There are some similarities of the two incerpts, Sir Gawain and the Green Knight and The Holy Grail. I believe that both come to be Romances. In the first story Sir Gawain was sent on a dangerous quest that of which was to seek the Green Chapel of the Green Knight to hold true to his oath that he would receive what he done to him one year and one day later. He was tested of his honor and courage when he gave his word to the lord Bercilak to give him all he won in the castle at the end of the day and also he proved true to that by not having an affair with his wife. By that test it determined whether or not he got his head chopped off. In the end Sir Gawain returned home. The Holy Grail was a story on the line of being a romance, but by the way I interpreted the story I found it to be one. In that story Sir Galahad had a dangerous quest of riding to the King Mordrayns, then by reburying a person who had lain burning for a long time, and then by going to Corbenic to the Castle of the Maimed King, Pellam. His test of honor or courage was of his loyalty to Jesu when he did what He wanted and said he's even die for him. He never returned home physically, but I believe he returned to his home in heaven when he died making The Holy Grail to be a romance in that instance.…
There are some characters in literature that begin like a seed, small and simple in certain context, but they grow with insight and understanding into a completely new being. Often times, this development of the protagonist is seen as the most crucial element in the progression of the text. This growth is the central purpose of the character and the novel. In Toni Morrison’s Song of Solomon, protagonist Milkman Dead embarks on a journey to discover truths of his family’s origin. Most importantly, the journey becomes two-fold, making a profound impact to prompt the growth and development of Milkman’s character as a whole. Various events associated with the Shalimar journey serve as turning points for Milkman, breaking his dependence on his father, establishing new relationships through newfound selflessness, and drawing out his passion and drive for life.…
The myth is situated in the 6th century, in Sub-Roman Britain, when the romans left the territory and the Saxons invade Great Britain. There is no historical data to contrast whether King Arthur existed or not, but the legend says he existed in the advanced Middle Ages but that is impossible because if he did existed it would have to have been a lot earlier. It was the authors of the medieval age, minstrels and troubadours that founded the myth attractive and transferred it to their time. Due to the decline that England suffered following the abandonment of Roman Empire and the entry of the Saxon orders, any historical data that allows us to think that King Arthur existed disappeared, but what happens is that the authors of the Middle Age idealized the character.…
After reading A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur’s Court by Mark Twain, I realized that you can’t always continuously read a book for more than two hours. The book started with the prologue or as Mark Twain called it, “A Word of Explanation” starting on page 11. This section, as it should, introduces the main character and how they, or in this book’s case, he got into the situation he is in currently. Until chapter two, did the book finally grab my attention. It goes on to explain that this main character named Hank Morgan, who lived in the 19th century, thinks that he is in an insane asylum, only to find out that he had somehow gone back in time, to the 6th century, after being hit over the head with a crowbar. With a turn of events, Hank was able to convince King Arthur that he was indeed a wizard. The book goes on to explain how this time traveler was able to turn this seemingly land rid of commonsense to one closely related to our modern world. However, the book didn’t catch my interest all the time causing me to reread pages upon pages until I finally understood what I was reading, but did manage to capture my attention at some points, though very few and…
King Arthur is a fictional character based off of an actual king in the fifth century. The tales were originally coined by the author Nennius, although, as years progressed it was discovered to be the craftsmanship of several authors. The several different writers each contributed to many different versions of the same story, much of the key elements remain the same. King Arthur was a Christian figurehead. He was the epitome of grace, modesty, and faith; just a few virtues that are heavily endeared by the Christian faith. In Le Morte d’Arthur, written by Sir Thomas Malory,Arthur says, “I may not so, for I have promised to do the battle to the uttermost by the faith of my body, while me lasteth the life, and therefore I had liefer to die with honour than to live with…
The legend of King Arthur can be traced as far back as the fourth and fifth centuries. But the earliest tales of Arthur were almost nothing like they are today. There were no wandering minstrels, or ladies–in–waiting, or knights in shining armor taking on bold quests to defend their ladies. Instead, there were tales of giants, and magic cups, and invaders from a foreign land. In some ancient versions of the legend, Arthur is a hero whose deeds are comparable to those of Hercules. In more modern versions, he is merely a king whose knights are the real heroes of the story. The earliest tales of Arthur were spread largely by word of mouth, and very few written accounts survive. Of the ones that do, we do not have the original documents, only copies…
Answers must be written on a separate sheet of loose leaf paper to receive credit.…
King Henry VIII was a very complicated man. He led a life of greatness in many different aspects. He loved to live an elaborate life, sometimes to the extent that he couldn’t afford. Starting from a young boy he excelled in athletics and thoroughly enjoyed them; horseback riding, archery, and jousting. Henry or, as he was sometimes called, Harry also had many influential people in his life throughout his rule in England. Some of the key players were Anne Boleyn and Thomas Cromwell. Both of these people used manipulation of Henry to further their own agendas.…
Many stories start off with a hero. Though there are many types of heroes in the world, the ones that stuck out the most would be epic heroes and the tragic heros. Epic heroes face many obstacles and they reach a low point, they quickly pick themselves up. In the end they usually return home from the journey they have been on and they end happy. Tragic heroes go on an emotional quest to find out more about themselves. They usually learn something about themselves during the journey, but ends up unhappy. In many books and stories that people read, the people in the stories are always facing something new and they become challenged from the evil people…
Warfare did not get invented during the Renaissance, but there were some significant innovations. Feudal cavalry lost its strength of the battlefield, infantry gained in stature, states learned how to field large armies for long periods of time. Most important of all, however, was the use of gunpowder.…
After 500 A.D., the story Beowulf was written by an unknown author. It was a long and adventurous epic poem written about a hero named Beowulf. Beowulf was considered an epic hero and it can be seen through many his characteristics shown in the story.…
Arthur Pendragon more famously known as King Arthur is a legendary leader who lived during the medieval era. There are various versions of the story of the knights of the round table and of how King Arthur came to be. Arthur is considered a heroic figure in most modern text, in many ways Arthur is a hero but in reality he is a tragic hero with flaws. Noble Stature is an important element of being a tragic hero, one must be remembered in order to be considered a hero, a tragic hero is not complete without a tragic flaw, most importantly a tragic hero must be excessively punished in order to learn an important lesson.…
Were Queen Elizabeth I and Catherine the Great effective rulers? Were their reign's characterized as good or not so well? Disregarding the opinion of those who reigned concurrently or historians today, these two ruled their country in a time of turmoil and uncertainty! The world and the people within it were undergoing a major transition. New lands were being discovered as well as major role-playing continents and countries were changing status. Some losing power while others gained it. Queen Elizabeth I and Catherine the Great ruled their country to the extent in which they were able and their subjects allowed them to. Queen Elizabeth I of England was a remarkable ruler. Elizabeth was born in 1533 to Henry VIII of England and took the throne in 1588 at the age of twenty-five and reigned until 1603 when she passed away (Sowards, 28). Elizabeth was the last of the Tudor Dynasty (Upshur, 465). Due to her father's uncontrollable hap-hazardous rule, Elizabeth, at only the age of twenty-five, was already faced with dilemma within England. Henry VIII wanted a male to take over his throne so when he felt his time was running out, Henry VIII needed to divorce his Queen at that time but the Catholic Church doesn't allow this. He separated from the church and brought England with him. He turned England into a protestant nation. Needless to say people were confused and had to make huge adjustments. At the beginning of Elizabeth's reign there was confusion. She was a firm Catholic however she made a compromise between the two religions. Queen Elizabeth's decision was due largely from the consent of her people (Upshur, 465). However, Elizabeth knew that two religions would cause problems. "As reestablished, the Anglican Church was protestant in it's Theology, but much of it's ritual and ecclesiastical organization remained Catholic in form"(Upshur, 465). Elizabeth believed that loyalty of her people would bring them together as well as the country. The people were not forced by…
"Richard III" is a historical play script written by a well known play writer/poet William Shakespeare and cover's interlocking themes such as Power, Justice, Betrayal, Manipulation, Compassion and forgiveness. In this essay I will be focusing in detail on what language techniques Richard uses to get what he wants. The main and most effective technique that Richard uses to get what he wants is by manipulating his language to have different interpretations. Also I will compare the similarities and differences on how his persuasive language and decisive action’s affect women especially in extracts act 1, scene 2 and act 4, scene 4. These will be my main points of which I will cover throughout this essay and then I will conclude my findings.…
The name “tragic hero”, which has become synonymous with Shakespearean dramas, was developed before Hamlet, Macbeth or any of Shakespeare’s well-known plays were written. The literary term was actually discovered around 330 BC by the ancient Greek philosopher Aristotle. Through his theory of catharsis, Aristotle debated that the great plays of Sophicles, Euripides, and other Greek playwrights contained tragic heroes similar to each other, which all portrayed four basic characteristics (“English Lit.”). These qualities were a tragic flaw, or harmartia, they all were from a noble class, with very human personalities, and they all face their tragedy with dignity. It is not until the late 1500s that Shakespeare began to utilize Aristotle’s observations in the production of his many tragedies (Desjardens).…