Preview

The hound of the baskervilles

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
635 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The hound of the baskervilles
The Hound of the Baskervilles

The Hound of the Baskervilles was a very good page turner book. It had many clues to help you get a closer idea of who the real criminal was. As I kept on reading, the facts were getting clearer by the second and as different events past in the book I just wanted to keep reading the book to unmask that horrifying criminal and hope that he didn’t kill his next victim who was Sir Henry Baskerville at the end. In the paragraphs below I will be describing why I think Sherlock Holmes got involved in this case in the first place, why did he send Watson to pursue the case, rather than go himself or solve it with him, and If I was surprised to discover who the actual criminal was.

Sherlock Holmes got involved in the case of Sir Charles Baskerville’s death because Dr. Mortimer thought that Sherlock Holmes could help him with this case since he was considered the second best expert in Europe. Dr. Mortimer maybe heard from other people that Sherlock Holmes is a man who is a very dedicated to his work and is a very good investigator. Dr. Mortimer could have maybe also saw a newspaper that showed an important case solved by Sherlock Holmes. That must have showed an impression on Dr. Mortimer that Sherlock Holmes can help him with his problem. So he went on to Sherlock Holmes on Baker Street to present the case to him.

Sherlock Holmes sent Watson to pursue the case, rather than go himself or solve it with him for Watson’s own sake. If Sherlock Holmes would have went with Watson and Sir Henry Baskerville the criminal would have been worn to be on their guard meaning that they would have to be very careful of how they were going to plan things out. Then the case would be even more difficult to solve because the criminal could do things to mislead Watson and Sherlock Holmes into thinking something that is wrong. It was better for Watson to go alone because the criminal wouldn’t think

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Why Is Dr Roylott Guilty

    • 946 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Sherlock was not guilty due to the fact he did not know that Dr. Roylott would be bit by a snake; swamp adder. In the story, “The Adventures of the Speckled Band,” Dr. Roylott was murdered by his snake the he had trained over a period of time. Audience may believe that Sherlock was guilty and many think that he was not. In Sherlock’s offense, he did not mean to kill Dr. Roylott; meaning that the murder of Dr. Roylott was not premeditated. Also, Sherlock was self-defending himself. Sherlock did not want to die and he also had to protect the lives of two other people because it was his job. Helen had to hire Sherlock to protect her from her peculiar husband. Another reason in which that Sherlock should not be guilty is Sherlock did not know that Dr. Roylott was sitting in the chair next to the ventilator. Sherlock was certain that Dr. Roylott killed Julia and wanted to murder Helen due to money concerns.…

    • 946 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The author shows that Holmes is very mindful because he can notice things that the common person cannot. In the play Holmes begins to tell everyone what he observed and how he knew who committed the crime from the very beginning. “Elementary, my dear Watson. I knew that Spaulding was awfully keen to spend time in Mr.…

    • 218 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Mr. Hollow, I have a witness placing you at the front door just two hours before the victim’s death. Why did you go to her house?” asked Watson.…

    • 573 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Who Is Dr. Roylott Guilty

    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Sherlock Holmes was not guilty for the killing of Dr. Roylott, Dr. Roylott was the killer himself. Sherlock could not have any idea the Dr. Roylott was on the chair. There were multiple clues that Sherlock discovered in Dr. Roylott’s room to prove that Dr. Roylott was guilty, not Sherlock. Finally, Dr. Roylott had pre-planned the killings; therefore, Sherlock was protecting himself from Dr. Roylott’s plan. Sherlock Holmes should not…

    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    James Holmes Massacre

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages

    According to the police audio exposed in the documentary, Holmes did not resist arrest and was instead waiting for police to arrive and apprehend him. Undoubtedly, the suspect’s purpose in this heartless deed was incarceration. But when asked what the motive was during the interview, the chief did not go into details and instead answered “we are not speculating on motive”. Again, no one able to shed some light here. Whatever the motive may be, the suspect was sentenced to life in prison.…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Both detectives use reason and deduction from clues. For example, Holmes uses clues from Dr. Mortimer’s stick to infer that he is a country practitioner, had a spaniel, and was friendly with clients.…

    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The film of Sherlock Holmes is an open mystery--which means the identity of the perpetrator is already released in the beginning of the movie and it also display the “perfect crime” of the perpetrator throughout the movie. We can tell that is a open mystery because the first scene of the movie is where Sherlock Holmes and Dr. Watson are trying to prevent a black magic ritual that is run by Lord Blackwood. The police immediately arrested Lord Blackwood then few months later he got sentenced to death. Sherlock received a mail revealing that Lord Blackwood got out of the grave and it was a different man in the coffin. Sherlock decided to take mans watch and found initials of a pawnbroker shop. From then on, Sherlock can trace the man's address and when he finally entered the man's resident, Sherlock found different medical equipments, animals that were experimented on and found a paper that has Lord Blackwood's signature. Later on the movie, Sherlock got called to a secret place called “The Temple of Four” where black magic is practice and the man who called him goes by the name of Sir Thomas, Sherlock also made a definite conclusion that Sir Thomas is the father Lord Blackwood because if their…

    • 548 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Conclusion, I think all of these facts are enough evidence to prove my statement of Sherlock. So the three main reason why Sherlock Holmes did the wrong thing are. First of all, Sherlock let the thieves go after committing a crime. Seconded of all, He blamed the innocent plumber who had a family to look after. Third of all, Doing something and getting away with it could make you do it again since you got away with it. So I believe Sherlock Holmes did the wrong…

    • 414 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Have you ever stolen anything? Come on, you have done it before! Well, I know for sure that I have stolen something and I received some big consequences for doing it. Sherlock Holmes is a detective and he is on a case about Ryder, a criminal, and Ms. Cusack, Ryder’s apprentice or, companion, and they stole a Carbuncle. A Carbuncle is an expensive jewel that belonged to the Countess. Holmes eventually finds out who had stolen the jewel and stuffed it into a goose. I know right? A goose! Sherlock ends up letting Ryder and Cusack free. In my opinion, Sherlock Holmes positively made the wrong decision.…

    • 692 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sherlock Holmes is a very strange man. He is a detective who can solve a mystery without even seeing what seems to be like too much evidence. His ethics are very interesting. He believes that murder cases turn out to have very complex ways of happening. He does not believe in the solar system, which the narrator thought was very weird. His decision to join the case to help was a just decision, because without him the case wouldn’t have been solved correctly. Holmes seems to always stick with his beliefs, not matter what the situation was, even after the case seemed like it was solved.…

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Apush Summer Reading

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages

    5. This is an interesting question to think about in my opinion. Holmes had somewhat well-known motives in this book. These motives were clearly to murder and destroy people and places. People need to understand these motives so that they can stop them from occurring and t prevent other people to act like Holmes.…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Many people try not to make the same mistakes that their parents and grandparents did, whether it be a monetary, emotional, physical, or spiritual mistake, because their parents teach them during childhood. In The Hound of the Baskervilles, Henry doesn’t want to lose the mansion (and his life) like Sir Charles before him. People don’t want to lose their businesses or property the same way that their predecessors did before them. In And Then There Were None, everyone turns on each other in order to survive, but these characters are not good examples of normal people (as most of them have a few issues). A normal person tries to keep friendships. Descendants don’t want to break a friendship, so they learn from their parents and grandparents’ mistakes…

    • 146 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Sherlock Holmes

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Sherlock Holmes is a name with an enigmatic connotation. It means magnifying glasses and a British accent to most people. However, to me, it means noticing the obvious. It means finding deep, lasting friendship, alongside solutions to seemingly impossible mysteries. Sherlock Holmes is a mystery in and of himself, and that’s what makes him alive. The same goes for me, for you, and for the rest of the universe. Holmes taught me that our mysteries are solvable, no matter how complex, and that was one of the most valuable lessons I’ve ever…

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The main protagonist, Sherlock Holmes is an observant, intelligent, and egotistic detective. He sometimes lacks the empathy needed in basic human relationships but manages to maintain a close friendship with his partner and roommate, Dr. John Watson. Also Holmes is able to understand the factor of human emotions in a crime…

    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    It seems like this story is another example of selfishness and stupidity. Once again Holmes and Watson come together to solve another mystery. An engineer (Victor) came from a job in Eyford with his thumb chopped off. He requests the aid of both Watson and Holmes as the man he has been working for is not as he appeared to be. Colonel Stark (or Fritz as later revealed) hires Victor to repair his hydraulic press so he could harvest fuller’s earth and turn them into bricks, but actually Stark is using the machine for something else. Holmes figures out that Stark and his allies are counterfeiters, but it was too late to catch them as they had already fled and the house that the press was in, was destroyed. It sad to see that criminals in this case…

    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays