This Case on Parable of Sadhu Is Basically Focused on Difference Between Individual Ethics Essay Example
CAbstract: * This case on parable of sadhu is basically focused on difference between individual ethics and group ethics(Corporate ethics).In this case, Mr. McCoy along with his team is on a 2nd trek to Himalayas. Team has already reached to height of 14,500’ and some team members are critical and tired. A sadhu is being handed over to the team by NewZelander’s. The team faces a conflict of whether to save sadhu or leave him and trek ahead. The team leaves sadhu with essentials and treks ahead . On reaching top Stephen alleges that they have reached on top sacrificing life of Sadhu over their personal aspiration
The Thinking Processes
The Thinking Processes emerged as TOC practitioners worked with organizations that needed to identify their core constraints and how to manage or elevate them. They needed the answers to three deceptively simple questions:
• What to change?
• To what to change?
• How to cause the change?
The Thinking Processes are based on the scientific method, to which is added a simple visual language, the Thinking Process Diagrams, that are used for describing and reasoning about situations, arguments, and plans using the language of Cause and Effect. There are two basic kinds of reasoning: Sufficient Cause and Necessary Condition.
The Thinking Process Tools
From the basic Thinking Processes developed several techniques called the Thinking Process Tools designed to answer the three questions. The tools provide the ability to develop a complete picture of a system’s core constraints and how to manage them. Tool | Thinking Process | Starting Point | End Result | Current Reality Tree (CRT) | Sufficient Cause | A set of undesirable symptoms | The core cause of the symptoms (constraint) | Evaporating Cloud | Necessary Condition | A perceived conflict underlying a constraint | Possible win-win solutions | Future Reality Tree (FRT) | Sufficient Cause | A proposed solution | Necessary changes that
The Thinking Processes
The Thinking Processes emerged as TOC practitioners worked with organizations that needed to identify their core constraints and how to manage or elevate them. They needed the answers to three deceptively simple questions:
• What to change?
• To what to change?
• How to cause the change?
The Thinking Processes are based on the scientific method, to which is added a simple visual language, the Thinking Process Diagrams, that are used for describing and reasoning about situations, arguments, and plans using the language of Cause and Effect. There are two basic kinds of reasoning: Sufficient Cause and Necessary Condition.
The Thinking Process Tools
From the basic Thinking Processes developed several techniques called the Thinking Process Tools designed to answer the three questions. The tools provide the ability to develop a complete picture of a system’s core constraints and how to manage them. Tool | Thinking Process | Starting Point | End Result | Current Reality Tree (CRT) | Sufficient Cause | A set of undesirable symptoms | The core cause of the symptoms (constraint) | Evaporating Cloud | Necessary Condition | A perceived conflict underlying a constraint | Possible win-win solutions | Future Reality Tree (FRT) | Sufficient Cause | A proposed solution | Necessary changes that