisdiction & ultra vires
 Monarch and cabinet (exec)  accountable to legs (Parl)
 Absolute Monarch: William the Conqueror – personal control over state affairs – unfettered royal prerogative, except for physical capacity to enforce, ppl willing to follow
 Shrinking Monarch: takes advice re taxes from Barons, great councils (land owners), and curia Regis (privy council) emerge;
 Barons impose Magna Carta  first parameter: monarch needs consent to impose taxes, freemen (ie, mercantile class) can only be punished by peers
 By Edward I, Great Council becomes Parliament (Lords in HoL, and freemen in HoC): increase in wars, means Parlimament has more leverage
 Allows for legislative process: King can only say Yay or Nay – can’t change
 Eventually, Habeus Corpus: monarch to show cause if imprisoning

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    The Commons were the representative assemblies made up of knights and burgesses who advised the king on taxation and later came to be a separate house of parliament, the House of Commons, in 1341.…

    • 2324 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    parliament was the legislative body for the entire British Empire. But due to the great…

    • 351 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Court through Chief Justice Marshall has shown that the constitution is more superior than the federal law. No place in the constitution affirms the words Justice Marshall proclaimed. In making his judgment, Marshall stated that “It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is.” There is no mention of such words in the Constitution, but it has come to the attention of the courts that whenever there is a conflict of law, the constitution is always supreme (Murphy,…

    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    l. “Supreme law of the land” - indicates the Constitution is the ultimate authority to which all other laws and treaties must conform.…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Did you know that 98% of the Law Schools in America and England do not include Constitutional Law as a part of their law curriculum? The reason for this phenomenon is because Constitutional Law does not apply to or affect the enforcement of statutes, codes or administrative regulations, which have replaced constitutional law, the common law, public law and penal law and which have been designed to control you Pg 24 To take a loyalty oath to support, defend and obey the Constitution now is to swear an oath to your Masters to be ever loyal to them! “Slaves you are and slaves you will ever be!”…

    • 18144 Words
    • 57 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Synopsis of Rule of Law. Congress may enact laws that are necessary and proper to carry out their enumerated powers. The United States Constitution (Constitution) is the supreme law of the land and state laws cannot interfere with federal laws enacted within the scope of the Constitution.…

    • 607 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The development of parliament: In 1275 Edward I called his first Parliament. He summoned nobles and churchmen, but also issued orders (known as writs) for the election of two representatives from each county (the knights of the shire) and two from each city or town (the burgesses) to attend.They were called on primarily to listen to and approve the King's plan for a new tax. Over the following years it became an accepted rule that the representatives of those who were going to be most affected by taxation had to give their consent to it in Parliament.…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The aristocrats didn’t have any power, and were eminently displeased with the king. They replaced him in a bloodless uprising called the glorious revolution, with King William, and Queen Mary. If the king wanted to pass a law, or incarcerate one of his subjects, he had to follow due process of law, which means he the a person needs to be convicted and sentenced, and laws have to be passed by parliament. Parliament could check the king’s power in this way. This is an example of checks and balances, the idea that different parts of government should be able to check each other.…

    • 2079 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout its vast history, Great Britain remained constant in many ways, even when there were major incidents. Continuities from the 1600’s still exist today. For example, a monarch still sits on the royal throne. In the 16th century, although there were many monarchies in Europe, the British monarchs did not have absolute power due to England’s system of government. The government system was Parliament. Founded by Edward I in 1295, Parliament has stood in place for an extended period of time. Edward’s Model Parliament grew into the House of Commons and House of Lords. In addition to limiting monarchs, the Magna Carta kept a major check. In 1215, King John signed the Magna Carta. This historic document contained certain principles that limited the power of the English monarch and gave more to the people and nobles. Thus, monarchs could not ordain absolute rule. Furthermore, the Magna Carta gave law and basic rights such as jury trials and habeas corpus. Parliament and the Magna Carta remain consistencies of English history and kept checks on the monarchs of England. Likewise, the Church of England remained a constant for a long time. In addition, the monarch is instantly named the head of the Anglican Church of England. Monarchs, Parliament, the Magna Carta, and the…

    • 1077 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The authority of a monarchical power is not usually associated with limitations, but following the Norman conquest, the English kings faced a fluctuation of restrictions. While much of the threats to their sovereignty came from kingdoms from outside of their territory, perhaps the greater checks came from their own subjects. This did not mean that the rulers of England found themselves without any power to wield, but rather that they found themselves in a constant negotiation as to what their position actually allowed them to do. This back and forth was mainly with the nobility within England, and put into question the sovereign's authority to, dictate governmental enactments, to control the country's military, and to levy funds from the population.…

    • 1269 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The King also greatly affected their legislative powers. He wouldn't let people be elected, he caused innocent people to be convicted of crimes that they didn't commit, and he even made it so laws couldn’t be passed without his consent, but when the time would come for the law to be passed, the King wouldn’t show up. He would also call the legislative bodies together when he knew that the officers couldn't show up without difficulty.…

    • 375 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The rule of law is that no one is above the law. Aristotle claimed that the rule of law is above any rule of the individual. For example: a policeman…

    • 673 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    John Donne Outline

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages

    king and parliament would work together - limited monarcy: kings recognizing prerogatives of parliament, but also rights of people as a whole: Bill of Rights of 1689…

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Privy Chamber

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This is how I feel we should operate our decisions for our country and not by The Council’s choice. People close to the King will know how he is actually feeling towards each topic that could be brought…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays