Preview

Brown vs. Southall Realty Co.: Case Study

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
554 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Brown vs. Southall Realty Co.: Case Study
Brown v. Southall Realty Co.,
District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1968, 237 A.2d.

Parties:
Lillie Brown, Defendant, Appellant
Southall Realty, Plaintiff, Appellee
Mr. Penn, Owner
Judicial History:
The Plaintiff, Southall Realty, filed suit to evict the defendant, Lillie Brown, for unpaid rent. The defendant contested that the rent was unpaid due to an illegal contract that was in violation of sections 2304 and 2501 of the D.C. Housing Regulations. The trial court of the District of Columbia, granted judgment in favor of the Plaintiff. The Defendant appealed.
Facts:
The Defendant entered into a leasing agreement with Southall Realty. However, at the time of the agreement, Southall Realty was aware of Code violations 2304 and 2501 of the D.C. Housing Regulations that rendered the premises unsafe and unsanitary.
The entire basement of the house was deemed unsafe due to a broken railing and obstructed commode as well as insufficient height,
The Defendant, Lillie Brown, failed to pay two hundred and thirty dollars in rent and continued to live on the premises.
The Plaintiff, failed suit to evict the defendant from the premises for unpaid rent.
The owner, Mr. Penn, testified to having submitted a letter the D.C Housing Division stating that the basement was unoccupied and would remain unoccupied until the violations were corrected.
The defendant contested that rent was not due, due to the fact that the lease was illegal. Even though the defendant testified that the premises we habitable in spite of the Housing Regulation violations. She claimed the contract should be void due to the specific language in Section 2304 of the District of Columbia Housing Regulations stating: “No persons shall offer to rent any habitation, or the furnishings thereof, unless such habitation and its furnishings are in a clean, safe and sanitary condition, in repair, and free from rodents and vermin.”
The trial court ruled in favor of the Plaintiff and awarded

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In the first trial, the court found the Garretts liable to the tenants for substantive and procedural unconscionability. Tenants maintained that the new rental prices placed by the owners were above the fair market value of the lots. Moreover, most of the unit homes in the property were virtually unmovable and after years of depreciation most of them were not accepted by other mobile home parks. Therefore, even if the tenants wanted to leave, that was not reasonably doable due to the age of the units which made almost impossible the option for the tenants to find substitutes unless they purchase new mobile homes. The court declared procedural unconscionability due to the unfair bargaining position of the Garrets with respect to the tenants, and substantive unconscionability because there was proof that the rent charged was above the fair market rental…

    • 889 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    FACTS: Donnie McGraw signed a lease with Brown Realty Company located at 7307 South Westmorland Road, Dallas, Texas where he would be running a restaurant. On December 24, 2003 when McGraw signed the contract he agreed that the lease would be from February 15, 2004 through February 14, 2009 where he would be paying $3,450 a month a totaling $207, 000 at the end. On March 3, 2004 McGraw sent Gary Brown, the president of Brown Realty Company, a letter informing him of some equipment in need of repair in addition he sent him a second letter on October 5, 2004 complaining that the roof of the building was leaking, there was never a respond from Brown Realty. Documentation showed that McGraw made his rent payment on time from March through October of 2004; however in November rent payment was returned for insufficient funds which he then abandoned the premises in December.…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    -The facts: The Insurance Man selected some computer equipment and Hartland bought it and leased it to them with a price and a guarantor. The lease stated that Hartland made no warranties and the lessee should look to the vendor for any needed repairs. Lease payments were due regardless of condition of the machine. After problems arose the lessee stopped paying, Hartland sued but the trial judge concluded it was a contract of adhesion and ruled against Hartland, who appealed.…

    • 1305 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chi Hung Luu, appellee, leased premises in Houston Texas, from Merry Homes, Inc., with the intention of opening a bar or nightclub on the property. After Luu signed the lease, he submitted an application for a liquor license to the city of Houston. The city denied the application and Luu sought a declaratory judgment that the lease was void because it could not be performed legally. Merry Homes, appellant, counterclaimed for breach of contract and sought to recover eight months of unpaid rent.…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The court in this case did note that the landlord would not be in breach of §235-b if the tenants found the building to be unpleasing aesthetically. In Ludlow, Young the tenant was unable to use one of the apartments five essential functions. Application: In Ms. Bank’s situation, she was unable to use her apartment for its’ intended purposes because she left the evening the bugs were uncovered after having disposed of her mattress and other furniture.…

    • 1207 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    ISSUES: The court granted the motion, finding that the parties did not enter into a valid enforceable contract because (1) a material term of the alleged agreement was for Drew to pay a monetary price for the business (2) the parties never reached an…

    • 934 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The case selected is a construction defect case, Haynes v. Adair Homes, Inc. The case was lastly filed in the Court of Appeals of The State of Oregon. Hynes v. Adair Homes was initially filed in the Clackamas County Circuit Court. The plaintiffs Paul and Renee Haynes contracted with the defendant Adair Homes, Inc. for the construction of their home. After completion of the house, they discovered extensive water in the underfloor crawlspace. Ponding water in the crawlspace then led to mold inside the structure. Haynes filed a suit against Adair for breach of contract and negligence (law.justia.com, n.d.).…

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I spoke with Craig Ribbens, who is one of the insureds’ long-time tenants. Mr. Ribbens was cooperative and offered to help in any way that he could. However, the information that he provided was not very beneficial to our defense. The house that the plaintiffs rented is one of five that the insureds own in a small compound. Mr. Ribbens informed us that he did not know the plaintiffs, but heard from other tenants that they moved out because there was mold throughout their house. Although he never saw the mold, and has seen none in the house that he rents, he occasionally smells mold in his house in the past.…

    • 236 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    LAW575 Contract Paper

    • 1303 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Danny Davidson sold a single family home to Paul and Priscilla Peterson. A long-term relationship between Danny and Paul is the basis for not including a written agreement. The simple contract was made orally and only included the legal object and the amount to be paid. Danny did not disclose a dispute with his neighbor over boundary lines or include information about a soil subsidence in the front yard he claims not to have known about.…

    • 1303 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Roommates.com case brief

    • 563 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The court uses section 230 of the CDA to see if Roommates.com, LLC has immunity. The court uses this law to see if this case applies to RHA and state real estate discrimination law.…

    • 563 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The fourteen year old girl was not the legal owner or person responsible for the home, therefore permission from her was invalid. In addition, she did not…

    • 552 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    LGBTI Inmatess

    • 246 Words
    • 1 Page

    Your current housing assignment was done is accordance with the aforementioned policies. You have provided no evidence to substantiate your claims.…

    • 246 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Eleven months after moving into the home, Pat received the half-million dollar installment check. Pat immediately went to Dan with a check for $275,000 and asked Dan to convey the property to her according to their agreement. Dan refused to accept the check and ordered Pat to move out.…

    • 1017 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Eminence of Sleeping

    • 1539 Words
    • 7 Pages

    I. Summary Judgement cannot be given against any one with license to stay, i.e. lessees, tenants, and including over-stayed tenants as expressed out by our Federal Judges. It was this…

    • 1539 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In the 51 Olivia Road case[2], the court issued an interdict requiring that the city and the occupiers engaged with each other meaningfully. Both parties had to file affidavits as to how successful the engagement was.[3] The appellant claimed that the city was unreasonable in deciding to evict them, because the eviction would result in their homelessness. The court held that the municipality must have known that the eviction would leave the people homeless and they ought to have engaged meaningfully with the occupiers, particularly as the occupiers were vulnerable members of society with little education or money.[4] In such circumstances, it is only if reasonable efforts at meaningful engagement were tried but failed that the eviction may proceed. If the municipality does not do this, they are at odds with s26 (2) of the Constitution, which states that the state must take reasonable steps to ensure that everyone has access to adequate housing.[5] While a municipality may not always be able to provide adequate housing for everyone, they must make a reasonable effort at doing this. s26 (3) of the Constitution holds that all relevant steps must be taken prior to an eviction taking place.…

    • 1312 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics