Preview

The Real Apology Essay Example

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
603 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Real Apology Essay Example
The Real Apology the American People Needed On September 11, 1998, President Clinton gave his infamous speech he titled “I have Sinned” at the Prayer Breakfast. In this speech, he addressed the issue of having a sexual relationship with a woman named Monica Lewinsky and apologized for his actions. The nature of his first speech seemed more of “self-defense” rather than the apology the American people wanted to hear (59). In the attempt to have a successful speech, President Bill Clinton had to have a remorseful, yet confident attitude that did not come across insensitive. I believe that in his speech, he was truly sincere and meant his apology. The beginning when President Clinton said, “I do not think there is a fancy way to say that I have sinned,” clearly shows the content of this speech will be different from the first. However, Clinton giving his speech in front of an audience presents the idea of it being more personal. In the first speech, known as the “Map Room Speech”, there was never a real apology; Clinton seemed to say the American people should apologize to him, rather than him apologizing to the people (59). This confused many people and the state of the speech seemed doomed.
Clinton asked for forgiveness, in his breakfast prayer speech, early on. “I have asked all for their forgiveness”. Also, he spoke about the steps he could take to make things right again. When he states, “First, I will instruct my lawyers to mount a vigorous defense, using all available appropriate arguments. But legal language must not obscure the fact that I have done wrong,” lets the people know he is dealing with the legal matter of the subject, but he is not going to hide that he has done wrong.
In addition, he spoke about how the young can look at him as a role model for learning and growing from their mistakes (60). In his speech Clinton says, “The children of this country can learn in a profound way that integrity is important and selfishness is wrong,” this

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    On January 22, 2001 George F. Will wrote a political article for News weekly called, “Let Us…? No, Give It A Rest.” In this article Will discusses the history of the Inaugural address and how they reflect the changes our country has made throughout the many years and presidential parties. He identifies numerous differences or changes in the sentence structure and the number of words used, topics discussed, and even the tone that is used by the President’s. He points out first the 43rd president, George W. Bush. The second sentence of his inaugural speech contained 87 words.…

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The 1990s was a critical time for modern America, with the changing mindsets and the conflicting standards of the American populace Bill Clinton’s presidency was one to be remembered. The book gives information over many of the actions of Bill Clinton’s presidency that ordinary citizens would not have had prior knowledge of with the hectic nature of the 1990s. Many of his actions were overshadowed by other events, such as the trial of OJ Simpson, the Oklahoma Bombing, and changing ideas about sexuality and race. Some of his actions were recognized though such as the Monica Lewinski scandal, the Gennifer Flowers scandal, and how much power his wife had in office. Through the years our view of Bill Clinton as a president has been negative and often condescending, but Gil Troy takes time to look at…

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Clintons Fault for 9/11

    • 682 Words
    • 3 Pages

    With each terrorist attack, Clinton went before the American people on more than one occasion saying "those responsible would be hunted down and punished"" (Sept. 11: Bill Clinton‘s Ultimate Legacy) However, which each terrorist attack, Clinton backed down, showing negligence towards…

    • 682 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is a common mistake that people assume that Bill Clinton was impeached based solely on the fact that he had an inappropriate relationship with Monica Lewinsky. Some people believe that Clinton was impeached for political reasons, not for constitutional reasons (billofrightsinstitute.org), despite documentation and facts that state otherwise. For some it may remain a mystery. For others who have to live with the burden and guilt of these events, thy know the truth. These people know what they did and exactly how it hurt…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As I have made painfully clear throughout the course of this analysis, there is nothing that could be considered remotely close to evidence provided for Clinton’s claims that America should move on that and that it is not a matter of importance for the Commander in Chief to commit perjury. The only means of support for these claims comes in the form of irrelevant, presumptuous, ambiguous, or misleading statements which I can only conclude are meant to confuse or trick the audience into agreement. Given that this is the case, I must say that anyone who was convinced by this speech was simply dazzled by that pretty top…

    • 1283 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    President Clinton was charged for perjury, obstruction of justice, manipulation of witnesses and abuse of power, and also for engaging in a sexual relationship between the president and Monica Lewinsky. On December 19, 1998 President Clinton was impeach. On February 12, 1999 the Senate voted to remove President Clinton from the presidency. As big surprise for all Americans, President Clinton was released from all charges that he was accused. The senate voted and the results were " 45 Democrats and 10 Republicans voted" not guilty, Rejecting the first charge of perjury, "and under the obstruction of justice charge, the prosecutor's office required a two-thirds majority to convict, but did not achieve even a simple majority. Senate divided…

    • 139 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    "Her eyes were blue with age. Her skin had a pattern all its own of…

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Executive Privilege

    • 2337 Words
    • 10 Pages

    References: Baker, Peter, and Susan Schmidt. "Washingtonpost.com Special Report: Clinton Accused." Washington Post: Breaking News, World, US, DC News & Analysis. N.p., 6 May 1998. Web. 8 Nov. 2012. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/clinton/stories/starr050698.…

    • 2337 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Sunflower - Response

    • 1224 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Oxford English Dictionary defines forgiveness as ‘to grant free pardon and to give up all claim on account of an offense or debt.’ However, many philosophers, academics and religious leaders alike, agree that there is more to forgiveness than simply pardoning a person for the acts which they have committed. As Harold Kushner observed, “Forgiving happens inside of us. It represents a letting go of the sense of grievance, and perhaps most importantly (sic) a letting go of the role of victim.” Therefore, if one were to oversimplify ‘true forgiveness,’ ‘true forgiveness’ must encompass two things. Firstly, ‘true forgiveness’ must ‘grant free pardon and give up all claim on account of an offense.’ In other words, ‘true forgiveness,’ must fully absolve the acts of another and thereby relieve a large portion of the guilt and remorse that the person seeking forgiveness feels. Secondly, forgiving another must relieve the personal and internal pain and anguish that the person seeking forgiveness has caused. While we can never forget the acts that the…

    • 1224 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Presidential Oath Essay

    • 1051 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Blomquist’s article, “The Presidential Oath, the American National Interest and a Call for Presiprudence,” he devotes a section to exploring what presidents have said about the oath in their inaugural speeches. During his second inaugural speech, George Washington spoke these words: “This oath I am now about to take, and in your presence: that if it shall be found during my administration of the Government I have in any instance violated willingly or knowingly the injunctions thereof, I may (besides incurring constitutional punishment) be subject to the upbraidings of all who are now witnesses of the present solemn ceremony.” Our first president acknowledged that he was held accountable by and to this oath, and was subject to legal punishment as well as public ridicule if he were to violate it. Thomas Jefferson took an equally sober position in his 1801 inaugural speech when he said that he availed himself to “declare a sincere consciousness that the task is above my talents, and that I approach it with those anxious and awful presentiments which the greatness of the change and the weakness of my powers so justly inspire.” Jefferson’s humility while taking this office is astounding. Have we lost the respect that the Founding Fathers had for the executive office? Jefferson shows a reverence appropriate for the great responsibility of the chief executive of this…

    • 1051 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Organizational Behaviour

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages

    (4) Apologies: Admitting responsibility for an undesirable event and simultaneously seeking to get a pardon for the action .…

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ljb Company

    • 601 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The President is still quite embarrassed because he had to fire one of his employees for viewing pornography on a company computer. He later found out this individual was a convicted felon who served time for molesting children. The company had a hard time getting the employee to admit it was him because the company does not assign…

    • 601 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In President Clinton speech it sounds like he is apologizing to the people of the Rwandan genocide like he is the one who did it to them. But when he says “We owe to those who died and to those who survived, who loved them, our every effort to increase our vigilance and strengthen” it makes it seem like he was apologizing for something he did himself, but he did not commit the Rwanda genocide. Also when he says “We owe to all the people of the world who are at risk because each bloodletting hastens.” This sound like he is apologizing because it sounds like he owes them something for what he did. But President Clinton didn’t do anything to anyone. He is apologizing in this speech when he had no part in the Rwanda genocide. And I can get why…

    • 192 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to “Oklahoma Bombing Memorial Address” it states, “The hurt you feel must not be allowed to turn into hate, but instead into the search for justice. The loss you feel must not paralyze your own lives. Instead, you must try to pay tribute to your loved ones by continuing to do all things they left undone, thus ensuring they did not die in vain.”(Lines 36-40). This was a letter from a widow whose husband was murdered when Pan Am 103 was shot down. She is acknowledging that she has felt the pain that the people are feeling right now over the loss of a loved one. She is implying that you shouldn’t let the hurt you feel be turned into hatred and your life shouldn’t be consumed by the feeling of hatred you feel right now. Clinton puts this in his speech to show a person who went through the feeling of hatred that have overcome it and look at the positive side of the situation. In addition, Clinton is influencing the American people’s actions when you have lost a loved one to pay tribute in their…

    • 737 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A no-fault divorce: a good thing or bad thing? A no-fault divorce is divorces in which neither spouse is required to prove “fault” or marital misconduct on the part of the other. To obtain a divorce a spouse must merely assert incompatibility or irreconcilable difference, meaning the marriage has irretrievably broken down. This means there is no defense to a divorce petition (so a spouse cannot threaten to “fight” a divorce), there is no derogatory testimony, and martial misconduct cannot be used to achieve a division of property favorable to the “innocent” spouse. A no-fault divorce is what you hear about more often now. Marriages are ending because of irreconcilable differences and I always wondered what that meant because I didn’t understand. I always wanted to know exactly what. Now that I’m older and a little wiser I have learned that people get divorced because of all sorts of things. One of the biggest things I know of is communication. If you don’t communicate it will not work plain and simple. The second biggest thing is money. I mean we all know that money is evil, it will split up the happiest home so why not a marriage. I put adultery last because most of the time we know if the other spouse is cheating and most of us stick around anyway because of whatever reason. I think adultery has become more of a problem these days but causes the least amount of divorces. A no-fault divorce will give you a chance to just sign the papers and move on. I feel that if this is what we both want that there is no need to go into details about why we are getting a divorce if we have come to some sort of agreement. Let’s just end this and be about our separate way. I think a no-fault divorce may become more of an issue when children are involved because now we have to go into more details of why this divorce is happening and try to explain to the children why we are separating (because they are going to ask why) and before you do divorce you have to also think about how…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays