Preview

Crim

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1263 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Crim
Philosophy 001: Introduction to Logic and Critical Thinking

SEMESTER: Fall 2014
INSTRUCTOR: Dr. Jennifer Johnson
EMAIL: FIC portal or Johnson@sfu.ca
OFFICE HOURS: Thurs. 12:30pm-1:30pm

PREREQUISITES
There are no prerequisites for this course.

OBJECTIVES/COURSE OVERVIEW
This course is an introduction to the evaluation of arguments as they are encountered in everday life. The central aim will be to improve the student’s reasoning skills by understanding how arguments work and to learn to distinguish those which actually prove what they set out to demonstrate from those which do not. The course includes the study of basic types of reasoning, the structure of arguments, and the standard by which we determine whether an argument is strong or weak.

Learning Objectives and Outcomes

The aim is for students to learn:
The role and importance of arguments
How to classify arguments by type
How to recognize when arguments are being offered
How to recognize the strengths of good arguments, and the weaknesses of bad ones
How to recognize common errors in reasoning

REQUIRED TEXT

Merilee Salmon, Introduction to Logic and Critical Thinking, 6th edition. Wadsworth Publishing. ISBN: 9781133049753

COURSE ASSESSMENT
Your grade will be based on your performance on three exams and on your in-class behavior.

Evaluation and their weights are as follows:

First in-class exam 20%
Second in-class exam 30%
Final exam 40%
Attendance and participation 10%

The final exam is cumulative. It will be scheduled by FIC.

Note: the weight of the exams is not open to modification. This means-if you do poorly on the first in-class exam you CANNOT transfer the 20% weight of that exam to the final. Each exam will be worth the percentage that is listed on this course outline.

Note: You must write the in-class exams with the class in which you are officially registered. I teach 4 sections of philosophy 001 this term, but you can

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    ITIS 1P98 Assignment2

    • 1999 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The weighting for the final exam must be at least 1.5 times the weighting for the midterm exam.…

    • 1999 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this paper I will be discussing two arguments models; one is from a philosopher‘s view and the other is from a psychologist’s view. I will explain how and why these models are important. I will also discuss my understanding of the thinking and justification of each model of argument by compare and contrasting the two arguments.…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Mgmt1001 Assignment 1

    • 2044 Words
    • 9 Pages

    | Logical analysis and evaluation of arguments, theory and information. Insightful analysis shows depth of understanding and development of own ideas.Marks: 26.5 - 35…

    • 2044 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mgmt 516 Syllabus

    • 1218 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Your grade is indicated based on your performance in two tests, a term project, and class participation/case discussions.…

    • 1218 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Adele Douglas and J. Kenji Lopez-Alt both start their argumentative piece by defining who their argument is targeted to as well as what they will be arguing. Over the course of the two contrasting papers, they both use similar and contrasting methods to try and convince the reader of their opinion. By doing this, a number of flaws as well as good techniques can be seen in both writings.…

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    History 1301 Syllabus

    • 2855 Words
    • 15 Pages

    of your final grade. All exams must be completed or the student will automatically fail the course.…

    • 2855 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    An argument is a means to a solution. Thank You For Arguing by Jay Heinrichs shows readers how best to win an argument with 28 concepts. Three concepts that I believe are most important in the development of a successful argument are set your goals, speak your audience’s language, and finally give a persuasive talk.…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Eco 212

    • 2018 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Final grades will be determined by your performance in the exams, oral presentations, project and the class participation. Homework is assigned but will not be collected…

    • 2018 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Auburn

    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages

    An argument is an attempt to resolve a set of two or more conflicting assertions through an appeal to reason. In an argument, one not only acknowledges the facts, but also explores ones own ideas. In short, an Argument is the process of finding a solution through the dialectic exchange of ideas. In the article, Rodgers sets up an over powering but nonetheless effective Argument.…

    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Eng Comp. II

    • 1626 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Arguments that support the position. Arguments: why do you think this or that is true or false.…

    • 1626 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    PY4 WJEC

    • 6916 Words
    • 25 Pages

    To get full marks your argument needs to be presented in a structured manner, clearly interpreted and analysed, you need to have range and depth of evidence, reasoned conclusion, use appropriate terms throughout. Up to 15 marks will be awarded for this (AO3).…

    • 6916 Words
    • 25 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    1. In order to argue effectively, the arguer must first set a personal goal, and then play an active role in setting the goals of the “audience”.…

    • 1800 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Rhetorical Analysis

    • 353 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This assignment asks you to analyze an argumentative article, editorial, essay, etc. using the criteria in our text. By analyzing the Ethos of the author and source, the Logos, Pathos, Language, Tone and Style of the piece, determine if you thought the argument was weak or strong and explain why. You are NOT responding to or writing about the subject of the argument. You are analyzing the strength of the author’s argument. In other words, your opinion about the subject does not matter. Consider yourself an objective observer whose job it is to report to your reader whether the author makes a strong or weak argument and explain why you feel this way. Summarize the article and provide context in your introduction so the reader can understand the situation, then analyze the appeals, the language, tone and style. Below is a checklist you should follow:…

    • 353 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    This argument knows its audience well and succeeds in reaching it. It keeps its points brief and informally worded; it explains to the presumably uninformed; and it utilizes ethos and logos to educate an audience that wants to be educated, then leaves them with a piece of new information to ponder and carry with…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the world today, the word “argument” is used on a daily basis and usually carries a bad meaning. In fact, the word is used so much that people often mistaken it’s true meaning. According to the book Writing Arguments by John Ramage, John Bean and June Johnson, there is no universally accepted definition of “argument.” The meaning of the term is rather complex, and it has been remained a controversial issue of philosophers and rhetoricians over the centuries (2). Because of the complexity of the word, we need to examine three important points in order to understand what “argument” truly meant: the misconceptions about the meaning of argument, the features of argument, and the relationship of argument to the problem of truth.…

    • 409 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays