Preview

virginia v morre

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1241 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
virginia v morre
Virginia v. Moore
272 Va. 717

Facts: The day was February 20,2003, in the city of Portsmouth where two Portsmouth police officers had pulled a vehicle over who was driven by David Lee Moore. While listening to police radio they had heard that the man they pulled over who went by the nickname “chubs” was driving on a suspended license. The officer’s soon determined that chubbs was indeed driving on a suspended license. The officers who made the stop arrested chubbs for the misdemeanor of driving on a suspended license. This violation could have lead to chubbs serving a 1-year in jail and a $25,000 fine, according to Va Code Ann 18.2-11. The officers then searched the vehicle in which chubbs was driving. During the search of the vehicle the officers found 16 grams of crack cocaine and $516 in cash. The state law of Virginia states that the officers should have offered Moore a summons rather than arresting him. The statutes of the Fourth Amendment give the officers the right to search if they believe a crime was committed in their presence. The act of driving on a suspended license is not an offense you can be arrested for unlike other misdemeanors. Moore was charged with intent to sell crack cocaine. When Moore was first brought to trial, He filed a pretrial motion to attempt to suppress the evidence. He thought that he should not have had his vehicle searched without a warrant. From the original search and arrest he felt like his rights as a citizen had been violated. In Virginia they do not require suppression of evidence, which was obtained through the fourth amendment. When the trial court had it they discussed the option of suppressing the evidence, which would be being used against him in his trial, but denied the motion. The bench trial soon found him guilty of drug charges. Moore was sentenced to a Five-year prison term and one year and six months suspended sentence. The case went to a panel of Virginia’s intermediate court on the grounds of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The case Heien v. North Carolina came about on April 29, 2010 when an officer started “following a suspicious vehicle, Sergeant Matt Darisse noticed that only one of the vehicle's brake lights was working and pulled the driver over. While issuing a warning ticket for the broken brake light, Darisse became suspicious of the actions of the two occupants and their answers to his questions. Petitioner Nicholas Brady Heien, the car's owner, gave Darisse consent to search the vehicle. Darisse found cocaine, and Heien was arrested and charged with attempted trafficking.” After denial of his motion to suppress, defendant entered a guilty plea in the North Carolina Superior Court… the North Carolina Court of Appeals reversed…The North…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Officer Benda pulled up behind him, blocking the man in his parking space. The man, William Tate, was asleep/passed out at the steering wheel with the car on and in park. Officer Benda reported that the man had several open or empty beer cans around him. Officer Benda then knocked on the window and asked the man to turn off the engine and step out of the car. According to the officer, Tate had difficultly balancing and had the smell of alcohol on him. The officer arrested Tate for driving under the influence and when in the car on the way to the jail, Officer Benda told Tate that his license was revoked and should not have been driving. At the Jail, Tate had a blood sample taken to establish his blood-alcohol level.…

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The court agrees that there is error in Richmond’s claim that his statement given to Fr. Osing in the concluding capacity as a priest.…

    • 386 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A Kentucky grand jury charged King with trafficking marijuana and trafficking of a controlled substance. King filed motion to suppress the evidence found in the warrantless search, but the trial court denied the motion. King entered a conditionally guilty plea, under which he reserved the right to appeal the denial of his suppression motion. The Kentucky Court of Appeals affirmed the lower court’s decision, saying that “exigent circumstances justified the warrantless entry because the…

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Courts have held that when police arrest a person on a traffic violation it is not reasonable to believe that evidence of the violation is in the vehicle. In United States v. Majette, the court held that it was unreasonable for the officer to believe he would find evidence of the arrestee’s suspended license in the arrestee’s vehicle. 326 F. App'x 211, 213 (4th Cir. 2009). There, the officer arrested the defendant for driving with a suspended license. Id. at 212. After the arrest, the officer searched the defendant’s vehicle. Id. The court found that there was no reasonable basis that the officer would find evidence of a suspended license inside the defendant’s vehicle. Id. at 213. The court likely found this because the evidence of driving with a suspended license is not something that has physical evidence. There is a system that officers’ check when they run a person’s license number. Therefore, the officer did not need to search the vehicle to find evidence of the suspended license because before the search he had called his dispatcher to check if the arrestee had a…

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Evans (1995), the respondent was stopped because of a routine traffic stop. The officer’s computer indicated that there was a misdemeanor warrant out for the respondent’s arrest. The officer search his car and found marijuana in it, so the officer charged him with possession. The respondent tried to have the marijuana suppressed as evidence since his warrant had been squashed since before the arrest. This was denied because the purpose of the exclusionary rule wouldn't be served if they dismissed evidence that was obtained by error of employees. These employees were not directly associated with the arresting officer. So the arresting officer had no way of knowing that the misdemeanor warrant wasn't valid. Since the error was a clerical error exclusionary rule was not applied to suppress the…

    • 1275 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the 1920s, American stardom was on the rise. With the birth of the movie “star”, the public was more focused than ever on Hollywood. The crowds rejoiced when actors and actresses made blockbuster movies, but came down with harsh criticism if this perfect image was shattered. This is evident in the case of Virginia Rappe, a popular silent film actress who died in the days following a party with the biggest star at the time, Roscoe “Fatty” Arbuckle. The case was based on the assumption that her death, caused by a ruptured bladder, was due to being raped by Arbuckle. This case was filled with many conflicting testimonies along with the influence of the press making the persecution of Arbuckle impossible.…

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Mildred Jeter, an African-American woman, and Richard Loving, a white man, went to Washington, D.C, to get married and avoid Virginia’s interracial marriage ban. When they returned to Virginia not long after, the Lovings were arrested under the charges of violating Virginia’s interracial marriage ban.…

    • 189 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Virginia on April 7th 2003 a divided United States Supreme Court opened the possibility of constitutionally restricting certain types of hate speech. The court was to hear a case that spoke to one specific Virginia state statute that prohibited cross burning with the intent to intimidate, and also rendered that any such burning shall be prima facie evidence of an intent to intimidate a person or group. This court would see this statute being used between two separate cases. The first case was against Barry Black; in August of 1998 Black led a Ku Klux Klan rally at which the conclusion resulted in the burning of a cross on private property with the permission of the owner. Black was charged under the state statute, “Burning a cross with the intent to intimidate.” [347] The jury was instructed in accordance with the Model Jury Instruction that the burning of the cross by itself is sufficient evidence from which you may infer the required intent. [364] In May 1998 Richard Elliot and Jonathan O’Mara attempted to burn a cross on the lawn of Elliot’s neighbor and were charged in accordance under the cross-burning statute. After all of the respondents were convicted, they appealed to the Supreme Court of Virginia arguing that the cross-burning statute is unconstitutional. The Virginia Supreme court reversed all the convictions holding that the Virginia cross-burning statute is analytically indistinguishable from the ordinance found…

    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Missouri v McNeely

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A Missouri police officer stopped Tyler McNeely after observing it exceeding the posted speed limit and repeatedly crossing the center line. The officer noticed McNeely’s bloodshot eyes, his slurred speech, and a smell of alcohol on his breath. McNeely performed poorly on a battery of field sobriety tests, and he declined to take a Breathalyzer test. When McNeely indicated he refuse a breath sample for testing, the officer took him to a nearby hospital for blood alcohol test. The officer explained to McNeely that under Missouri’s implied consent law, refusal to submit voluntarily to the blood test would lead to an immediate one-year suspension of his driver’s license and could be used against him in any future prosecution. The testing of the blood indicated that the blood alcohol level was significantly above the legal limit. McNeely had challenged the blood test evidence claiming that there should have been a search warrant before ordering a blood sample.…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dc Vs Blake Case Essay

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Carter. Carter and Johns, the defendants in this case, were convicted at the state level of conspiracy to commit a controlled substance crime in the first degree. The defendants were temporary guests in Thompsons home. An officer witnessed the three individuals through a gap in a drawn window blind engaged in illegal activity which appeared to be the bagging of cocaine. The defendants appealed their case, stating that their Fourth Amendment right was violated due to an illegal search and seizure. Ultimately, the Supreme Court upheld the original decision based on the grounds that the defendants Fourth Amendment rights only pertained to them in their own dwelling or as an extended guest in another’s dwelling, not merely because they were temporarily…

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Loving v Virginia a married couple from Washington D.C. moved to Virginia where they were then subject to Virginia’s anti-miscegenation statute. Anti-miscegenation laws prohibit the marrying of different races with another. In Virginia, this statute prohibited the marriage between whites and any other race. Richard Loving, a white man, and Mildred Jeter, a black woman, were married in Washington D.C. They then moved to the state of Virginia where they faced criminal charges. Both of them pled guilty and were sentenced to one year imprisonment but the sentence would be waved for 25 years if they moved out of state and didn’t return.…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    R. v. Morgentaler was decided by the Supreme Court of Canada, a verdict which declared abortion laws in the Criminal Code of Canada as arbitrary and unconstitutional. The court ruled the laws to have violated the woman's right to security of the person under section 7 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms to security of person. After the ruling, you could not be charged under the Criminal Code of Canada for having an abortion without consent of the therapeutic abortion committee.…

    • 1283 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Most importantly, the 1905 Jacobsen v. Massachusetts was a Supreme Court case whereby the Court upheld the ultimate states’ authority to impose compulsory vaccination laws. It articulated that an individual’s freedom should at times be subjected to the states’ police power and subordinated to the collective public welfare. The Court decision in the case elicited numerous questions regarding the state government’s power to safeguard the public's health, as well as the protection of personal liberty as enshrined in the Constitution. The Court also articulated that the states had the authority to protect its citizens from dangers of diseases for their own good, which necessitated the enforcement of the compulsory vacation laws (NCBI, 2005).…

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions sparked great controversy throughout the United States during 1798 and 1799. The resolutions were manifestos that protested against the Federalist Alien and Sedition Acts. The authors of the resolutions remained anonymous, but were written by James Madison and Thomas Jefferson, who were upset with how the Federalists were ruling the nation. These two republicans knew something needed to be done for the central government to be limited and the states to gain more power.…

    • 675 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays