Preview

Crim Pro outline

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
19298 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Crim Pro outline
Criminal Procedure
1-15-14
Chapter 2. Confessions and Interrogations
A. Voluntariness of Confessions
-based on the 14th amendment that contains both the Privileges and Immunities Clause, DPC (Due Process Clause) and the EPC (Equal Protection Clause).
Whether the accused’s will was overborne at the time he confessed?
Ct. look at a totality-of-the circumstances analysis-
1. The conditions of the interrogation
a. Use of force or threat
b. Promise of favor
c. Deception or trickery regarding the facts
d. Deception regarding rights
e. Isolation
f. Disregard of necessities of life, such as food or sleep
g. Deprivation of counsel, if required
h. Illegal detention
i. No warnings regarding rights, if required
j. Taking advantage of a vulnerable suspect
2. The characteristics of the suspect
a. Age
b. Education
c. Mental capacity
d. Experience/familiarity in the criminal justice system
e. Physical and mental state
i. While a susceptible mental condition of the person is a factor to be weighed in the balance, suppression is appropriate only where it can be demonstrated that the police exploited that condition by means of coercion and that the confession resulted from the exploitation

Challenging a confession under the voluntariness standard therefore requires a showing that:
The police subjected the suspect to coercive conduct AND
The conduct was sufficient to overcome the will of the suspect (incorporates totality-of-the circumstances analysis)
*the more vulnerable the suspect, the more likely that a confession obtained by police will be suppressed*
Brown v. MS, U.S. (1936) (C.J. Hughes) (p 21)
Facts: The Defendants were found guilty and sentenced to death for the murder of Raymond Stewart. The Defendant’s Counsel moved for a “new trial’ at the Supreme Court of the State (MS) claiming that the evidence was inadmissible because it violated the DPC of the 14th Amendment. The Defense Counsel asserted that the (1) confession was procured

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Defense attorney may argue based on two precedents of US Supreme Court - Booth v. Maryland (1987) and South Carolina v. Gathers (1989) and state that this testimony is irrelevant to the crime itself and is not connected to the facts of the case and also victim’s testimony is unacceptable during death penalty cases. But US Supreme Court overruled these two precedents by its decision on Payne v. Tennessee case (1991). This decision holds that testimony on the form of a victim impact statement is admissible during the sentencing phase of a trial and, in death penalty cases, does not violate the Cruel and Unusual Punishment…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Are the same statutes in violation of the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment?…

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Unit 4 study guide

    • 543 Words
    • 2 Pages

    6. 14th amendment- all people born in US are citizens; states must provide ‘equal protection of the laws;” disqualified former confed. leader; penalized states with the loss of representation, if any member is denied or kept from voting.…

    • 543 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Regina Knight Case

    • 1974 Words
    • 8 Pages

    In order for a trial to be brought, the police and prosecutors might be able to prove that the elements of the particular offence are present. In this criminal case both Actus reus, Mens rea as well causation was clearly shown through the behavior of Katherine Knight.…

    • 1974 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Sheppard Case

    • 1274 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The petitioner filed for habeas corpus relief in the federal courts. The question was whether Sheppard was deprived of a fair trail and his right to due process according to the Sixth Amendment. Was the petitioner denied a fair trail for the second-degree murder of his wife, of which he was convicted, because of the trail judge’s failure to protect Sheppard sufficiently from the massive, pervasive, and prejudicial publicity that attended his prosecution?…

    • 1274 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Brief

    • 1484 Words
    • 6 Pages

    This case in Fenton, Missouri involves 17 yrs. old Christopher Simmons born in 1993. Charles Benjamin and John Tessmer were Christopher Simmons friends and accomplices. Christopher Simmons planned and committed a capital murder along with Charles Benjamin. The plan was to commit burglary and murder by breaking and entering, tying up Shirley Crook, and tossing her off a bridge. The three boys met at 2am in the morning however, Tessmer then dropped out of the plan. Simmons and Benjamin broke into Mrs. Crook's home, bound her hands and covered her eyes. They put Mrs. Crook in a minivan drove her to a state park and threw her off a bridge. Once the case was brought to trial court, the evidence was solid and overwhelming. Simmons had confessed to the murder, performed a videotaped reenactment at the crime scene, and there was testimony from John Tessmer against him that showed premeditation. After the crime Christopher discussed the plot in advance and later bragged about the crime. After 2 hours of investigation Christopher broke down and confessed. At trial the State introduced Simmons confession and the videotaped reenactment of the crime, along with testimony that Simmons discussed the crime in advance and him bragging to fellow classmates about it later. The defense called no witnesses due to the evidence and confession. The jury having returned a verdict of murder, the trial proceeded to the penalty phase. The jury returned a guilty verdict. The jury recommended a death sentence in which the trial court imposed despite Christopher not having a criminal background. The State charged Simmons with burglary, kidnaping, stealing, and murder in the first degree. Simmons was 17 at the time of the crime. He was outside the criminal jurisdiction of Missouri’s juvenile court system. Charles Benjamin and was…

    • 1484 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Law Quiz Chapter 1

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A clause to the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments that says no person shall be deprived of "life, liberty or property" without due process of the law. Page 118…

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sacco And Venzetti Essay

    • 603 Words
    • 3 Pages

    was found guilty of this crime and it was detrimental to the murder case. Not only was…

    • 603 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In order to understand the cases that brought about the drastic change in the interpretation of the 14th Amendment, the three clauses of the 14th Amendment must be understood. These clauses help define what it means to be a U.S. citizen. The privileges or immunities clause was first written in Article IV section two. It was then written again in the 14th Amendment after slavery was abolished in order for equal protection guarantee. The federal government wanted to insure that states respected the rights and freedoms of former slaves. In the first section of the 14th Amendment it states, “no state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United states.” This clause was written so that…

    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    This further illustrates that police officers can use multiple tactics other than simple questioning such as deception, a list of narratives, and open-ended questions. Suspects might admit that committing the crime for multiple reasons including mental illness, desire for attention, and to protect loved ones. Corroborated and nonpublic facts are based on police not disclosing facts to the public and how the confessions can be contaminated through the police or expert evidence can all lead to false confessions (Garrett,…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    No concrete evidence is shown in this trial. The only thing considered is what people say. By using a “he said verses she said” trial Lee…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Different ways of interrogations are used by officers to deal with suspects. Most often we do not know what is going on inside the interrogation room. The main purpose of the interrogation is to get possible answers that pacify their need of evidence to the case. Police are most criticizes of their way handling interrogations during custodial questioning which often uses deception to get whatever evidence needed. According to Skolnick and Leo there are eight types of interrogations deceptions. Interview versus interrogate which is the most subtle way of deception. Most often overlooked strategy the police always employ on suspects. By telling the suspects that he is free and can leave any time thus engages him to voluntary answering of questions that otherwise be considered an interrogation into a non-custodial interview. Miranda Warning, in order for a questioning to be custodial, police recite their Miranda rights. This routinely delivered phrase is always delivered in a recital flat monotone of voice that makes this warning a bureaucratic ritual. Police sometimes used this warning to soften up suspects. The Court in Miranda that police cannot trick or deceive a suspect into waiving Miranda rights. The misrepresenting the nature or seriousness of the Offense which police exaggerate, overstate or understate the offense in order for the suspect to compel in answering questions during custody. Role playing where police play the role of a compassionate friend, bother or father figure who understands the suspect’s situation in order to have their trust then later on seek the opportunity to let the suspect confess for the good of the investigation. Misinterpreting the moral seriousness of the offense is the heart of the interrogation method that propounded by Inbau, Reid and Buckley’s influential police training manual. Police interrogating the case offer suspects excuses or moral justification for their misconduct by providing the suspect with an external attribution…

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    There have been differences between the two contrasting types of models for the criminal justice system. Both models see the Constitution for the basics of it, but neither model is free from error. There are a sparse attributes of the two models where they can…

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Justice Brennan’s opinion in, In re Winship, explicitly recognized the reasonable doubt standard for criminal defendants. 7 That opinion elevated the protection associated with the longstanding application of the proof beyond a reasonable doubt standard in criminal prosecutions to constitutional status.8 After Winship, as a general rule, under the due process clauses of both the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments, the prosecution must prove to a jury, beyond a reasonable doubt, every fact necessary to constitute the crime, the state has charged the defendant.9 The Supreme Court has struggled, however, over the past three decades to find the precise contours of this constitutional protection. Despite repeated attempts, the Supreme Court continues to struggle to find the appropriate balance between protecting defendant rights10 and ensuring legislative autonomy in the drafting of criminal statutes.11 The long line of Sixth Amendment cases considering which factual questions must be resolved by juries beyond a reasonable doubt and which questions may be resolved by judges by a preponderance of evidence “has produced a bewildering series of distinctions.”12…

    • 8780 Words
    • 36 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Criminal Justice Outline

    • 1670 Words
    • 7 Pages

    When a person is interrogated it means they are taken into custody and await trial, arraignment, and facing a judge to determine their punishment and enter their plea. In the future of most criminals they are looking at a sentence to serve for the punishment of the law they broke, or crime they committed. These sentences have specific and general deterrence as well as guidelines that the constitution says we must follow. The federal sentencing guidelines are the most controversial and most complex of all the sentencing reform efforts. (Rubuck, 2001).…

    • 1670 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays