ARCHER V. WARNER (01-1418) 538 U.S. 314 (2003) 283 F.3d 230‚ reversed and remanded. NATURE OF CASE Leonard and Arlene Warner sold the Warner Manufacturing Company to Elliott and Carol Archer. The Archers sued the Warners in North Carolina state court for fraud in connection to the sale. The settlement was that the Warners would pay the Archers $300‚000. The Warners paid $200‚000 and executed a promissory note for $100‚000. The Warners failed to make payments on the promissory note and the
Premium Appeal United States Jury
Swan v. Talbot‚ Phelan v. Gardner‚ Marron v. Marron Case Briefs Jennifer Beverly PA205-02 Professor Byron Grim June 20‚ 2011 Case Briefs Citation: Swan v. Talbot‚ 152 Cal. 142 (Cal. 1907) Facts: George Swan‚ plaintiff‚ sold James R. Talbot‚ defendant‚ a portion of personal property. Swan was inebriated at the time the deal was prepared. The portion of the property sold to Talbot was valued at $21‚949.86. Talbot paid Swan $10‚604.32‚ this included $200 in coin that was paid to Swan
Premium Appeal
The case of Terry Schiavo is one of great controversy‚ in the sense that she perished due to euthanasia. For over ten years‚ Schiavo had been in a persistent vegetative state; in a legal campaign‚ her husband and parents disputed over whether Schiavo’s feeding tube should be restored‚ as it was removed from her due to her husband’s wishes (Euthanasia –Pro 1). The way Schiavo died was ethical‚ due to the fact that she had been in a persistent vegetative state with no possible way of recovering. Although
Premium Euthanasia Suicide Death
Optical Distortion‚ Inc. Case Analysis Mengyuan(Myra) Xu A20266661 2011-12-08 2011-12-05 MC 510 Optical Distortion‚ Inc. Case Meangyuan (Myra) Xu CONTENT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................................... 2 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................... 2 ANALYSIS ............................................
Premium Variable cost Marketing Costs
Case: R v. Hebert Facts of Case Judges: Dickson‚ Robert George Brian; Lamer‚ Antonio; Wilson‚ Bertha; La Forest‚ Gérard V.; L’Heureux-Dubé‚ Claire; Sopinka‚ John; Gonthier‚ Charles Doherty; Cory‚ Peter deCarteret; McLachlin‚ Beverley Neil Hebert was suspected of having robbed the Klondike Inn. After the police located Hebert‚ they placed him under arrest and informed him of his rights‚ and took him to the R.C.M.P detachment in Whitehorse. Hebert contacted counsel and obtained legal advice regarding
Premium Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms Police
Case: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission V. Abercrombie & Fitch Stores‚ Inc. Facts/Summary Abercrombie & Fitch Stores‚ Inc. (A&F) followed a ‘Look Policy’ administering the way its employees dressed in office. One of the policy explicitly says that caps must not be worn but however they did not define the term ‘cap’. The problem aroused when a practicing Muslim named Samantha Elauf‚ wore a headscarf due to her religious beliefs (Oyez‚ n.d.). One day‚ Elauf decided to apply at Abercrombie
Premium Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Supreme Court of the United States United States
Blue Nile Inc. in 2010: Case Study Zachary Williams Missouri Southern State University MM452-Strategic Management Dr. Moos February 23‚ 2015 Table of Contents Competitive Forces confronting Blue Nile and other online retail jewelers 3 Key Factors to a Company’s Success in the Market 4 Blue Nile’s Strategy
Premium Strategic management Customer service Sales
Company Bio Enager Industries Inc. is a young company whose growth was profound up to 1993 when it amassed sales over $222 Million. This company is comprised of three main divisions that are all considered to be independent from one another. The first and oldest division of the company is the Consumer Products Division which designs‚ manufactures‚ and markets a variety of kitchenware. The Industrial Products Division focuses its efforts on creating machinery that is uniquely and specifically designed
Premium Cash flow Investment Rate of return
INDEX CONTENTS Page No. Introduction 1 Issues Raised 1 Rules Applicable 5 Analysis 8 Conclusion 10 Bibliography 11 N. Nageshwar Rao & Co. v. State of A.P 1994 (6) SCC 205 Introduction India is a Union of States and is governed by a written constitution. Rights being immunities denote that there is a guarantee that certain things cannot or ought not to be done to a person against his will. According to this concept‚ human beings‚ by virtue of their humanity‚ ought to
Premium Constitution of India Law Government of India
Dye 04/03/2015 CJAD 405 MADDOX V. MONTGOMERY United States Courts of Appeals‚ Eleventh Circuit 718 F.2d 1033 (11th Cir. 1983) Facts: Jimmy Maddox was sentenced to serve a life of imprisonment after he was convicted in a Georgia State court for charges of rape. Maddox filed for a federal Habeas corpus petition after being unsuccessful at a direct appeal for his charges. His reason behind filing the federal habeas corpus was for the court violating the doctrine of Brady v. Maryland for alleging prosecutorial
Premium Supreme Court of the United States Habeas corpus Appeal