Preview

O'Rourke V. City of Providence

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
423 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
O'Rourke V. City of Providence
Caleb Duncan 02/17/2011
JULIA M. O'ROURKE, Plaintiff, Appellee,
v.
CITY OF PROVIDENCE, Defendant, Appellant.
07-14-1997
Issue: Plaintiff was a fire fighter for the City of Providence from 1992 to June 30, 1995. Plaintiff filed a five count complaint asserting hostile work environment and R.I. Gen. Law 28-5-24.1 (Rhode Island Fair Employment Practices Act); and disparate treatment. She also alleged violation of her equal rights and sought damages pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983.
Facts:
Until 1990, no female firefighters had ever served in the City of Providence Fire Department. In January, 1992, O'Rourke and six other women who had passed a written examination were admitted to the City's firefighter six-month training program, along with 77 male trainees. All through the fire academy, as well as her first several years working as a fire fighter, O’Rourke was slandered and sexually harassed. On July 10, 1995, O'Rourke filed a discrimination charge with the Rhode Island Commission of Human Rights and with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and received notice of right to sue. O'Rourke also filed a federal court complaint against the City on June 30, 1995, and an amended complaint on July 17, 1995. O'Rourke introduced evidence of harassment spanning the entire duration of her employment at the fire department from 1992 to 1994 including her time spent in training in 1992, the period in which she worked in the Chief's office later that year, her year-long stay at Engine 5 in 1993, and finally, her seven months at Engine 13 in 1994.
Holding:
The court granted the motion as to the § 1983 counts against the City and individual defendants on the ground that there was no evidence that the City of Providence or the individual defendants had intentionally discriminated against O'Rourke. The court also dismissed O'Rourke's Title VII disparate impact claims as duplicative of her hostile work environment sexual harassment claim. The jury awarded O'Rourke

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    In the case of White v. Patrick Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern, Mrs. White is suing Mr. Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern in the death of her husband, Mr. White. Mr. Edward Hard was a patron of the tavern the night of the accident with Mr. and Mrs. White. Mr. Hard was in a relationship with Mrs. White before she married Mr. White. Mr. Hard saw Mr. and Mrs. White leave the tavern on this night and followed them out the door. Mrs. White observed Mr. Hard drinking several alcoholic beverages while they were there. When Mr. and Mrs. White where leaving Mr. Hard confronted Mr. White telling him that “she should be my wife” and “this is not over.” After Mr. and Mrs. White got in their car and were leaving the establishment, Mr. Hard followed them driving recklessly. He was swerving across the road, driving in the opposite lane, and hitting mailboxes. His recklessness and inability to drive due to being intoxicated resulted in him crashing into Mr. and Mrs. White’s vehicle ultimately killing Mr. White and severely injuring Mrs. White. This court case took place in United States District Court in the Northern District of Indiana. This is court case number 82A04-8876-CB285, White vs. Patrick Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern. The lawyers in this case are Benjamin Walton, Jordan Van Meter who represent the defendants Patrick Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern and Jackson Welch, Amanda Babot who represent the plaintiff Debbie White.…

    • 1382 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    On May 22, 1996, two days after the incident, the plaintiff, who was not scheduled to work that day, returned to the restaurant curious to determine whether there was any hostility toward him resulting from his having called the Department of Health. The plaintiff testified that he was summarily ordered by David Badot, the restaurant’s manager, to come into his office and that Badot proceeded to shout at him while inquiring whether he had contacted the Department of Health. The plaintiff testified that he shouted back at Badot and acknowledged that he had indeed called Department of Health. Badot then accused the plaintiff of stealing one of the defendant’s softball team shirts and of taking a work schedule home.…

    • 757 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    4)The case we read in class that I enjoyed the most was State of Connecticut v. Cardwell. I primarily liked it because it best exemplifies the difference and complexity regarding the sale of goods and the helps reflect the distinction between a “shipment” and “destination” contracts. I disagree with the trial courts judgment that Cardwell sold tickets within Connecticut and thereby violated Connecticut statute. However, I agree with the judgment of the court after the appeal. The transfer of goods occurred in Massachuestes, therefore the sale of the tickets, as defined by the code, occurred in Massachusts.…

    • 97 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The facts in the case of Thompson V North American Stainless, LP 562 U.S._ (2011) are fairly straightforward. The petitioner in this case, Eric Thompson, was seemingly fired from his job at North American Stainless (NAS) because his fiancée, Miriam Regalado filed a sexual discrimination charge with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). His suit was filed under Title VII claiming that his dismissal was retaliation for his fiancée’s charge. (Pagnattaro, Cahoy, Magid, Reed, & Shedd, n.d.)…

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This 2009 Supreme Court decision was a result of alleged racial discrimination with regard to internal promotions of nineteen New Haven, Connecticut firefighters. New Haven city officials invalidated test results when no Blacks scored high enough to meet the minimum score necessary to be eligible for promotion. Therefore, the White and Hispanic candidates that did pass with the necessary scores felt they had been discriminated against based on their race. The city decided not to certify the test results because of the disproportionate number of white candidates in comparison to minorities, and…

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Terry V. Ohio Case Study

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Martin McFadden was a police officer in Ohio who noticed that two individuals appeared to be acting suspiciously. While watching these people from his police car, Officer McFadden noticed that these two men appeared to be planning a criminal attack. The two men were walking back and forth in front of a store while conspiring with each other. When McFadden approached the two men and identified himself as a law enforcement officer, he walked them down the street and frisked them for weapons or illegal drugs. When searching the men, Officer McFadden found a handgun. The individuals were taken into police custody and charged with carrying a concealed weapon.…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Reeves vs Ch Robinson

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Holding(s): The grounds for a Title VII sexual harassment claim can be either a tangible employment action or the creation of a hostile work environment caused by sexual harassment that is severe or persuasive enough to affect the terms and conditions of work. In order to recover under the hostile work environment theory an employee must show (1) that she belongs to the protected group, (2) she has been subject to unwelcomed sexual harassment, (3)the harassment was based on membership in the protected group, (4) harassment was sufficiently severe or persuasive enough to alter the terms and conditions of employment and create an abusive work environment, and (5) basis for holding the employer liable exists The only element s at issue are the “based on” and “severe and pervasive” elements The issue of “based on” in order to be satisfied the plaintiff must show that similarly situated members of the opposite sex were…

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Civil Rights Act of 1964, Title VII, forbids “an employer to … discriminate against any individual with respect to his compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, because of such individual’s … sex.” Civil Rights Act, 1964. In Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson, the court held that “a plaintiff may establish a violation of Title VII by proving that discrimination based on sex has created a hostile or abusive work environment.” Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson (US 1986). A hostile work environment is created when the environment at work creates anxiety so severe as to result in an alteration of the terms and conditions of employment. Hailey Course Pack, p. 140. The burden to prove such an environment was created rests on the plaintiff. The plaintiff must prove that they belong to a protected class; were subject to unwelcomed harassment; the harassment is based on sex, meaning it is not happening to members of the opposite sex; and the harassment alters the conditions of employment. Hailey Course Pack, p. 140. In this case, the court will evaluate whether Black has sufficient evidence to prove her claim of a hostile work environment.…

    • 1852 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    On June 29, 2009, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a controversial five to four decision in Ricci v. DeStefano. The case of Ricci vs DeStefano raises the uncomfortable but common question of how far will employers go to favor one race over another? In other words, discrimination was at play in the case, in a scenario that will be unexpected to readers. The case of Frank Ricci vs. John DeStefano was established through an invalid act in the case of firefighters, promoting firefighters to be precise.…

    • 1069 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Vaughn Case Brief

    • 3486 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Plaintiff-Appellant Emma S. Vaughn contests the judgment rendered in favor of defendant Texaco, Inc., dismissing with prejudice Vaughn's race and sex discrimination suit filed pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 as amended, 42 U.S.C. Sec. 2000e et seq. Because the magistrate clearly erred in finding no racial discrimination, we reverse.…

    • 3486 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    “Your employee, whose claim was just dismissed as having no reasonable cause for discrimination, obtained a “Right to Sue” 12 letter from the EEOC, which enabled him to bring a private action against you in federal court”. The information that is provide is not enough information to prove that Carol was discriminated again. She will need to prove that there is a discrimination and she must first establish a prima facie. According to Bennett-Alexander & Hartman (2009), prima facie is “presenting evidence that fits each requirement of a cause of action.” However, the information that was provided is not showing that there has been a disparate treatment. And therefore it is not recognized under the Title VII of the civil Right Act. A worker who…

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The author recognizes that career boundaries have eroded and gendered barriers have softened. “Women wanted equal opportunity in employment,” the author said at the beginning of his “Preface”, which acquaints readers with a background history of women in the New York City Fire Department, where the author was formerly employed.…

    • 321 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Providence Debate

    • 2225 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Elwell, Walter. Evangelical Dictionary of Theology. Grand Rapid Michigan: BakerAcademic, 2001. (accessed July 8, 2013). P. 201.…

    • 2225 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    On November 29, 1947, the plaintiff entered on a written agreement, Exhibit A, with the defendant, the most important provisions of which are (1) that they shall organize a partnership for the bottling and distribution of Mision soft drinks, plaintiff to act as industrial partner or manager, and the defendant as a capitalist, furnishing the capital necessary therefor; (2) that the defendant was to decide matters of general policy regarding the business, while the plaintiff was to attend to the operation and development of the bottling plant; (3) that the plaintiff was to secure the Mission Soft Drinks franchise for and in behalf of the proposed partnership; and (4) that the plaintiff was to receive 30 per cent of the net profits of the business. The above agreement was arrived at after various conferences and consultations by and between them, with the assistance of their respective attorneys. Prior to entering into this agreement, plaintiff had informed the Mission Dry Corporation of Los Angeles, California, U.S.A., manufacturers of the bases and ingridients of the beverages bearing its name, that he had interested a prominent financier (defendant herein) in the business, who was willing to invest half a million dollars in the bottling and distribution of the said beverages, and requested, in order that he may close the deal with him, that the right to bottle and distribute be granted him for a limited time under the condition that it will finally be transferred to the corporation (Exhibit H). Pursuant for this request, plaintiff was given "a thirty-days" option on exclusive bottling and distribution rights for the Philippines" (Exhibit…

    • 9969 Words
    • 40 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The court reversed the intermediate court's judgment and reinstated the administrative law judge's decision that respondent was terminated for racial reasons. The intermediate court erred by rejecting the permissive inference of intentional discrimination as insufficient where the fact finder found the proffered reasons to be a pretext…

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays