Preview

Law Corporate Manslaughter

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
702 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Law Corporate Manslaughter
Fact Sheet
Actus Reus
The Actus Reus of criminal law includes all elements of a crime except the state of mind of the defendant. Specifically, Actus Reus may consist of: conduct, result, a state of affairs, or an omission.
Conduct
The conduct itself could be criminal. For instance the act of lying under oath represents the Actus Reus of perjury. It does not matter if the lie is believed or if it had any effect on the outcome of the case, The Actus Reus of the crime is complete upon conduct.
Example of conduct crime:
Perjury
Theft
Making off without payment
Rape
Possession of drugs or a firearm
Result
The Actus Reus may relate to the result of the act or omission of the defendant.
The Act itself may not be criminal, but the result of the act may be. For instance it is not a crime to throw a stone, but if it hits a person or smashes a window it could amount to a crime. Causation must be established in all result crimes.
Examples of result crimes: Assault
Battery
ABH
Wounding and GBH
Murder & Manslaughter
Criminal damage
State of affairs
For state of affairs crimes the Actus Reus consists of 'being' rather than 'doing'. For example 'being' drunk in charge of a vehicle (Duck v peacock [1949] 1 All ER 318 Case summary) or 'being' an illegal alien (R v Larsonneur 1933) 24 Cr App R74 case summary). (Reference-Law resources online)
Omission
Occasionally an omission can result to the Actus Reus of a crime. The general rule concerning omissions is that there is no obligation for a failure to act. For instance if you see a child drowning in shallow water and you don't do anything to save that child you will not acquire criminal liability for your passivity no matter how easy it may have been for you to save the child's life. This general rule however, is subject to exceptions:
1. Statutory duty: In some situations there is a statutory duty to act, for example to provide details of insurance after a traffic accident or to notify DVLA when

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Omission – An Omission is where the Actus Reus is in the form of not doing something, another term is negligence.…

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cross 9e TBB Ch07

    • 2373 Words
    • 13 Pages

    One element that normally must exist for a person to be convicted of a crime is the performance of a prohibited act.…

    • 2373 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Regina Knight Case

    • 1974 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Actus reus is the term referring to ‘guilty act’ meaning any voluntary actions of omissions that constitutes to a crime, it is the physical element of an offence Her Actus reus is shown through her act of stabbing him 37 times and killing him. She also chopped off his head and cooked it with vegetables and skinned majority of his body. It is certain to say her act was intentional, malicious and evil.…

    • 1974 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    HSC Legal Studies

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Actus reus: refers to the actions (or in rare cases the failure to act/the omission) of the accused; that is that the accused actually did the act…

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    a. Mere intentions do not make a criminal offence – there must be a criminal act or omission…

    • 991 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    (as shown in the book) Figure 2–1 illustrates the relationship between mens rea and actus reus. Criminality exists when the two concur and where no defense, as characterized in the figure, exists. Defenses in this figure refer to the zone of individual liberties over which governments have no authority to regulate and to those instances where other factual or legal defenses free an individual from criminal responsibility. Hence, as discussed in this chapter, the essence of criminal conduct consists of a concurrence of a criminal act with a culpable mental state.” In the case of the shooting of Mayor Crespo, wife Lyvette ‘actus reus’ or the criminal act is the shooting of her husband. ‘Mens rea’ is the wife’s culpable (or responsible) mental state during the incident. A concurrence of the two – actus reus and mens rea is clearly observed in the shooting, and this clearly constitutes as crime. Whatever outcome this may have in the coming days or weeks, I will be one of many spectators who wait for the full story and final decision. One thing is clear; a crime was obviously committed at the night of the…

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    An omission can amount to the Actus Reus of a crime, however, the general rule regarding omissions is that there is no liability for a failure to act. For example if you see a person drowning you have no obligation to help them. This could be seen as a gap in the law therefore it could said that this is a reason that English Criminal law should impose a duty on general citizens to assist a person in peril. Although this is the general rule there are exceptions. The first exception is when there is a statutory duty to act for example stopping at a red light under the Road Traffic Act 1988. Another example is where there is a contractual duty to act. This where it states in a defendants employment contract that they must act. A case example would be in R v Pitwood where the defendant failed to lower the level crossing barrier which resulted in the victim dying. The defendant was found guilty of manslaughter as he had breached his contractual duty. Finally the third exception is when the duty is imposed by law. There are three situations in which this may happen; failing to rectify a dangerous situation as in R v Miller, when there has been a voluntary acceptance of a duty as in Dobinson v Stone and finally misconduct in a public office as in R v…

    • 1327 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    HSC PREP

    • 5612 Words
    • 23 Pages

    Actus Reus: A Latin term, which means the guilty act. Actus Reus means that there must be an action or physical movement.…

    • 5612 Words
    • 23 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In most cases, criminal liability does not depend on the commission or omission of an…

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Criminal law often prohibits specific acts. Therefore, the evidence must be reasonably demonstrate actions caused by the suspects. This particular action is called guilty act - Latin: actus reus. Prohibited acts can constituted by an act or an act of intimidation, or in some extreme cases, the non-action as well. For example, parent starved newborn is also a forbidden act. If the offense is a no action as mentioned above, it should be accompanied by a duty. This duty may be due to contracts, voluntary commitment, relationships and sometimes blood vessels due to their assigned positions. Responsibilities also can form if you manually create a dangerous condition. An offense can be defended if the prosecutors could not prove causal link of the offense of the offender for damages caused.…

    • 257 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Prosecuting Arguments

    • 1690 Words
    • 7 Pages

    For the charge of homicide, all of the required elements are present in the facts of the case. The journal entries discussing the purchase of rope, rags, and a sharp hunting knife "to fulfill [his] destiny" prove mens rea. Actus reus is proven in the evidence that the victim was found with cloth stuffed in her mouth, arms and legs tied with rope restraints, and…

    • 1690 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Fagan V Met Police

    • 3954 Words
    • 16 Pages

    … It is argued that … there was no act on the part of the appellant which could constitute an actus reus, but only the omission or failure to remove the wheel as soon as he was asked. That failure, it is said, could not in law be an assault, nor could it in law provide the necessary mens rea to convert the original act of mounting the foot into an assault. Counsel for the respondent argues that the first mounting of the foot was an actus reus, which act continued until the moment of time at which the wheel was removed. During that continuing act, it is said, the appellant formed the necessary intention to constitute the element of mens rea and, once that element was added to the continuing act, an assault took place ……

    • 3954 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Right to Confront

    • 2014 Words
    • 9 Pages

    ACT: An Impermissible Abridgement of Criminal Defendants ' Rights." Boston College. Web. 29 Nov. 2010. .…

    • 2014 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    criminal justice

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages

    An individual may be guilty of a crime by failing to act only if that individual has a legal duty to act.…

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    SUMMARY OF THE CONFLICT THEORY KARL MARX’S VIEW ON CRIME WHAT IS CRIME ?  An action or omission that constitutes an offense that may be prosecuted by the state and is punishable by law.…

    • 512 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics