CONTRACTS OF INDEMNITY Definition Section 124 of the Contract Act defines a contract of indemnity as a contract by which one party promises to save the other party from loss caused to him by the conduct of the promisor himself‚ or by the conduct of any other person. P. contracts to indemnify Q against the consequences of any proceeding which R may. take against Q in respect of a certain sum of Rs. 200. This is a Contract of Indemnity: P is called the indemnifier and Q the Indemnity-holder. Characteristics
Premium Contract Debt Money
A valid contract consists of all essential components which present and the court will enforce as a legally binding promise . One of the elements contract to create a contract is agreement which included an offer and acceptance. “Acceptance is a final and unqualified assent to the terms of the offer‚ made in the manner specified or indicated by the offeror” . Acceptance may be express orally‚ in writing‚ occasionally‚ or even by implied from the offeree’s conduct. In communication of acceptance‚
Premium Contract Contract law Offer and acceptance
Employee Resourcing – The Psychological Contract How can we define the psychological contract? Is it the set of mutual obligations/expectations and more often than not aspirations between employer and employee that extend beyond the formal‚ written contract of employment? This is the general consensus with modern scholars and workers alike‚ but just how far is this assertion true? The problem is trying to evaluate what the psychological contract actually is and what it stands for in our
Free Employment
discuss. In Contracts‚ What is "Consideration"? In order for any contract to be enforceable‚ courts generally require three things: mutual assent (agreement to the contract terms)‚ a valid offer and acceptance‚ and consideration. Consideration in law is one of the three main building blocks of a contract. It can be anything of value‚ which each party to a legally binding contract must agree to exchange if the contract is to be valid. If only one party offers consideration in contract‚ the agreement
Premium Contract
Mistake in contract law‚ is a factual misunderstanding that may lead to a failure of a meeting of the minds. Unilateral mistake is mean that is only one party is mistaken‚ but the other party knows‚ or ought reasonably to be aware of the mistake. Contract may be void or voidable. Void is a contract that is no legal effect. While‚ voidable is an agreement that may be affirmed or rejected at the option of one of the party. The reason why Lord Denning took the view that these two cases could not be
Premium Contract Common law Arbitration
Metropolitan Trial Court‚ Municipal Trial Court Quasi Judicial Bodies 1. 1. Comelec 2. 2. NLRC 3. 3. LTFRC 4. 4. ERB Quantum of Evidence Criminal cases: Proof Beyond Reasonable Doubt Civil cases: Preponderance of Evidencegreater weight of all the evidence which as a whole shows that the act sought to be proved is more probable than not. Administrative cases: Substantial Evidence – Such evidence that a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion Effects and Applications of law
Premium Contract
1.Offer 1. Offer means a proposal by a person in which he makes his willingness to enter into a legally binding contract for some conside¬ration. 2. An offer is made with the object of getting consent of the offeree. 3. An offer can be accepted by the offeree. 4. An offer when accepted becomes an agreement. Invitation to Offer 1. An Invitation to offer means an intention of a person to invite others with a view to enter into an agreement. 2. An invitation to offer on the other hand is made
Premium Contract
Contract Law LA4001 In order to able to outline the contract law on capacity in the light of this statement basically means how does the contract is being issued to the lay people who has no or little knowledge about law and how does it seek to protect the interests of those making the contracts. Contracts are of course not only made between individual people. In many case one or both
Premium Contract Contract law
Contract With America In the historic 1994 midterm elections‚ Republicans won a majority in Congress for the first time in forty years‚ partly on the appeal of a platform called the Contract with America. Put forward by House Republicans‚ this sweeping ten-point plan promised to reshape government. Its main theme was the decentralization of federal authority‚ deregulation‚ tax cuts‚ reform of social programs‚ increased power for states‚ a balanced federal budget were its chief ambitions. With
Premium United States House of Representatives President of the United States Bill Clinton
CONTENTS 1. BACKGROUND: 1 2. CONTRACT: 1 2.1 VALID CONTRACT: 2 2.2 VOID CONTRACT: 2 2.3 VOIDABLE CONTRACT: 2 3. SALES CONTRACT: 3 3.1 SUBJECT MATTER (MAL): 3 3.2 CLASSIFICATION OF MAL: 4 3.3 CONDITIONS OF VALIDITY OF SALE: 4 3.4 PROHIBITED SALES: 7 3.5 KINDS OF SALE TRANSACTIONS: 10 3.5.1 BAY AL MUQAYADAH: 11 3.5.2 BAY AL MUTLAQ: 11 3.5.3 BAY AL SARF: 12 3.5.4 SALAM CONTRACT: 13 3.5.5 ISTISNA 16 3.5.6 MURABAHAH 19 3.5.7 BAY’AL-MUAJJAL 22 4
Premium Contract Muhammad Money