Court Decisions Sandra Shemick HSM 240 February 15‚ 2015 Erin Akins Court Decisions I chose Drug testing programs for welfare applicants. The reason I chose this is because I happen to agree with doing so. I disagree with the junction that the judge put in saying that it is “likely unconstitutional”. I feel this because I am a strong supporter in helping those who are in need‚ not those that are abusing the help. As a mother of two‚ and have been on state assistance for help‚ I often would see
Premium Drug addiction Michigan Bill Clinton
The landmark case of McCulloch v. Maryland in 1819 unanimously ruled that the Constitution allowed Congress to establish the National Bank. The Court also asserted that the Constitution did not allow a state to tax the Bank. Chief Justice John Marshall stated that the Constitution does not explicitly grant Congress the right to establish a national bank‚ but also noted that the "necessary and proper" clause of the Constitution gives Congress the authority to do that which they felt was best for the
Premium United States Constitution United States Congress Supreme Court of the United States
Federal Courts vs. State Courts Courts in the United States are made up and governed by the United States Constitution and then separated by Federal and State levels. Both levels are different in how they are made up‚ how they run and the laws they are in charge of enforcing. Federal: 1. United States Supreme Court; the highest appellate court in the Federal judicial system. This court is tasked with taking on its own cases and normally takes from lower courts that struggle with defining Federal
Premium United States United States Constitution Supreme Court of the United States
And in sixty-four years‚ several different races have had the opportunity to enroll and earn degrees from Louisiana State University‚ including myself. However‚ this was not always the case. There was a point in time where blacks and whites could not attend the same school‚ or even use the same facilities. The court decision that made separate facilities legal‚ was Plessy v Ferguson. It allowed for separate areas for blacks and whites‚ which forced blacks to create their facilities‚ like Historically
Premium Plessy v. Ferguson Black people African American
a Supreme Court case whereby the Court upheld the ultimate states’ authority to impose compulsory vaccination laws. It articulated that an individual’s freedom should at times be subjected to the states’ police power and subordinated to the collective public welfare. The Court decision in the case elicited numerous questions regarding the state government’s power to safeguard the public’s health‚ as well as the protection of personal liberty as enshrined in the Constitution. The Court also articulated
Premium
Issues and Decisions. One page send to me via e-mail as an attachement 1. Describe the common legal issue raised in the court case assigned. 2. Describe the legal basis for the court arriving at seemingly different outcomes. 3. Justify the differing outcomes as the correct outcome in the case on the basis of stare decisis (legal precedents). Goldberg V. Kelly court case is about the termination of welfare benefits to recipient without adequate notice. In 1970‚ the recipients claimed that
Premium Law United States Supreme Court of the United States
The US Court System The courts are the overseers of the law. They administer it‚ they resolve disputes under it‚ and they ensure that it is and remains equal to and impartial for everyone. In the United States each state is served by the separate court systems‚ state and federal. Both systems are organized into three basic lev- - els of courts — trial courts‚ intermediate courts of appeal and a high court‚ or Supreme Court. The state courts are concerned essentially with cases arising under state
Premium United States Law Appeal
discussed. Obergefell V. Hodges is the court case that talks about gay marriage. Many are against the topic‚ but maybe they should open their minds a little more and accept that love is love. Though many know of the court case‚ not all people know the history of it. The part that many know is that the people were gay‚ lesbian‚ and so on‚ and most people also know that they were fighting for the right to marry. What too many people do not know is that even though court Justices were against it‚ the majority
Premium Homosexuality Same-sex marriage Marriage
appointees whose commission was not delivered‚ requested legal order from the Supreme Court that Madison deliver his commission. 1. The legal issue(s) There are three primary legal issues. (1) Is Madison entitled to receive his commission? (2) Can the requested legal order be granted by US courts? (3) Does the Supreme Court have the right to issue the delivery
Premium United States Thomas Jefferson United States Constitution
Miller v. StateSupreme Court of Nevada‚ 1996991 P. 2d 1183People in the United States commit crimes and make up excuses why they should not be held accountable for a crime. Insanity and temporary Insanity have significant differences. One might ask themselves is there really any meaningful difference? During the history of our court system there has been many significant court decisions which address the controversy topics of insanity and temporary insanity as it relates to criminal procedures. One
Premium Insanity defense Law Mental disorder