Smoking Should Be Banned in Public Places Essay Example
Smoking should be banned in public places?
As people becoming gradually more thoughtful with living longer and healthier lives, the harmful effects of habits and live styles have come under significant considerations. One of the issues which have been a controversial and mach debated subject within the lifestyle is the issue of smoking in the public places. The British Medical Health Association research has found that at least 1,000 people die in the UK every year as results of passive tobacco smoke. Other people tobacco smoke increases the chance of non-smokers contracting fatal heart, lung and asthmatic diseases has now led the UK government introducing laws to ban smoking in all public places. Such a ban will come into force in England on 1st July 2007 (BBC News, 2007). This ban covers all public places, including pubs, bars, offices, factories train station and buss stops while only privet homes and outdoor areas are excluded (BBC News, 2007). This paper begins by highlighting the arguments against the smoking ban, it will then go on to evaluate recent research in to the drawbacks of passive smoking providing counterarguments supporting smoking should be ban in public places.
It has been argued that smoking shouldn’t be ban in public places. The position goes on to assert that this is a free country and smokers should have their basic human rights to smoke anywhere they want to smoke, so this argument goes on. Indeed every one is for individual rights as long as it doesn’t effect others health. no one will argue that this is not a free country ,and every Individual must have the right to do as they like , infect as long as it dose not damage or affect someone else’s health or life . Definitely smokers have rights but so do non-smokers. Undeniably, it is currently well known fact based on scientific and medical research that smoking cigarette and passive smoking can be bad for your health. So this position goes on to assert that why should smokers be
As people becoming gradually more thoughtful with living longer and healthier lives, the harmful effects of habits and live styles have come under significant considerations. One of the issues which have been a controversial and mach debated subject within the lifestyle is the issue of smoking in the public places. The British Medical Health Association research has found that at least 1,000 people die in the UK every year as results of passive tobacco smoke. Other people tobacco smoke increases the chance of non-smokers contracting fatal heart, lung and asthmatic diseases has now led the UK government introducing laws to ban smoking in all public places. Such a ban will come into force in England on 1st July 2007 (BBC News, 2007). This ban covers all public places, including pubs, bars, offices, factories train station and buss stops while only privet homes and outdoor areas are excluded (BBC News, 2007). This paper begins by highlighting the arguments against the smoking ban, it will then go on to evaluate recent research in to the drawbacks of passive smoking providing counterarguments supporting smoking should be ban in public places.
It has been argued that smoking shouldn’t be ban in public places. The position goes on to assert that this is a free country and smokers should have their basic human rights to smoke anywhere they want to smoke, so this argument goes on. Indeed every one is for individual rights as long as it doesn’t effect others health. no one will argue that this is not a free country ,and every Individual must have the right to do as they like , infect as long as it dose not damage or affect someone else’s health or life . Definitely smokers have rights but so do non-smokers. Undeniably, it is currently well known fact based on scientific and medical research that smoking cigarette and passive smoking can be bad for your health. So this position goes on to assert that why should smokers be