GLOBAL REASONING TEST PRACTICE TEST © COPYRIGHT 2008 PROCTER & GAMBLE CINCINNATI‚ OH 45202 U.S.A. WARNING: All rights reserved. No part of this booklet may be reproduced in any form or by any means without expressed written permission. 2 PRACTICE TEST OVERVIEW PURPOSE This practice test is provided to help you understand the rules for answering the Reasoning Test by giving you: • • • • The exact instructions that you will receive when taking the actual Reasoning Test Suggestions and strategies
Premium Question Assessment Multiple choice
Individual Influence of Moral Reasoning I am interested in the actions of star witness Mike McQueary. I am not going to focus on the abuse I am focusing on the morality of the decisions Mike McQueary made when he saw the abuse. It is his actions that drive me to answer the Individual Influence of Moral Reasoning. Mike McQueary reported to administration that Jerry Sandusky engaged in a sexual act with a student in 2001. What I am interested in about his actions is that when they were not appropriately
Premium Pennsylvania Ethics Morality
In Benjamin Franklin’s autobiography Franklin speaks of human reasoning‚ explaining how he himself reasoned his way to eating fish without eating animal food. Although Franklin does oppose his agreement of not eating animal food‚ he argues how humans are these “reasonable creatures” that can come up with a good reason for them to do what they want. A reason is like an excuse that can be used to get what you want. Franklin argues that humans are “reasonable creatures” that are enable to create
Premium Reason Thought Human
Professor Michael Sandel discussed both “consequentialist moral reasoning” and “categorical moral reasoning” (Harvard University‚ n.d.). Sandel states that “categorical moral reasoning” is when you “locate morality in certain duties and rights” (Harvard University‚ n.d.). And “consequentialist moral reasoning” is when you “locate morality from consequences of your actions” (Harvard University‚ n.d.). Basically‚ “categorical moral reasoning” focuses on the “consequences”‚ after “action” is taken‚ before
Premium Immanuel Kant Philosophy Categorical imperative
Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland deals with a theme of madness and reasoning. Throughout the book Alice‚ the main character‚ is trying to be logical‚ as she solves the problems she encounters in Wonderland. One of the most notable and obvious examples of this is her struggle with the question‚ “who in the world am I” (Carroll‚ 18). She breaks down the problem into simple true statements‚ such as “I think I remember feeling different”‚ before allowing these facts to lead to their eventual conclusion
Premium Alice's Adventures in Wonderland Alice in Wonderland Lewis Carroll
inductive and informal reasoning in relation to discovering new information and facts‚ and if there is a need for discovering other ways of thinking in order to gain more knowledge about what we already know. Introduction: The question I have decided to answer is what are the importance between the strength and weaknesses of deductive‚ inductive and informal reasoning? Definitions: Deductive: a form of reasoning from the general to the particular Inductive: a form of reasoning from the particular
Premium Logic Reasoning Deductive reasoning
Cultural considerations in moral and ethical reasoning The sound development of moral reasoning and ethics is an integral part of the growth and maturation of a healthy and productive human being. Without morals and ethics‚ a person cannot exist within society’s boundaries and would be doomed to be forever barred from its hallowed walls for as long as that person did not conform to the societal norms of having the ability to morally reason and implement a set of ethics. But morals and ethics
Premium Morality Ethics
CASE BASED REASONING FOR CLASSIFICATION PROBLEM INTRODUCTION The Car Classify System is an intelligence system which applying Case Based Reasoning approach. This system was developing to classify the car class whether they are unacc‚ acc‚ good or very good (vgood). This system classified the car by calculate the similarities with the new data with the history data in the data base. The new data is data that key in by the user. The history data is the old data that get from the UCI Machine Learning
Premium Data
Hypothetical and Scientific Reasoning VS Superstition In a large measure‚ science and superstition are polar opposites. Science is based on evidentiary support‚ objectivity and integrity‚ whereas superstition has very few of these. This is despite the fact that science originally evolved from superstition and theology‚ for example astronomy evolved from faith‚ chemistry from alchemy‚ etc. These were thought to be superstitions initially and only through a series of hypotheses‚ research‚ and argumentations
Premium Scientific method Theory
is controlled by his “Id”. He lacks acceptance of his creation’s appearance suggesting that despite his use of dead body parts‚ Victor imagined his creation to be beautiful as he imagines himself to be beautiful. However‚ if Victor used logical reasoning he would understand the reality of his creation would be as horrifying and deformed as the idea of reanimating a dead body. Victor clearly cannot take the weight of his creation‚ “unable to endure the aspect of the being [he] had created‚ [he] rushed
Premium Frankenstein English-language films Mary Shelley