At 6:25 PM‚ S/O Tom Kollar had notified Security Supervisor Steven Gibbs that he had received a report about a vehicle on fire in the B building parking lot‚ as well as notifications from Safety Representative Jolynn Heller in regards to the issue. The Fire department was called by Supervisor Gibbs at 6:26 pm‚ who in turn notified him that they were sending a unit immediately to the site and called LPS Jeffrey Matweecha in regards on escalation for the incident. He advised coordinate with Safety
Premium Police Constable Supreme Court of the United States
In Dred Scott v. Sandford the case started in 1856 and ended in 1857. “The Supreme Court decided that Americans of African descent‚ whether free or slave‚ were not American citizens and could not sue in federal court. The Court also ruled that Congress lacked power to ban slavery in the U.S. territories. Finally‚ the Court declared that the rights of slaveowners were constitutionally protected by the Fifth Amendment because slaves were categorized as property.” - Alex McBride (McBride 2006‚ 411)
Premium United States American Civil War Slavery in the United States
Tyson Foods‚ Case No. 2-103 / 11-1186‚ is a prime example of an Iowa appellate court being relied upon to provide justice to each member of the case during a lawsuit filed against a corporation. Refugio Orozco Serratos (plaintiff) sued his employer Tyson Foods (defendant) because he believed the factory he worked in provided employees
Premium Crime Criminology Theft
Case Brief Summary: Marbury v. Madison Robert L. Broadwater PAD 525 Strayer University Dr. O’Neal July 09‚ 2012 Summary of Marbury v. Madison‚ 5 U.S. 137‚ 1 Cranch 137‚ 2 L. Ed. 60 (1803). Facts The incumbent president Federalist John Adams was defeat in the presidential election by Democratic-Republican Thomas Jefferson. The day before leaving office‚ President John Adams named forty-two justices of the peace and sixteen new circuit court justices for the District of Columbia. This was
Premium Supreme Court of the United States Marbury v. Madison United States Constitution
Week 2 DQ 1 Discuss the Stowers v. Wolodzko case questions. . The husband of the plaintiff file a petition to the court that his wife[plaintiff] is mentally ill and needs to have a court order directing the admission of her to the mental health hospital. The petition initiated by plaintiff’s husband is the order of the Wayne County probate court‚ and it is also appropriately certified by Doctors Wolodzko‚ who after appearing in her house and introducing himself as a doctor ‚ and have a conversation
Premium Psychiatric hospital Psychiatry Mental disorder
Anthony Allen Intro to writing 2 February 2‚ 2014 An Incident that made you Believe in Fate Honestly I have no idea where I might stand on this one‚ as I have had things happen‚ that needed to happen for many reasons‚ occur out of the blue and make enormous changes in my life. At the same time I am all for my own free will and making what I wish to happen a reality through hard work and smiles‚ but I can say that there is one incident that happened that made me realize that maybe our lives are
Premium
Roberta broker never stated which shares of stock was actually sold. Furthermore‚ Roberta oral instructions never specified which specific shares of stocks she wanted to be sold. In the relevant court case Helvering v. Rankin‚ 295 U.S. 123 (1935)‚ the court decided: "When shares of stock in a corporation are sold from lots purchased at different dates and at different prices‚ and the identity of the lots cannot be determined‚ the stock sold shall be charged
Premium Generally Accepted Accounting Principles Balance sheet Investment
government forms such as tax returns and immigration papers is considered an act of unauthorized practice of law. In The Florida Bar v. Furman‚ the Court stated that Ms. Furman went beyond just transposing information from an intake sheet to a form‚ she was explaining legal remedies‚ construing and interpreting legal effects‚ giving advice on how best
Premium Law Tax Taxation in the United States
Terry v. Ohio was a court decision made in 1968 that still affects how police conduct their operations to this day. This case gave special liberties to police officers which would otherwise be in conflict with the Fourth Amendment. The Fourth Amendment states " the right of the people to be secure in their persons‚ house‚ papers‚ and effects‚ against unreasonable searches and seizure‚ shall not be violated‚ and no Warrants shall issue‚ but upon probable cause‚ supported by Oath or affirmation‚ and
Premium Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution Supreme Court of the United States United States Constitution
someone’s home. Under the Fourth Amendment‚ people have the right to be secure in their homes (Hall‚ 2014). Therefore they are protected places and a warrant would be required to legally enter and make an arrest unless the officer could justify an exception (Hall‚ 2014). The Fourth Amendment also specifically states that an arrest warrant must be based on probable cause and supported by oath or affirmation (Hall‚ 2014). It further stipulates that people to be seized must be specifically addressed
Premium Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution Law Police