Preview

gun control

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
534 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
gun control
All guns have the potential to be dangerous and should be dealt with precaution. Guns have been a part of American history for as long as people can remember. For most individuals guns are supposed to be very dangerous and unsafe. Though, that is not true. Guns can be hazardous, but only if they are in the wrong hands. Owning a gun is a right that every American should take pride in having. Guns are used for self-protection, hunting, law enforcement and other practices. The right to own a gun is secured by the 2nd constitutional amendment. So, prohibition of guns from being owned or bought is immoral and unconstitutional. Gun control in the United States should be eliminated.
To get a gun, one would have to go through an exam to get a license to own and use a gun, and you wouldn’t be able to get one if you have any criminal record and you would also need to be a responsible adult. And, if the government bans guns, only criminals will have access to them since they already get them from drug dealers. Therefore, when confronted by a criminal, civilians would have no way to defend themselves.Argumentative Essay against Gun Control
Since 1980, forty-four states have passed laws allowing gun owners to carry concealed weapons outside their homes for personal protection. (Five additional states had these laws before 1980. Illinois is the sole holdout.) A federal ban on the possession, transfer, or manufacture of semiautomatic assault weapons, passed in 1994, was allowed to expire in 2004.

In 2005, Florida passed the Stand Your Ground law, an extension of the so-called castle doctrine, exonerating from prosecution citizens who use deadly force when confronted by an assailant, even if they could have retreated safely; Stand Your Ground laws expand that protection outside the home to any place that an individual “has a right to be.” Twenty-four states have passed similar laws. Guns, therefore, are necessary in today's society for our protection

There is no point to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In the first few chapters of A Canticle for Leibowitz, the post-apocalyptic world is portrayed as very empty and barren. Most post-apocalyptic setting portrayed in other books, such as The Road or The Hunger Games are filled with destruction, rubble, and destroyed buildings. However, the setting for Canticle is not with filled with such destruction, but rather, emptiness and solitude. The setting in the first few chapters, although it is revealed that Francis was wandering in a desert, seems to have been stripped of all forms of life except bloodthirsty wolves and rabid animals. There are no structures besides the ancient undiscovered temples and ruins, and there seems to be no people around either. The only things around are rocks and “a shimmering…

    • 245 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many Americans believe that Gun-Control Laws should be enforced, because “Individuals do not need guns for protection; it is the role of local and federal government to protect the people through law enforcement agencies and the military.” (http://www.StudentNewsDaily.com) All Individuals deserve the right to carry a gun with them at all times, to use for protection. According to the Second Amendment in the Constitution, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” (https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/second_amendment) Obtaining a gun, gives one the sense of feeling safe and protected given any situation. No one knows when they may be “attacked” or in danger, and the protection they need from the government may not always be there to protect them. Every American must learn self-defense and use it when needed, they shouldn’t have to rely and anyone but themselves.…

    • 232 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The main idea of stricter gun control is to deter crime rates, but doing this could potentially increase crime rates instead. Not allowing law abiding citizens to own guns will leave them defenseless to criminals that still have access to illegal guns. If criminals know that citizens no longer have guns to protect themselves, they are more likely to attempt that crime on them thus increasing crime rates. According to the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC), “Global Study on Homicide,”…

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Only Washington, D.C. prevents concealed carry except for both active and retired law enforcement officers. This article explores both sides of the concealed carry debate. For example, between May 2007 and March 2010 statistics reveal that nine law enforcement officers and 142 non-law enforcement individuals were killed by concealed carry handgun permit holders across the nation. It is also statistically significant to note that the majority of those who legally carry concealed do not abuse their rights and are non-violent. While it may seem obvious that criminals are less likely to attack someone that they believe might be armed, it is also important to emphasize that handguns are not an effective form of self-defense often resulting in injury and death for the individual carrying. A concealed handgun significantly increases the chances of a confrontation escalating in violence to a lethal degree. The risk of suicide is magnified as a vast majority of all suicide attempts are done in times impulsiveness where not only owning, but carrying a handgun gives an individual a method to act. There are those proponents of concealed carry who will tout the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution as a proof that citizens, who are to bear arms for a well-regulated militia, should be entitled to personal carry. Those on the anti concealed…

    • 2500 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    Because of the establishment of concealed carry legislation by all states over the years, it has been increasingly possible for almost every American citizen to carry concealed weapons in public places. As unfortunate and horrifying gun violence tragedies like the Newtown School Shooting and Sandy Hook school shooting repeatedly occur, whether citizens should have the right to carry a conceal handgun in public has created a massive uproar. People have different views about this issue. Just as the Second Amendment states that every human being has the constitutional right to keep and bear arms, many gun-rights advocates believe that reasonable citizens have the right to…

    • 1750 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Guns do a lot of bad, but do a lot more good for society. Banning guns will not stop the problem, but will just make it worse. Guns are apart of our society as Americans they have been around since colonial years, and are not leaving anytime soon. “The number of guns in America has increased by more than 50 percent since 1993, and in that same period the gun homicide rate in the United States has dropped by half. (Kristof, The Times).” Guns offer protection for individuals. One day you could be in the wrong place at the wrong time, and a shooting breaks out, you will pray there is someone else there with a concealed firearm to help control the situation while waiting for police to arrive. They can’t do that if guns are banned. “We need to understand that we cannot stop crimes and murders. And banning guns would be a step, or two, backwards instead of moving forward in the right direction (The Times News).” The research conducted to produce this paper was drawn from a multitude of sources all with different…

    • 1133 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gun Control Paper

    • 1134 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Reading a few articles on gun control I have found that studies have shown that criminals that know who owns guns have stopped them from committing there crimes. This brings up the right to carry concealed weapons to protect…

    • 1134 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Opposing Gun Control Laws

    • 1904 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Watch out! Murder and mayhem is surely on the horizon as gun control laws are being dropped, and penalties could be imposed on those who do not comply. The debate over the use of guns in the United States can be traced back as far as 1791. The United States has the greatest percentage of private firearm ownership in the world. Most people do not just own one gun they own two or more guns. The average citizen comes to the realization that in order to deter and defend themselves and their loved ones against crimes, the burden becomes theirs. The police cannot protect every individual from a crime. The book “Dial 911 and Die”, through different stories, proves that citizens need to rely upon themselves for their own personal protection. Even though each state has its own individual gun control laws, there is no nationwide system of gun control. Criminals can very easily have someone buy a gun for them in a state with slack gun laws and then have it brought back to a state with stricter gun laws. With that being said, a gun that is locked in a gun cabinet, disabled, or even just unloaded is less readily available as one that is left loaded and ready to use. People should not have limited access to their guns in our society because it’s a person’s right to bear arms; in addition, opposing gun control laws does not lessen crime rates and it is counterproductive in saving lives.…

    • 1904 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Gun Control

    • 1842 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Controlling access to firearms will not make shootings happen less frequently. While the media prefers to report and sensationalize the shootings committed by 'loners who kept to themselves until they finally snapped ', the average gun violence incident happens among the already present criminal element. Therefore, taking firearms out of the hands of law-abiding citizens will not only do nothing about criminal access to such weapons, but will rob otherwise honest and forthright citizens from being able to defend themselves from such villainy with equal measure. Gun control is vital, but not to the point of over control. Having the rights to our 2nd amendment is vital and increasing control won’t stop violence and taking away those rights will cause more violence. We as humans are prone to violence and predation (without the eating part) on one another simply because of our brain size and how we evolved.…

    • 1842 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    No matter how many laws you make, or even if they ban guns, they will always be and issue that we can’t escape from. Guns have been part of the American culture for to long to just take them away. Many different turning points for the worse in gun related violence could be stopped by concealed carry. Gang violence would lessen with just more restrictions on who can own a firearm and possess one, that is simply just our government paying more money into stopping the weapons from getting into the wrong hands. I also covered why semi automatic weapons are a good thing and aren’t just for the worst cases, a person with the intent to kill will still kill, regardless of the rounds he is able to fire in a certain amount of time. The point of this whole essay is to get through to people that criminals don’t listen to laws, but law-abiding citizens do. My hope is that this essay changed you point of view for the better, and that you now understand that guns are not such a bad thing after all. Like Justin Moore says in his song “Guns”, as long as I’m alive, they won’t take my…

    • 1204 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    law. This simply isn't true, but many people believe that's what gun control is. The weapons that are targeted by law makers are over-the-top dangerous and weapons that can be easily hidden by most people's standards. The official term for this is "semi-auto assault guns". In addition, magazines with considerably large ammo counts were banned. To understand the banning of these types of firearms, you must first understand the background. This ban on these types of guns start in 1989 when 34 children and a teacher were shot in Stockton using an AK-47 assault rifle. Later in 1993 the "California Street Shooting" also contributed to the ban. The shooter used a TEC-9 to shoot 6 people. The TEC-9 is fairly small and easy to hide, while considerably dangerous at the same time. In 1993, former presidents Gerald Ford, Jimmy Carter, and Ronald Reagan proposed to the U.S. House of Representatives to support this ban, and as evidence they used a CNN poll. The poll discovered 77% of Americans also supported the ban on these weapons. Considering that big percentage, it's clear most Americans agreed with the ban at the time. Now 'assault weapons' are thrown into three categories: rifles, pistols, shotguns. On top of the requirements from before, if a gun has two or more of these attachments, it is banned. This is to prevent over the top weapons. For rifles to be banned, it must have two or more of…

    • 1477 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Gun Control

    • 1381 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Gun Control is one of the most controversial issues in the world today. Although gun control has always been a sensitive topic, the recent uprisings in gun related crimes have made it a nearly impossible issue for citizens to agree on. Over the past decade, crimes involving the use of firearms have been very erratic. Only recently have the crimes become more severe and consistent. Guns instill fear in people everywhere because of how powerful they can truly be. Whether a gun is used to take down a criminal on the loose, or to kill an ex-boyfriend, they can cause great harm to many with just the pull of a trigger. Safety, self-defense, and fear are the main reasons that gun control is still being disputed today.…

    • 1381 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gun Control

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Some people are for new gun control laws, but I am one of the many that are against them. Now, it is impossible to pick up a newspaper or watch the evening news without being bombarded with the details of another mass shooting, or another child that was killed while playing with a gun. Unfortunately, there are many people who take the easy way out when it comes to a solution to this problem, they choose gun control. There are many facts that support my position in which I will explain.…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Firstly, people with violent and harmful intentions have easy access to guns. For example, in San Bernardino, California, one of the reasons why people were killed is because a terrorist received a gun with no hassle. Moreover, in 2012, Chief Maloney of the Greenland Police was shot and killed by a mentally unstable man. The man had received a gun through easy terms and proceeded to sell drugs at his house. Once the police came, he shot the Chief, his girlfriend, and then himself. This event could’ve been prevented through stricter gun laws. With harsher gun laws in place, there would be less hunting and less surprise attacks on small, innocent neighborhoods. Additionally, mentally ill people could receive guns easily. Obviously it isn’t a good idea to let mentally unstable people have guns, so this could result with unfortunate outcomes. If an adult with children has a gun, no matter how safe you think the location of it is, the child could gain access to the gun. This is an extreme hazard and must be controlled in a more civilized manner. With this said, we need to have stricter gun laws so guns are more difficult to…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics