Preview

D'Amore's Fragrances Inc.

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1307 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
D'Amore's Fragrances Inc.
Case Study #4
Rich Rogers, Les Ford, and Jasmine Young all worked for Darius D’Amore’s Fragrances, Inc. During the employment there, they believed they were discriminated against and filed a $70 million lawsuit.
The antidiscrimination laws concerning the workplace that fit this case are Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Civil Rights Act of 1991, and Pregnancy Discrimination Act of 1978. The ADA of 1990 prohibits discrimination based on disability. In this case, the firm violated this act by not promoting Rogers because he had stage four lung cancer. The Civil Rights Act of 1991 awards punitive damages when the injuring party intentionally harms the other.
In my opinion, the plaintiffs do have a prima facie case for discrimination. On many accounts Rogers, Ford, and Young have spoke out about how they feel and their interest in other jobs that would come with more responsibility, money and status. The upper level management did not do anything to help them even though they have a strong internal recruitment policy. When they complained about feeling discriminated against and treated unjust, they were told to let things slide and to just ignore it. There are no clear, justifiable reasons as to why they were not promoted so I do think they have a case.
If I was the judge for the case, my verdict would be to find the defendant guilty on accounts of discrimination. I would award the plaintiff the $70 million they asked for. Depending on how well the defendant’s business was doing financially, this could have possibly caused them to go bankrupt. Nobody should feel unwelcomed at work or feel as if they cannot progress in a company because of their gender, race, or if they have a disability. This has been the law for several years and it is up to the judicial system to enforce it and to punish those who try get around the law and not follow it. The reason why I would award them the $70 million is because that is the amount of money that would make them happy

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Lilly Ledbetter was one of the very few female supervisors at the Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. plant in Gadsden, Alabama, and she worked at that plant for nineteen years, from 1979 till her retirement in 1998. Initially, when she started working for the company, her pay was equal to that of the other male supervisors. However, as time passed the pay discrepancy between Ledbetter and her 15 male counterparts was stark: the lowest she received was $3,727 per month, while the lowest paid male received $4,286. Thus, after realizing this Mrs. Ledbetter filed an official complaint before the EEOC in March 1998, stating that Goodyear violated the Title VII as they paid her a discriminatory low salary due to her sex. After she filed an official complaint, her case went to trial, and the jury concluded that the pay disparity was due to intentional discrimination. However, the Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit reversed the jury verdict, as it claimed Mrs. Ledbetter’s’ case was not filed in time, as the original discriminatory pay decision occurred before the statutory limitations of 180 days.…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Yes, it is clear to me how and why the judge was able to include those who were not specificity directed by the company’s actions to be included in the outcome of the ruling. Title VII was put in place to help protect minorities in the workplace and those in search of employment. This Act which was passed in 1964, prohibits discriminations in regards to the process of hiring, firing, and training, promoting and disciple along with the advertisement of open positions. This Act also includes any workplace decisions that are based on an employees or an applicant’s race, gender, national origin, or religion. The Title VII Act goes as far as including hiring, pay, and the terms of employment, available training layoffs and benefits. The Local 28 Steel Metal Workers had their hiring and promotion system worded and set up so that only white males would be interested, accepted and feel comfortable in applying for the apprenticeship position along with the ability to move up the union ladder into the union and journeymen position. The goal of the apprenticeship was to find themselves in the local 28 union. This process was set to up to discourage minority’s (specifically black males) from applying. Thus the sheet metal group local 28 was not only in violation of the Title VII Act but also the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), The court system (attempted) to step in to make the sheet metal workers union of local 28 compliant with the (EEOC) and the Title VII Act without success as eighteen years the steel workers were still not compliant with the courts orders.…

    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chapter 39 Questions

    • 608 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This case involves itself within The National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). The NLRA allows employees the right to form a union, to bargain collectively through a representative chosen on their own, and etc. Hence, employers have their rights but also obligations under the NLRA. The NLRA does not allow employers to discriminate or take part in any unfair…

    • 608 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wgu Est1 Task 1

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages

    It involves many protection barriers such as, giving citizens with disabilities equal rights as anyone of any race, religion and gender. It also requires employers to make appropriate accommodations to the work environment to help aid disability workers move around easier. In the Scenario, the applicant was denied employment because to accommodate their need to move around in the building, the company would have to renovate their elevators. The company chose to deny the applicant because it would cause undue hardship for the company. The requirement for the ADA is the company that the employer must have at least 15 or more employees. In this scenario, there was a violation that occurred because the company claimed that the $2,000 would be a hardship. A company with 75 employees can afford the cost to accommodate the applicant. If the company decides not to comply with the applicant, the applicant can decide to sue the company because of the ADA. This would cost more than the $2,000 to change the…

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    According to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, employees are protected from harassment and reprisal, based on their race, national origin, religion and gender. In addition, The Americans with Disabilities Act defends any disabled workers. If at any time a worker of Mr. Stonefield’s requires special equipment to enable his job performance, Mr. Stonefield is required to provide reasonable accommodations. – such as?…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    For starters, when it came to the interviewing process, there were 5 white officials and 1 black which showed that the room was not balance. Next, when it came to the scoring, he received lower scores than the whites. The next issue that showed discrimination was when it came to the attendance record of the workers. Two of the workers who were Caucasian, had the same attendance as Dunlap, and they received a better ranking. Also, Dunlap had a perfect safety record and received a score of a 4; while a white applicant who was at the job for eleven, had 2 accidents within those years and received a score of…

    • 1228 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The legal issue in this case is about David Dunlap the plaintiff who has been faced with discrimination on the basis of race in the interview at Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) during the employment process of this company. Mr. Dunlap is an African American man whom has worked for many years as foreman through contract for the union. He has worked as a contractor with the union at Tennessee Authority as a boiler man for over twenty years including fifteen years as a foreman. He has applied for employment at TVA numerous times since 1970 and was not once offered an interview. Mr. Dunlap has established that regardless of experience and during the hiring development, the company has allowed racial favoritism. The court has to recognize if the business is legally responsible under title VII of the civil rights act of 1964 for racial bias with intent. Mr. Dunlap has claimed the case under disparate impact and disparate treatment investigation. (Walsh, 2010)…

    • 1097 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In every case involving a minority defendant, it is a good policy to insure that no discrimination was involved at any point. The evidence is just too strong that, even in the 21st century discrimination is still present in our justice system. However, while it is obvious that must be an issue in some cases almost all the evidence in this case points to the defendants…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 makes it illegal to discriminate against someone on the basis of their race, color, religion, national origin, or sex . This law provides legal recourse for employees to seek Constructive Discharge for discrimination of their legal rights if they believe a change to a policy or procedure has violated their rights (Shaker, n.d.). The law specific to religious beliefs applies to this situation that has occurred within the company.…

    • 1674 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    James, E., & Wooten, L. (2006). Diversity crises: How firms manage discrimination lawsuits. Academy Of Management Journal, 49(6), 1103-1118. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2006.23478091…

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Based on Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 employers are not allowed to discriminate against a potential employee based on race, color, sex, religion, or national origin. In the Dunlap v. Tennessee Valley Authority case this title of the civil rights act was violated. An African American man named David Dunlap who gave almost the exact same answers as white candidates who got the job and who had 20 years of experience in boiler making was not chosen for any of the 10 positions available with the TVA. The issue is not only that he wasn’t hired but based on the score sheet he was highly discriminated against. When asked how many days he missed Dunlap told the employers that he never missed days unless sick or having a family emergency, two other candidates who just so happened to be white gave almost the exact same answer. On the score sheet for this question Dunlap was given a score of 3.7 while the other two potential employees were given scores of 4.2 and 5.5. Also when he was asked about how many accidents he had in the field he replied none and was given a low score but another candidate whom had at least two accidents was given a higher score than Dunlap. The issue at hand was that, his score sheet was heavily manipulated putting him in number 14 out of the 21 candidates that had applied. The top ten got hired.…

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Laws310

    • 363 Words
    • 2 Pages

    3) The judge has made a judicial error by allowing the Plaintiff 's counsel to comment on the case about Minichiello 's boss being a German with an "attitude of hatred" and made forced analogies to Nazi Germany and the Holocaust. The judge also allowed irrelevant testimony, which asserted that the Club discriminated against Latinos, Jews, and African-Americans, to the issue of discrimination based on sexual orientation. I agree that awarding $20,000,000 was grossly excessive and has no rational basis, and was an error by the judge as well.…

    • 363 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Discrimination within the place of work has been a concern for a long time now. Despite the fact that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits companies from showing favoritism to employees on account of their sex, age, race, and disability. Various employers continue to demonstrate this style of performance through the hiring procedure. American Disabilities Act also known as ADA was another organization put into effect after Affirmative Action. ADA is designed to defend and protect those individuals with disabilities. Both Affirmative Action and ADA were designed to create and uphold equality within the workplace. In this paper I will Compare the two, explain how they were developed and why they were developed. I will also explain who started this movement. Lastly I will list the pros and cons of these movements and discuss the way they have helped the cause.…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Unlawful to discriminate against current or prospective employees who have a disability or who have had a disability in the past, employer has duty to make reasonable adjustments.…

    • 1524 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Law and Environment

    • 260 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The judge has made a judicial error by allowing the Plaintiff's counsel to comment on the case about Minichiello's boss being a German with an "attitude of hatred" and made forced analogies to Nazi Germany and the Holocaust. The judge also allowed irrelevant testimony, which asserted that the Club discriminated against Latinos, Jews, and African-Americans, to the issue of discrimination based on sexual orientation. I agree that awarding $20,000,000 was grossly excessive and has no rational basis, and was an error by the judge as well.…

    • 260 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays