Preview

Why Did the Peasants' Revolt in 1381? Essay Example

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1290 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Did the Peasants' Revolt in 1381? Essay Example
The Peasants' Revolt, Tyler’s Rebellion, or the Great Rising of 1381 was one of a number of popular revolts in late medieval Europe and is a major event in the history of England. The names of some of its leaders, John Ball, Wat Tyler and Jack Straw, are still familiar even though very little is actually known about these individuals.

Tyler's Rebellion is significant because it marked the beginning of the end of serfdom in medieval England. Tyler's Rebellion led to calls for the reform of feudalism in England and an increase in rights for the serf class.

Contents [hide]
1 Events leading to the revolt
2 First protests
3 Storming the Tower of London
4 Smithfield
5 The Cutty Wren
6 Literary mention
7 Further reading
8 Footnotes

[edit] Events leading to the revolt
The revolt was precipitated by heavy-handed attempts to enforce the third poll tax, first levied in 1377 supposedly to finance military campaigns overseas — a continuation of the Hundred Years' War initiated by King Edward III of England. The third poll tax, unlike the two earlier, was not levied on a flat rate basis (as in 1377) nor according to schedule (as in 1379), but in a manner that appeared more arbitrary and hence unfair: it was also set at 3 Groat compared with the 1377 rate of 1 groat. The young King, Richard II, was also another reason for the uprising, as he was only 14 at the time, and therefore unpopular men such as John of Gaunt (the acting regent), Simon Sudbury (Chancellor and Archbishop of Canterbury) and Sir Robert Hales (the Lord Treasurer, responsible for the poll tax) were left to rule instead, and many saw them as corrupt officials, trying to exploit the weakness of the King. A longer-term factor was the way the Statute of Labourers of 1351 was enforced. The Black Death that ravaged England in 1348 and 1349 had greatly reduced the labour force, and, as a consequence, labourers were able to demand enhanced terms and conditions. The Statute attempted to curb

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Throughout the years 1536-69 five rebellions took place, all of which could be interpreted as a dangerous challenge to the monarch and the state, at the same time all of which can be interpreted as not a dangerous challenge instead could even have strengthen the monarch and the state. Source X agrees with the statement as ‘each monarch faced at least one serious revolt.’ Source V suggest that a lack of leadership, organisation and ‘geographic limits’ hindered the success of many rebellions such as the northern rebellion or the pilgrimage of grace. Source W agrees with the statement ‘in the right hands and with the right circumstances’ popular protest in the sixteen century could have posed a dangerous challenge to the monarch and the state. I will interpret these sources to determine whether the rebellions of the 16th century did or did not pose a dangerous challenge to the monarch and the state.…

    • 1226 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In 1489, the Yorkshire Rebellion arose due to conflict between the Earl of Northumberland and the Commons of Northumberland and Yorkshire, who were reluctant to pay more taxes. The rebellion was sparked after the Earl of Northumberland was killed – when attempting to explain the need for a new set of taxes. It is significant that though his own entourage were present, they stood by as their master was attacked – this highlights the resentment felt by ordinary people over the high tax demands, and explains some of the anger felt. Henry managed to quell the rebellion swiftly after this; the ringleader – John Chamber – was hanged, along with his accomplices. However, following the rebellion Henry did not attempt to raise taxes so significantly in Yorkshire and Northumberland again; this is an example of his policies suffering as a result of the challenges to his throne. Overall, although just a local affair with no significant impact to Henry’s royal authority, the Yorkshire Rebellion highlighted some key issues. Colin Pendrill points out how the whole debacle was “another reason for Henry to feel insecure” and highlights the fact that his country “saw him as a foreign usurper”. In addition, it took the death of the Earl of Northumberland to make Henry pay attention to the whole affair; this suggests that he was out-of-touch and insensitive towards the ordinary people of Britain. Therefore, although Henry…

    • 1646 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Tudor governments were relatively successful in dealing with the problem of rebellion, although this was more effective towards the end of the period than at the beginning shown through the decline in rebellion after 1549: only 5 English rebellions occurred as opposed to 10 before 1549. Over the course of the Tudor period the main aims of rebellions were only fully achieved in the rebellions of 1525, the Amicable Grant and 1553. In addition to this the reforms made to local government, policies directly implemented by central government and the effects of trials and retribution, such as Henry VII’s concessions made to the late 15th century pretenders, Lambert Simnell and Perkin Warbeck and later in the period during Elizabeth’s reign, who recognised rebel Shane O’Neil as Earl of Tyrone, all contributed to the reduction in the frequency and scale of English rebellions. Pre-emptive strikes implemented by Tudor governments were also instrumental, especially during the start of the period in Henry’s reign and later in Elizabeth’s reign, in preventing rebellion or stopping riots from becoming dangerous rebellions. In some areas these strategies and tactics worked better in some areas than others; Irish rebellions were generally more costly and more difficult to suppress.…

    • 2557 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    To some extent the rebellion of the Northern Earls was the most significant rebellion in the Tudor period because they had proven to be a serious threat as the rebellion was lead by two of the leading families, Northumberland and Westmoreland. But despite this, I don’t think it was the most significant rebellion because if we put the fact they wanted to release Mary Queen of Scots, there was no purpose to the rebellion because there was no popular enthusiasm to replace Elizabeth with a foreigner or restore the Pope, and also the Earls (Northumberland and Westmoreland) were cowards to a point because as soon as they heard rumours that the queen had summoned massive forces for them, they turned around and headed back north instead of facing them. In my personal opinion, I think that the Pilgrimage of Grace was the most significant because it showed how to raise a large scale rising in a small period of time and it also showed the divided opinions of the people, as there were a variety of reasons; Religion, Political, Social and Economical.…

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Rebellion of 1837 was a battle between the habitants of Upper and Lower Canada and the Canadian government. More importantly it was a battle for righteousness between the French and the English. The habitants believed the problem with the government was the structure in Canada. All of Canada's power was derived from the Governor, the Executive Council and Legislative Council. British government appointed the two councils. The other chamber of legislature was the Legislative Assembly. The assembly was elected by the people and mostly composed of French Canadians. The crisis that triggered the rebellion first arose in Lower Canada. The population of Lower Canada was mostly French Canadians. They made up the Legislative Assembly, but their power in government was futile.…

    • 1552 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Justinian Plague Analysis

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages

    It was a significant contributor to the Peasants’ Revolt of 1381, the largest revolt Medieval England had ever seen or was to see again. There was a severe population drop, and manual labor was much more difficult to find. The law said that peasants could not leave their home village unless their lord allowed it, but it was ignored by desperate lords in other villages, who openly supported and encouraged peasants to leave their home villages and come work for them. When peasants left their home villages, their original lords refused to let them return. Peasants demanded higher wages, since they knew that lords were desperate for work. A statute was passed, making it so peasants could not be paid more than they had been paid in 1346 (before the Black Death), and could not leave their village under any circumstances. This riled up the peasants and they grew very wrathful, leading to the revolt in…

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Peasants’ Revolt The Peasants’ revolt of 1381 (also known as Wat Tyler’s Rebellion) was caused by the imposition of the unpopular poll tax. In 1377, John of Gaunt imposed a new tax, the Poll Tax, that was to cover the cost of the war. Unlike normal taxes, this was to be paid by the peasants, as well as the landowners. The peasants were at the bottom of the Feudal System and had to obey their local lord to whom they had sworn an oath of obedience on the Bible.…

    • 667 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many people think rebellions are a bad thing. Those people probably do not know that there were three rebellions that would change America for the better. The three rebellions happened in three key states/colonies. Shays’ Rebellion was in Massachusetts, the Whiskey Rebellion was in Pennsylvania and Bacon’ Rebellion was in the colony of Virginia. The most important rebellion was Shays’ Rebellion because it gave this country the need for a stronger central government.…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In "Famine, Affluence, and Morality," Peter Singer is trying to argue that "the way people in relatively affluent countries react to a situation… cannot be justified; indeed,… our moral conceptual scheme needs to be altered and with it, the way of life that has come to be taken for granted in our society"(Singer 230). Peter Singer provides striking examples to show the reader how realistic his arguments are. In this paper, I will briefly give a summary of Peter Singer's argument and the assumptions that follow, adding personal opinions for or against Peter's statements. I hope that within this paper, I am able to be clearly show you my thoughts in regards to Singer.…

    • 2045 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The rebellions which occurred during the reign of Edward VI were mainly religious and not political in origin. The political reasons for the rebellions are that there were absent landlords, mainly because they were in the council, which meant the peasants had no-one to stop them and the incompetent advisors, Peter Carew, sent down to deal with the issue. The religious reasons were that the reforms of Somerset had not gone far enough and the majority of the clergy were uneducated and the common prayer book was produced. The economic reasons for the rebellions were that illegal enclosures were being torn down by government commissions, but the peasants wanted to take matters into their own hands and the sheep tax was hitting the poor harder than it should’ve done.…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    miss

    • 627 Words
    • 2 Pages

    During July and August 1483 a series of rebellion took place in the south and midlands counties. This was just a month into Richard III’s reins. One of the most surprising things about these rebellions was that the Duke of Buckingham (who had once been one of Richard III’s most loyal supporters) was one of the main orchestrators. There is much debate amongst historians as to Buckingham’s ultimate aims.…

    • 627 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    With a decrease in population, aristocrats were looking for laborers. The prices dropped and the lord’s incomes fell. Peasants faced similar economic limitations as the aristocrats. The aristocrats tried to restrict wages and created new taxes. Peasants started to complain across Europe about these problems and revolts started occurring. These were known as the peasant revolts, which was the destruction of societal order after the Black Death. They were sparked by social class tension and the peasants were angered about how to upper class treated them. Clashes happened between the rich and the poor, which led to the destruction of castles and murder of nobles. The revolts eventually failed as the upper classes, ruthlessly killed the rebels and arrested them. After the revolts , poll taxes was cut , and a lot of the rebels were pardoned. They had gains for those who participated, they were also crushed quickly and the benefits got lost. The revolts signified an era of societal conflict that distinguished future European…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Until the twentieth century, Russia remained under the Medieval feudalistic social structure which had three basic levels. First, a czar ruled the country as an autocratic, and frequently despotic, monarch. Rich nobles, the next level in this society, owned vast quantities of land and also served in government posts. Last of all came the rest of the Russian people—the peasants or serfs. Serfs had few rights and worked for the nobility their whole lives. They were little better than slaves and lived in abject poverty.…

    • 1261 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The document called the “English Peasants’ Revolt, 1381” discusses the beginning of the end of the Peasant Revolt. The document begins with King Richard II proclaiming that all of the common people within London should come to Smithfield. Accompanying Richard was the Mayor of London named William Walworth. Meeting the both Richard and Willian was the “chieftain” of the rebellion Walter Tyler. Before the chaos ensued, both the King and Walter discussed what was needed to put a peaceful end to the revolt. For Walter and the common people to peacefully return back to their homes, they needed a “great oath” of the King, in which a charter would be created for the betterment of equality for all men. Within this charter, Walter demanded more equality…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Peasants Revolt takes place where peasants riot against society and try to move up in society, but are all killed. They thought they were doing what Luther said, but there actions were actually condemned by Luther.…

    • 1720 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays