Preview

Napoleon and Italian Unification Essay Example

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
737 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Napoleon and Italian Unification Essay Example
To what extent was Napoleon III responsible for the unification of Italy?

Napoleon III's contribution to the unification of Italy was decisive but inadvertent. He and Cavour had no intention of unifying Italy; Cavour was interested in Piedmontese augmentation, while Napoleon was concerned to put French interests and his family before anything else. He had several reasons to help Cavour, none of which included his desire for a unified Italy. To a great extent, he was responsible for Italian unification. Count Cavour, the prime minister of Piedmont, carried out economic and industrial developments to try to rebuild Piedmont after the 1848-9 revolutions. He realized he could not expel Austria from Italy without foreign aid. He aimed to obtain such support from the likes of England and France. The British government was not willing to assist him, and he turned to Napoleon III. Cavour set out to win French support by launching extensive social reforms throughout Sardinia and by joining France in the Crimean War. Afterwards, Cavour met with Napoleon III to plan the liberation of Italy and to make sure he had military support. Cavour endeavored to win military support because he was preparing for a war with Austria. An agreement was made between France and Sardinia. Napoleon III saw this as an opportunity to strengthen Sardinia because it would be a troublesome neighbor for Austria. Piedmont was to pay for all French expenses, and Napoleon requested a marriage association between his family and that of the House of Savoy. It was also an opportunity to gain control of more land, as he was promised Nice and Savoy in return for his assistance. After a period of fighting, Napoleon had offered an armistice to Austria and peace would follow. Austria agreed to yield Lombardy to Piedmont. The treaty provided that the people of the Duchies of Tuscany, Parma, and Modena should return to their allegiance, but this was not possible without military force. The people were

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Ap Euro Study Guide

    • 1541 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Austria was provoked into invading Piedmont, France largely responsible for early victories, then Napoleon III declared peace with Austria abruptly in 1858 without telling Cavour. Why? Longer and costlier war than he anticipated, Prussian moving in.. Piedmont only got Lombardy, not Venetia.…

    • 1541 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fearing that they would lose power, many European countries worked together to crush the French Revolution to lower the possibility of uprisings in their own countries. Austria and Prussia were highly alarmed with the dethroning of the French monarchy, prompting them to urge the French to restore Louis XVI to power. As a result, the Legislative Assembly declared war on the allies. During Napoleon’s rule, Britain, Russia, Austria, and Sweden feared his ambitions to conquer all of Europe and allied against France.…

    • 569 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    i. The coalition offered final terms to the emperor: he could retain his throne, but France would be reduced to her normal frontiers.…

    • 3896 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In 1796, a French leader named Napoleon Bonaparte lead his army to attack Italy. Napoleon was an innovator and an opportunist. Although Napoleon had his own reasons for taking over Northern Italy, France mainly wanted Italy for financial and strategic reasons. At this time, Austria owned a portion of Italy, but France wanted to keep this land from them because “it was an ideal outpost for defense and offense” (Sarti 19). Only a few months into Napoleon’s rule, he had changed the political landscape of Italy which had been in place for years. After the Jacobins took power in Genoa in the north and the Roman Republic replaced papal rule in Rome, the Parthenopean Republic replaced the royal court, who escaped to…

    • 123 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Susan Muthan1

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In consort with the supporters, there were some anti-unification leaders. The Peace of Villafranca, treaty between France and Austria (1859) stated that conjoining the territories would be easy, but Emperor Napoleon III of France wrote that he did not want Italy to unify because the nation would diminish its preponderance. Though to many it seemed and obvious choice for unification, to these writer including Giuseppe Garibaldi, believed they were a monarchy in the first place for a reason. They thought that separate kingdoms and territories would be beneficial for everyone.…

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Contradicting opinions from his two closest advisors bombarded Napoleon. François de Barbé-Marbois – the impeccably honest finance minister – pushed toward a sale to raise money for a war with England. Charles-Maurice de Talleyrand-Périgord – Napoleon’s witty and corrupt chief advisor – pushed him to hold on to the colony, a position he believed held long-term benefits for France, if not for…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The north of Italy was largely controlled by Austria, and their military prowess allowed them to greatly dominate the north and quickly stop any revolts…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A system of alliances between the ‘Great Powers’ of Europe had survived the wars of the Spanish and Austrian succession in the first half of the eighteenth century, but the French-Indian War forced a change. In the old system Britain was allied with Austria, who was allied with Russia, while France was allied with Prussia. However, Austria was chaffing at this alliance after the Treaty of Aix-la-Chapelle had ended the War of the Austrian Succession in 1748, because Austria had wanted to recover the rich region of Silesia, which Prussia retained. Austria therefore began, slowly, tentatively, talking with France.…

    • 912 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While France and England hoped to expand their empires. Everyone had a part in this,…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Foreign support was vital to the Jacobites in both the rebellions of 1715 and 1745-46. Many British Jacobites based their participation in the rebellions on the arrival of foreign assistance. The French support for the rebellion of 1715 was hampered by the death of Louis XIV in 1714. The Duke of Orleans succeeded Louis XIV and with the 1713 Treaty of Utrecht still standing and his own designs on becoming heir-apparent the Duke needed peace and an understanding with Britain.1 France, in both the ‘15 and the ‘45 was always faced with more demands on its strengths than it could possibly meet. Only if the French strategists could see the exiled house of Stuart as a priority would support be forthcoming. James ordered his followers and sympathizers to do all they could to involve France and England, hoping for an intervention.2 The Spanish participated and aided the Jacobites during the latter stages of the 1715 rising. In late December a shipment of £15,000 of Spanish gold was despatched, but with luck not on the rebels side it was wrecked on the beach at St Andrews Bay.3 Similarly in the 1745-46 rising the French ship “Le Prince Charles” carrying funds was intercepted by the Royal Navy forcing Charles Edward into an early and fateful battle in April 1746.4 The lack of financial aid sounded the death knell to both rebellions. In the ‘45 it is thought that Louis XV had left his decision to commit himself to the cause far too late, holding back to find out how serious the rebellion in Scotland was.5 This unfortunate lack of foreign assistance was a key factor in the failure of the rebellions.…

    • 1427 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Italian people were living in the control of foreign rulers. The ideal Italian leaders were Giuseppe Mazzini, Cavour, and Giuseppe Garibaldi. Mazzini centralized the republic and gave more emphasis on the right and the will of the people. Next, Gioberti headed the federation of existing states, and then Italian nations were built around the aristocratic kingdom of Sardinia-Piedmont as german looked towards Prussia. Cavour has played a prominent role in the Sardinina government from the period 1850 to 1861. He was recognized as a dominant figure during that time. In 1852, Cavour was elected as a chief minister in the Sardinian monarchy. Likewise Cavour made the necessary arrangements and took actions wisely in order to integrate northern and central Italy. Also, Cavour acquainted several programs of railroads, highways, civil liberties and provided assistance for Sardinia. Moreover, with the help of France, he achieved victory over Austria and Lombardy. Thereafter Garbaldi removed the Sicily kingdom and then finally in 1860, southern Italy and Sicily was given to…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    2. Maria Theresa made an alliance with the French kings after realizing that they were not Austria's biggest threat anymore. During Maria Theresa's reign, her main issues had been with Prussia.…

    • 246 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Napoleon Research Paper

    • 1641 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The transition of the urban development of Paris France towards the second empire- Napoleon lll…

    • 1641 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nationalism Dbq

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Nationalism was a key factor in building nations. Throughout the years Italians were growing impatient and dissatisfied under foreign rule. Count Cavour was responsible for the brains behind the unification of Italy. He believed that releasing the Italians from foreign rule would not only leave the country authoritative and superb but also supply the people with intelligence and knowledge (Doc. 3). Italian Nationalists looked up to the Kingdom of Piedmont-Sardinia because of their power over the Italian states. In 1848, the kingdom had adopted a liberal constitution. So to the middle class liberals, unification under Piedmont Sardinia was appealing. Giuseppe Garibaldi, the leader of army of nationalists, captured Sicily. After marching across the Italian mainland their was an agreement to let the Sardinian king rule. Like Italy, Germany achieved national unity around the same time. The Austrian Empire took over the German confederation; however, Prussia was prepared to unify them. Prussia had a mainly German empire. Therefore, nationalism truly unified Prussia. When Bismarck took control, he was a master of realpolitik. Bismarck’s method for uniting Germany was through blood and iron (Doc 5). He believed that the power of Germany should be allocated over all German People. In his eyes, war was the only option to achieving success.…

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Initially the Whites were in power, so they expelled the Blacks. In response, Pope Boniface VIII planned a military occupation of Florence. In 1303, Charles of Valois, who was the brother of King Philip IV of France, was to visit Florence because he was appointed peacemaker by the Pope. It was believed that Charles of Valois had received other unofficial instructions, so the council sent a delegation to Rome to ascertain the Pope's intentions. Dante was one of the delegates.…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays