Your response analysis should include an explanation of your belief incorporating concepts and terms that have been discussed up to this point (all ways of knowing) and reference to the problem of accuracy within the town (i.e. make sure as you respond you use aspects of the above example to help explain your point of view). Keep in mind that addressing the Wok can be done by discussing the effects they have on each other (i.e. as you discuss perception you may want to reference the impact emotion has, specifically within the context of your response). Try to resist simply listing each Wok and saying here is how it impacts. Your response should also include your perspective as a knower. Be sure to address counterclaims to your point(s) of view.
In the story, we know that the church sets its time according to the clockmaker’s time. And the clockmaker sets his clocks according to the ringing of the church’s bell. But how do we know that the actual time is right? Well according to the ways of knowing, this knowledge that the citizens hold are proven true. For example, faith, the people have faith in each other to have the correct time, and they believe that it IS the correct time. Since they all believe this common knowledge, therefore it will be ‘true’ (for them).
Despite the ways of knowledge, I believe that one can never be certain about knowledge. I believe there is no true knowledge. Knowledge is all about perspective, due the affects of culture, habits and etc. These aspects shaped us to have unique perspective and to think differently, therefore believe what we think is true. For example, when Columbus found America, the natives believed that the world (Earth) was flat. They believed that if they kept walking, they would eventually fall off and never be able to return. We might all think it is silly to believe that but according to the ways of knowledge, this fast holds true. They used language, sense