Preview

D. Melanogaster Lab Report

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1039 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
D. Melanogaster Lab Report
Mrs. Strait
Period 7 1-9-12

Drosophila Melanogaster: Predicting Traits Lab Report

The purpose of this study is to get an accurate look on how genetics work, and to practice determining the different traits within the species. D. melonogaster are useful because they are easily cultured and they reproduce very quickly. The eye color data supports past genetics problems because it can be predicted, and used in Punnett squares to aid in the prediction. If the P generation consists of a purebread red eyed fly(dominant) and a purebread sepia eyed fly (recessive), then the F1 generation will be heterozygous and produce an F2 generation with mostly red eyed, but some sepia eyed flies.

Prediction: Since the P generation and its F1 offspring is red eyed, and the F1 generation had some heterozygous flies, it can be predicted that the eye color is an autosomal trait. Also, certain colors are not restricted to a certain gender. Red eye color is most likely dominant because the P generation was a purebread red, and a purebread sepia fly, and their offspring was all heterozygous red. It can also be predicted that through the generations, the dominant eye color will be red, though the recessive sepia color will eventually appear.

Materials: • Vials • Flynap • Label • Drosophila Handbook • D. Melanogaster flies • Fly Food

Methods: Independent Variable: Parental (F1) Eye Color Dependent Variable: Offspring (F2) Eye Color Control Group: Punnett Squares Controlled Variables: Same food, living quarters, species and Flynap. 1. Observe phenotypes of the flies in your given vial. 2. Fill out a label for your new empty vial. 3. Place the label on the new vial. 4. Wait for teacher to feed flies. 5. Place the first vial on its side and gently transfer 5 male and 5 female flies into your new vial. 6. Put plug in your new vial. Leave the vial on its side at the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Daphnia Lab

    • 1155 Words
    • 5 Pages

    10. After each test remove the Daphnia into a provided beaker and throw away the cotton fibers.…

    • 1155 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    2. The phenotypes I observed in the F1 cross was the reddish eyes that came from the “wild type” father. This is because “wild type” trait is dominant. So the “brown eye” trait does not show in the offspring. In addition, the “wild type” body color from the mother was dominant, so this is what showed in the offspring, instead of the “ebony” coloring from the father.…

    • 513 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In addition to wild-type flies, 29 different mutations of the common fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster, are included in FlyLab. The 29 mutations are actual known mutations in Drosophila. These mutations create phenotypic changes in bristle shape, body color, antennae shape, eye color, eye shape, wing size, wing shape, wing vein structure, and wing angle. For the purposes of the simulation, genetic inheritance in FlyLab follows Mendelian principles of complete dominance. Examples of incomplete dominance are not demonstrated with this simulation. A table of the mutant phenotypes available in FlyLab can be viewed by clicking on the Genetic Abbreviations tab which appears at the top of the FlyLab homepage. When you select a particular phenotype, you are not provided with any information about the dominance or recessiveness of each mutation. FlyLab will select a fly that is homozygous for the particular mutation that you choose, unless a mutation is lethal in the homozygous condition in which case the fly chosen will be heterozygous. Two of your challenges will be to determine the zygosity of each fly in your cross and to determine the effects of each allele by analyzing the offspring from your…

    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    25.) When Thomas Hunt Morgan crossed his red-eyed F1 generation flies to each other, the F2 generation included both red and white-eyed flies. Remarkably, all the white-eyed flies were male. What was the explanation for this result?…

    • 495 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chem Lab.

    • 520 Words
    • 3 Pages

    8. Add 10 to 15mL of acid to your vial and record the ending volume on your lab sheet.…

    • 520 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    BIOL Lab2

    • 326 Words
    • 2 Pages

    5- If you performed the Drosophila cross LL × ll, what phenotypic ratio would you expect among the offspring?…

    • 326 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1. In fruit flies, long wings are dominant to short wings. Complete a cross between a short winged male and a heterozygous female.…

    • 337 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In vial one, a wild type hyper female Drosophila and wild type mellow male Drosophila were crossed respectively to determine the dominant behavioural phenotype. The first reciprocal cross was then carried out in vial two to define whether or not the behavioural phenotype is x-linked recessive. According to the results obtained from vial one, when the wild type hyper female and wild type mellow male was crossed, the resulting offspring’s phenotypes were all wild type hyper. This cross shows that the hyper behavioral phenotype can be considered dominant in comparison to mellow.…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    aafassd

    • 446 Words
    • 2 Pages

    7. In flies, long wings (L) is dominant over short wings (l). Complete these four Punnett squares showing different crosses. Then, shade red all of the offspring with long wings. Leave all the short wing offspring unshaded.…

    • 446 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fruit Fly Lab Report

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The class was given vials with adult fruit flies of P1 parent generation to look at the traits, one generation was homozygous, wild type eyes and dumpy wings. The other one was homozygous for sepia eyes and normal wings. These were crossed to yield the F1 generation which is crossed to produce the F2 generation.…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Science Lab

    • 562 Words
    • 3 Pages

    5. Add to the test tubes on at a time and observe. After 5 minutes, repeat your observations.…

    • 562 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Our TLC plate showed all colours expressed by the pteridine pigments for the wild-type Drosophila as expected (Figure 1). The sample A mutant which was a bright-red eye mutant also expressed the same pigments as our wild-type. Compared to the wild type, sample A pigment spots were lower intensity in colour under the UV light (Figure 2). Sample B was a brown-eye phenotype that showed no pigments except for a very faint 2-amino-4-hydroxypterin pigment (Figure 2). This was probably the result of human error because it was expected that there would be no pigments shown on the TLC plate for the brown-eye mutant. Furthermore, sample C which was the white-eyed mutant where no pigments were expected; however, our actual results did not reflect this. Instead our TLC plate faintly expressed Isoxanthopterin (violet-blue) for the white eye mutant (Figure 2). This was most likely due to human error. Moreover, the pigments found for sample D which was the dark-brown grey phenotype were: Isosepiapterin, Biopterin, 2-amino-4-hydroxypterin, and Isoxanthopterin and was lacking Sepiapterin, Xanthopterin, and Drosopterin (Figure 1). The Sepiapterin and Xanthopterin pigment was expected to show on the TLC plate (Figure 1) but unfortunately our plate did not reflect this. Again, this could be due to human error during the experiment. The Rf values for the pteridine pigment spots were similar for both the wild type and mutants of Drosophila. The wild type and sample A (bright-red eye mutant) had very similar Rf values for all the pigments (Table 1). Conversely, the Rf values for Isosepiapterin, Isoxanthopterin and Sepiapterin for the wild-type were slightly higher than those same pigments of sample A (Table 1). The 2-amino-4-hydroxypterin spot for sample B (Brown-eye) was close in value to the other…

    • 1483 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Fruit Fly Lab Report

    • 1348 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Looking at all of the fruit flies, there is no possible way for the parent flies to be homozygous. If the parent flies were homozygous, both the F1 and the F2 phenotypes would be the same holding a 1:1ratio, instead of the 9:3:3:1 ratio that was observed. The purpose of this experiment was to determine the F1 genotype of fruit fly traits using the phenotypic ratio of the F2 generation and to express these results of the unknown cross through a Chi-square model. After taking data with the Chi-squared value of 5.64, the degrees of freedom were 3 and the p-value was between .05 and .2, it is confident to fail to reject the null hypothesis, which leads the experimenters to believe that the observed phenotypic ratio does significantly deviate from that expected under the assumption of Mendelian inheritance. In the future, exploring more complex animals other than fruit flies, such as mammals or reptiles, would make this experiment a little more difficult, but more interesting as well. Without Mendelian genetics, it would be much more difficult to predict traits in organisms across the living…

    • 1348 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    butanol

    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages

    5. The 3 test tubes were set up again, as followed in step 2, but instead 4 drops were added to each test tube.…

    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The basic principle of Mendelian inheritance was studied using the fruit fly, Drosophila Melanogaster. A Cinnabar Brown female was crossed with Wild Type male. The flies were mated in a jar containing a nutrient medium and then placed in an incubator. The experiment was conducted over a period of 5 weeks. Cinnabar (cn) and brown (bw) are two loci in Drosophila with recessive eye colour mutations. Mutations in cn cause a bright red eye and mutations in bw cause a brown eye. Double mutants have white eyes. As predicted, all the F1 generation of flies were wild type. The F1 generation flies were crossed, and their progeny (F2 generation) produced 4 different types of phenotypes (wild type, cinnabar, brown and white) in the phenotypic…

    • 1733 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics