Contrast/Comparison done for two oppositely opinionated text's

Contrast/Comparison done for two oppositely opinionated text's Let’s say that Kavanaugh is writer A and that Reed is writer B. Within both passages they each argue over the differences of America’s law’s regarding immigration. Kavanaugh would say that people leave Mexico for its violent and hostile lands, that is why, “We Should Blame Mexico.” However Reed would say that while Mexico is far from the best country of course and that its Americas fault from telling them all the things that they could gain/benefit, from illegally immigrating to the America and that its Americas fault from not cracking down on their defenses so thats “Why We Shouldn’t Blame Mexico.” In the case of reading them both, its easy to see how someone could either be persuaded to see either side of the argument or in my case, to see both sides. After reading both texts it was easy to see for me, how the issue at hand can be taken out of context and filtered through into either sides persuasive literary argument. Personally it’s always been easy to see the issues that separate two topics, then to see the differences within the outlined thought’s that have been written within the different papers. After reading both papers it’s easy to conclude that it will always be hard to try and do the most humane thing for any living creature, but not to endanger the natural creatures already existing within that places way of life. Sometimes argument’s and fights break out and its not easy to find the correct solution if one does exist at all. Both writers A and B this time around are trying to have their cake and eat it too, an expression of which that has never worked out. My perspectives upon Immigration have neither changed nor differed. Immigration is bad when it inhibits the natural born Americans. However just as Reed stated, we basically bait them and then give the thousands that do cross more than their own government can ever hope or try to aid them with. While its Americas fault for giving them benefits and rights in small amounts, its Mexico’s fault for not being a better place and offering more aid to their people within the country. Both of the writers are correct in their assessments, however neither is trying to come together to even consider finding a good solution.