Preview

Appeals Process Essay Example

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1846 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Appeals Process Essay Example
| APPEALS PROCESS | Describing the appeals process | | | 2/12/2012 |

Abstract
An appeal in the criminal law system is a defendant’s way of challenging the court’s decision. In this paper I will discuss what an appeal is, how it factors into the overall procedures and process of the criminal system. How the appeals process may be improved. Steps in the appeals process and an example case of an appeal. And why the example case appeal did or did not succeed.
Introduction
A defendant can challenge is conviction by filling an appeal to have the conviction overturned. The first appeal filed in most cases in the Federal System and most State Court systems is an appeal of the Statutory Right. If they lose the appeals under the statutory right they may then appeal to the State Supreme Court or the U.S. Supreme Court. But in most cases a defendant does not have the right to file such an appeal. The Supreme Court must agree to hear the defendant’s case. But defendant needs to remember that an Appeals Court is not automatically required to review a case.

What is an appeal?
An appeal is a petition to a higher court for review of a case that has already been decided by a lower court of law. The petition is made for the purpose of having the lower court’s decision overturned.

How do appeals factor into the overall criminal procedures and processes?
Merely filing an appeal does not automatically mean that a defendant will find it easy to have the court decision reversed. It is imperative that the defendant shows the court in the appeals process that the initial decision was incorrect or flawed in some way. This can be done by proving that the previous decision was made in error, or by bringing to light new evidence that was not offered in the initial trial.
Defendants need to know that appellate courts each have rules that control the appellate process. These rules are firm, and cover steps in the appeal and time limits. Appellate courts usually aren't

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    3)Did the court of appeal agree (uphold or affirm) the trial court’s ruling or did the court of appeal disagree (overturn or remand) the trial court’s ruling?…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Romeo phillion research

    • 2304 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Appeal refers to the appellant, sometimes called the plaintiff in error, must file a notice of appeal, along with the necessary documents, to commence appellate review. The person against whom the appeal is brought, the appellee, then files a brief in response to the appellant's allegations.(http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Appeal+(law) which means requesting a formal change to an official decision. In this case only one appeal had taken place.in 2009 Romeo Phillion sat through his first and last appeal. However, should this appeal even had taken place? The case was reopened in 2006, and in March 2009, the Ontario Court of Appeal overturned his 1972 murder conviction and granted him a new trial, in part because a 1968 police report establishing a clear alibi for Phillion had not been turned over to his defence lawyer. (trial.http://www.cbc.ca/news/background/phillion/) due to the fact that Phillion was wrongfully accused he should not have even had an appeal.…

    • 2304 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    KIN 3800 Mid Term

    • 1969 Words
    • 8 Pages

    3. The United States Supreme Court is very selective about the cases it chooses to hear. Those who wish to take their appeal to the Supreme Court must request…

    • 1969 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    References: Carp, Robert A., Ronald Stidham, and Kenneth L. Manning. "chapter 6." Judicial process in America. 8th ed. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press, 2011. 125. Print.…

    • 1011 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    We use it today to appeal state convictions to the federal courts when a person who has been…

    • 979 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    George Davis Case

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages

    . . . Under the doctrine, once an appellate court rules upon a question presented on appeal, litigants and lower courts become bound by the ruling, which is considered to be the law of the case . . . . Not only are lower courts bound by the law of the case, but decisions rendered by a prior appellate panel will generally govern the second appeal at the same appellate level as well, unless the previous decision is incorrect because it is out of keeping with controlling principles announced by a higher court and following the decision would result in manifest injustice.”…

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    An Appellate court and lower courts are two completely different things. However, they do have their similarities. They both are court trails and ways to go about proving a person right or wrong. In a Appellate court, normally the victim has done something very wrong and they normally do not get the chance to even begin to share their side of the story of what they think happened vs. what really may have happened. Court judges believe that the outcome of the trial should have been different, but if no errors were made, they will not overrule the lower court. The judges make their decisions based only on arguments of how the law should be and interpreted .…

    • 270 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Judicial review is a process that is conducted in the Supreme Court that hears an appeal over lawfulness of a case. It is not focused on the rights and wrongs of…

    • 1086 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hurst Error Analysis

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This Court did exactly that after the United States Supreme Court held that a jury must be allowed to consider nonstatutory mitigating circumstances in Hitchcock v. Dugger, 481 U.S. 393 (1987). In the wake of that decision, the State made essentially the same argument they are today: there was a Hitchcock violation, but the error was harmless. This Court rejected that line of argument because it refused to be bound by the face of the record. Instead, this Court permitted defendants who proffered evidence of the extent of the harm of the constitutional error to develop that evidence at a…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    See Booth v. Churner, 532 U.S. 731, 735 (2001) (affirming dismissal of prisoner’s claim for failure to exhaust where he “never sought intermediate or full administrative review after prison authority denied relief”); Thomas v. Wollum, 337 F.3d 720, 726 (6th Cir. 2003) (noting that a prisoner must appeal administrative rulings “to the highest possible administrative level”); Gibbs v. Bureau of Prisons, 986 F.Supp. 941, 943-44 (D.Md. 1997) (dismissing a lawsuit for failure to exhaust, where a federal prisoner did not appeal his administrative claim through all four stages of the BOP’s grievance…

    • 1648 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the course of American history, the late 1700s and early 1800s were the main eras when the abolition of slavery was most rooted for. After the Haitian Revolution, in which the former state of Saint Domingue freed itself from the rule of the French colony, abolitionists around the world began to rise up and form organizations and societies to grant freedom to slaves. Although it was an informal and gradual process, anti-slavery movements were successful through votes in Congress, consistent petitions, passed laws, and published literature. Most interestingly, both whites and blacks were involved in the abolitionist movements, and believed that the use of slaves was destroying the unity of the nation. One of the earliest and most notable…

    • 146 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Mitigating factors must be considered when examining the decision of the Supreme Court whenever they overturn previous courts decisions. This issue becomes more complex in the Juvenile System because of the relative infancy of this aspect of the American judicial system.…

    • 3690 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    State Supreme Court; the highest appellate court a State has. The State Supreme Court is tasked with taking appeals from the lower courts and helps determine how State law will be defined within the States boundaries. While every States Courts systems will differ, they are all tasked with determining how their specific State laws will be governed. Hence, different states have different laws they have this system in place to determine enforcement, prosecution and punishment on their respective laws.…

    • 569 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sentencing Offenders

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Grounds of appeal can be - new evidence - legal precedence, such as when an expert witness is proven to be wrong in his procedure…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Appeal Process

    • 816 Words
    • 2 Pages

    October 26, 2014 Appeal Process Paper When any defendant is found guilty, of any charge, is entitled to an appeal to at least one level of appellate court (Meyer, J Grant, D. 2003). An appeal is when a defendant has already been found guilty in court, and they decide to take it to a higher court in order to change the ruling (Meyer, J Grant, D. 2003). Basically it is a process that takes place, because the defendant and their attorney do not feel that the verdict given was accurate and that could be due to many different reasons. Appeals ensure that there was a fair trial given and no rights were violated (Meyer, J Grant, D. 2003). The appeal process begins very shortly after the trial, when the defense sends an appeal to the court. Appeals factor in to the overall criminal justice process, because in the end they can change laws or amendments. The Miranda rights are a great example of this. They came about after someone went back and challenged the court. It was then that the Miranda rights became part of the law and the criminal justice process. Just because a criminal goes to court and is decided guilty and is charged with whatever he/she was being charged with, does not mean that the process is over and he/she accepts the sentence and it is done. The defendant may decide something went wrong or he/she has a way of proving their innocence. Then they will submit an appeal and may ended up getting out of the original sentence given. This completely changes up the criminal procedures and processes. Based on my review of the appeal courts results in New Jersey, I think that the current appeals process is very effective. As per New Jersey Judiciary annual Report 2011- 2012 (n.d.), 6,461 appeals were received and 6,159 of those appeals have been decided. (Appellate Division of Superior Court). Mostly everyone appeal submitted to the New Jersey Appellate Courts has been resolved, therefore showing that the defendants are given a chance to have their case heard once…

    • 816 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays