Preview

Conflicting Perspectives: Julius Caesar & Gladiator Essay Example

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2867 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Conflicting Perspectives: Julius Caesar & Gladiator Essay Example
Discuss how conflicting perspectives on events, personalities and situations are represented in Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar and one related text.

Written in 1599, Shakespeare’s historical tragedy Julius Caesar portrays the conspiracy against Julius Caesar, his assassination and the defeat of the conspirators. Julius Caesar is one of the many Roman plays that Shakespeare wrote based on true events from Roman history. This play presents varying perspectives on not only characters such as Julius Caesar, but also on events and situations such as the assassination of Julius Caesar and the political instability and conflict in Rome. Gladiator, an epic film directed by Ridley – Scott, parallels Julius Caesar not only through story line, but correspondence can also be seen through characters. Through the use of literary as well as dramatic techniques, both Shakespeare and Ridley - Scott present many examples that convey the idea of conflicting perspectives.

Julius Caesar, a conquering Roman general and the target of the conspirators, is seen as a tyrant and megalomaniac by some such as Cassius and Brutus who plot against Caesar and murder him in what they believe to be for “the general good.” While speaking to Brutus in private, Cassius reveals his thoughts on Caesar, “…he doth bestride the narrow world like a Colossus, and we petty men walk under his huge legs and peep about.” Alluding to the immense statue of the god Apollo, the use of simile compares Caesar to this massive structure and creates the image of a tyrant. However, followers of Caesar such as Mark Antony and the mob seen in Act 1, Scene 1, depict a conflicting perspective of Caesar. The stage directions at the beginning of Act 1, Scenes 1 and 2 highlight Caesar’s power and the loyalty of the public towards him. “A public place. Flourish. Enter Caesar…a great crowd following” and also “Re – enter Caesar and his train,” emphasise the public’s sense of admiration shown towards Caesar. The public see Caesar as

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Cassius's perspective is very much that Caesar is a mere man and no better than any other Roman. 'I was born as free as Caesar, so were you.' His recollection of the time he saved Caesar from drowning had a great influence on his view on Caesar, “Tis true, this god did shake.” He ironically utilizes the term ‘god’ as he was astonished that a man of such physical weakness can now have the reputation of greatness, “'Ye gods, it doth amaze me / A man of such a feeble temper should / So get the start of the majestic world.” Cassius’ soliloquy exposes his deceit and manipulation, “Well, Brutus, thou art noble; yet I see Thy honourable metal may be wrought from that it is disposed.” His play on words showing his belief that he will be able to manipulate Brutus; honourable “mettle,” as if it were heated metal being changed into something new and finally target Caesar with his own loved companion. There is an element of personal jealousy in Cassius. It is evident in his metaphorical language:, 'Why, man, he doth bestride the narrow world / Like a Colossus and we petty men' His simile of ‘Colossus’ also produces imagery of the flawed Caesar. Cassius represents Caesar as a tyrant. Cassius takes it personally and will act on the matter. Therefore, through a variety of literary techniques, embedded in various character convictions and opposing views, Shakespeare is able to blur…

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Akin to the Salem Witch Trials that took place in 1692 and 1693, the assassination of the great Julius Caesar in William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar appeared to be unreasonable or unjust to many of those that honor him. However, unlike the notorious Salem Witch Trials, it is clear that as light manifests itself upon the mysterious reasons in regards to why Julius Caesar was brutally murdered, it is made obvious that Julius Caesar may not have been quite the adored and honorable man that the Romans so hoped for. There was a side to the Julius Caesar that remained hidden by his graciousness and utterly generous facade. This side of the great and almighty Caesar would prove to convince and compel the very Senators that served below him, that Caesar must meet his rather “timely” demise.…

    • 744 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    You are to produce a contribution to an online HSC Tutorial. You are to record and upload an answer to the question below. It is to be no longer than seven minutes and no less than five minutes.…

    • 1383 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Julius Caesar, a historical tragedy appeals to an audience fearing Elizabeth 1 imminent death without an heir and consequence civil war, religious conflict and external threats.  embodies his values in distinctive, engaging, contrasting characters and their relationship with each other…

    • 1311 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Lastly, the other thing that is similar is the plot of each. In short, these two pieces of…

    • 625 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    It portrays the 44 BC conspiracy against the Roman dictator Julius Caesar, his assassination and the defeat of the conspirators. Although the title of the play is Julius Caesar, Caesar is not the central character in its action; he appears in only three scenes, and is killed at the beginning of the third act. The protagonist of the play is Marcus Brutus, and the central psychological drama is his struggle between the conflicting demands of honor, patriotism, and friendship.…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    After Caesars death Antony requested to speak at his funeral. Antony was a very good friend of Caesar. In his eulogy, Antony denies accusations of Caesar being “too ambitious” and retorts with examples of how good of a man he really was in his eyes. Antony firmly believes Caesar was innocent and that his murder cannot be justified. He speaks to the Plebeians, the Roman people…

    • 369 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Every text is constructed for a purpose; the composer is trying to convey and embed their agenda into the reader by persuading them to accept their perspective on key events, personalities and/or situations. Through the manipulation of various textual forms, structures and language composers persuade their audience to adopt their perspective. Composers often decide to present conflicting perspectives to truly engage their audience. By demonstrating the concept of conflicting perspectives the composer is able to glorify their perspective in contrast to another to enforce their agenda, they position the audience through language to side with them. The tight narrative “Julius Caesar” by William Shakespeare’s utilises the final days of Caesar’s…

    • 1439 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Even in his absence or death, the manner in which characters address Caesar, describe him, and act in his presence, reveals the authority and influence he has over people's lives. From the first scene, Caesar is presented as victorious, having vanquished his rival, Pompey, and as an extremely popular figure among the people, with the commoners even defying authorities to celebrate his victory. As the play continues into scene ii, Caesar appears before the crowds as a modern-day pop-star, surrounded by a trail of subservient entourage. Casca and Antony display complete submission to Caesar, with the latter declaring that 'when Caesar says Do this! It is done' . In Caesar's absence, fellow patricians, Brutus and Cassius, describe him as 'mighty Caesar', a man who 'has now become a God', and strides in the world 'as a Colossus' . It is therefore evident that his close subordinates are jealously affected by his power, an effect which will later germinate into conspiracy. Even after his assassination, Caesar's ghost continues the task of perpetuating the fear of his everlasting power on those he influenced. Caesar holds enough power over his subjects that he is capable of influencing them continually, in his life and…

    • 1643 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    As Cicero states: “men may construe things after their fashion”, in the midst of subjective conflicting perspectives upon a certain personality, what would you draw from it? William Shakespeare lends this thought to the audiences of his time as well as ours through the play, Julius Caesar. Was Julius Caesar really the noblest man that ever lived, an ambitious tyrant, or both? Enhanced by the personal values of Cassius and Brutus, we can discover that studying the conflicting perspectives of Caesar and his power can bring us closer to the truth of his character whilst cultivating a more diverse and provocative insight to Shakespeare’s context and audience.…

    • 787 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Shakespeare’s interpretation of Julius Caesar’s assassination titled, Julius Caesar, a man named Cassius is attempting to get the help and alliance of a fellow Roman named Brutus in the conspiracy of assassinating the Roman leader. He accomplishes this in constructed and detailed monologues to persuade Brutus to join the conspiracy. In each of Cassius’ monologues, Cassius strategically uses appeals and rhetorical devices to ultimately give a successful and persuasive speech to his audience, Brutus.…

    • 895 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The exposition of Julius Caesar, Shakespeare immediately presents the ideals that underpin the differing views of Caesar’s rising power through his two protagonists, Brutus and Cassius. Both characters posses different interpretations on Caesar’s reign on Rome, one being loyal to Rome and a love and respect for Caesar “I love him well” but the other being a spiteful and vitriolic towards a “feeble old tyrant.” This highlights the notion of Cassius’s selfish prejudice towards his own contentment, which is only shown behind closed doors. Brutus on the other hand is victim to Cassius’ vitriol and becomes the pawn as he is manipulated “poor Brutus, with himself at war,” Brutus is troubled emotionally, torn by his patriotism and his respect for Caesar, above all he has an undying love for Rome, “Brutus had rather be a villager than to repute himself a son of Rome.” It is this love for Rome that causes such internal turmoil for Brutus, through Shakespeare’s use of juxtaposition of characters, he is able to highlight to the audience, the lengths that man will go to in order to…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Julius Caesar Flaws

    • 2477 Words
    • 10 Pages

    In act two scene two, Caesar receives word that the priests, upon performing a sacrifice, cannot find the sacrificed beast's heart. Caesar does not interpret this the way he should, which is to stay in his house away from threats, but instead thinks that “the gods do this in shame of cowardice.” Shortly afterward, Caesar reveals that wife Calphurnia saw his statue, “which, like a fountain with a hundred spouts, did run pure blood.” Caesar, under the sway of Decius, again misinterprets this bad omen to mean that his “statue spouting blood in so many pipes, in which so many smiling Romans bathed, signifies that from you great Rome shall suck reviving blood.” As Caesar is full of pride, he is constantly looking for signs of his superiority, and when Decius gives this interpretation, Caesar laps it up without a second thought. Caesar, who thinks himself immune to flattery, can be so easily flattered by anything that pertains to his pride. However, these mistakes are not enough to damn him. In the end, Caesar makes a fatal mistake by directly insulting the gods with the words “Hence! Wilt thou lift up Olympus?” Caesar implies that he is equal to the Olympians, and they, to teach him a lesson, send the senators to stab him. By including this line, Shakespeare provides…

    • 2477 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Julius Caesar is based on the story of the famous emperor’s assassination but William Shakespeare heightens the conspiracy which led to his death and threw light on the use of truth to reach one’s goal. As in a bipolar world made of good and evil, light and darkness, there is a duality between truth and lie in the play. How this dualism applies to Shakespeare’s work?…

    • 2900 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hamlet vs Gladiator

    • 1094 Words
    • 4 Pages

    William Shakespeare’s Hamlet is a tragic play where Prince Hamlet of Denmark wants to seek revenge for his father’s death that was murdered by his uncle and now his stepfather, as the murderer married his mother and King Hamlets’ wife named Claudius. Gladiator is a 2000 historical drama film directed by Ridley Scott where a loyal Roman general named Maximus Decimus Meridius is betrayed when the Emperor Marcus Aurellus’s son, Commodus murdered his father and seizes the throne. Between this play and the movie, they are quite similar within the character yet, there are differences as the character of the play and the movie, in terms of both dramas, various elements that makes them similar tragic figures. Within the theme of the story, the guilt in each character feels and their death makes them different from each other.…

    • 1094 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays