Preview

Short Essay Example on Deductive Reasoning

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
551 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Short Essay Example on Deductive Reasoning
Short Essay on Deductive Reasoning

Deduction is taught through the study of formal logic. Logic (both inductive and deductive logic) is the science of good reasoning. It is called formal because its main concern is with creating forms that serve as models to demonstrate both correct and incorrect reasoning. The difference is that, unlike induction, where an inference is drawn from an accumulation of evidence, deduction is a process that reasons about relationships between classes, characteristics and individuals. Deductive arguments start with one or more premises and then reasons to consider what conclusions must necessarily follow from them.

In order to understand logic, it is crucial to grasp and analyze key terms that are linked with it and explain its basics. First of all, an argument appears both in inductive and deductive reasoning. Deductive arguments involve premises that lead to a conclusion, whereas inductive ones establish premises based on experience and general evidence. Reasoning is another term linked with logic, and it describes the process of drawing conclusions, judgments or inferences from facts or premises.
Logic arranges deductive arguments in standardized forms that make the structure of the argument clearly visible for study and review. These forms are called syllogisms.

Syllogisms are useful for testing the reliability of a deduction according to the rules of logic. A syllogism usually contains two premises and a conclusion. The first one is called major and the second is called minor. They are claims made in an argument that provide the reasons for believing in the conclusion. A syllogism present claims concerning a relationship between the terms given in the premises and those in the conclusion. Their purpose is to clarify the claims of the premises, to discover and expose any hidden premises and to find out if one thought follows logically from the previous one. In inductive thinking, if the premises are true, the conclusion is

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In this paper I will be discussing two arguments models; one is from a philosopher‘s view and the other is from a psychologist’s view. I will explain how and why these models are important. I will also discuss my understanding of the thinking and justification of each model of argument by compare and contrasting the two arguments.…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    PHI 201 Week 6 Quiz 1

    • 755 Words
    • 7 Pages

    When the premises are true and the syllogism is valid, we have a(n) _______ argument.…

    • 755 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to our text, Deductive reasoning takes all of the given essentials and uses them and nothing else to structure a conclusion. Deduction is a form of argument that purports to be conclusive. The theory is what concludes to the…

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Logical argument is a form of reasoning that attempts to establish the truth of one claim based on the assumed truth of the evidence in other claims provided to support a conclusion. It is different from a claim or a statement because it is more then one statement or idea therefor calling for more claims, or statements.…

    • 591 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    PHL 111 Critical Task 3

    • 1105 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Reconstruct a full argument, showing how the premises/assumptions lead to the conclusion or goal that one is intending to prove.…

    • 1105 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    PHI210 STUDENT GUIDE 1

    • 6304 Words
    • 31 Pages

    This course develops the ability to identify, analyze, and evaluate reasoning in everyday discourse. It examines the elements of good reasoning from both a formal and informal perspective and introduces some formal techniques of the basic concepts of deductive and inductive reasoning. It also promotes reasoning skills through examining arguments from literature, politics, business, and the media. This course enables students to identify common fallacies, to reflect on the use of language for the purpose of persuasion, and to think critically about the sources and biases of the vast quantity of information that confronts us in the “Information Age.”…

    • 6304 Words
    • 31 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Deductive and inductive reasoning is an interesting topic that is widely available on internet. Deductive arguments are arguments by the arguer to be valid and logical that is they have to provide justification, guarantee and proof for the derived conclusion. The premises that are presented by arguer should be strong and powerful enough to use it as a proof; it must guarantee conclusions. If a valid argument has true conclusions, then the argument is said to be sound whereas inductive arguments are disagreements by arguer to enhance the probability of conclusion. Probability can be strong and it can be weak based on the level of arguments.…

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    conclusions follow syllogistically from premises, in the same way that the conclusion “Bill Clinton is mortal" follows from the…

    • 692 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Reasoning is the activity of making inferences. This is when you attempt to justify or…

    • 5131 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    It consists of a group of statements with one or more statements (premises) supporting another statement (conclusion). In Critical Thinking, argument is an act of presenting reasons to support individual’s position or point of view. It is not quarrel or dispute. By "argument," we mean a demonstration or a proof of some statement, not emotional language. E.g., "That bird is a crow; therefore, it's black."…

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The structure of an argument reveals both the strengths and limits of the argument; nothing more, nothing less. An argument can only be as strong as it is meant to be. The writer’s goal is to make a close depiction of this argument without overstepping any boundaries. The Toulmin method is essentially a guide for analyzing the structures of arguments. Nevertheless, this method is more effective for arguments with no absolute truths or clear solutions. This lets the writer know how to use and understand the information. There are six elements for presenting arguments in the Toulmin method: claim, grounds, warrant, backing, qualifier, and rebuttal. These elements of a Toulmin analysis can help one as both a reader and a writer; however, there…

    • 586 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Psychology

    • 398 Words
    • 2 Pages

    3)Define the term "reasoning" and explain the two basic forms of reasoning, giving examples for each.…

    • 398 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Validity and Soundness

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Symbolic notation and truth tables are great tools to identify validity. In argument 1, the statement that Socrates has corrupted the youth can be abbreviated as ‘Y’. The statement that either his young followers will accuse him or their relatives will accuse him can be translated as – either ‘F’ or ‘R’. In the second argument, the statement that death is dreamless sleep can be abbreviated as ‘D’. The statement death is a migration of the soul to some other place can be abbreviated as ‘M’ and the statement that there is reason to fear death can be abbreviated as ‘F’. When one translates statements into symbolic notation, one must be concerned not to associate with the expressions of the English language; the letters or symbols should be in the purest form of its definition. Symbolic notation is a great time-saver in argumentation. It prevents logical confusion especially when dealing with complex arguments.…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    According to Toulmin in Renkema (2004: 203) contends that the most important in arguments is how the arguments are structured, not the form of logic. It has been explained earlier that argumentation occurs when different people have different viewpoints. Argumentation is a way to gain or alleviate others’ point of views in order to set the seal or…

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Deductive Argument

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Premise 1: People should be cognizant of his or her surroundings while shopping at local malls.…

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays