Jury Nullification Paper Will Rosales CJA/344 April 30‚ 2014 Timothy Hall Jury Nullification Paper In our society‚ ethnicity does have major effects on our judicial practices and courtroom proceedings do to The Sentencing Project research. It has also affected several different places where we live. For example‚ Poverty stricken areas has more of a possibility to experience much more crime than a place that is more fruitful employment and has maintained wealth. The issues with both class and
Premium Race Law Jury
CIRCUIT 938 F.2d 1092; 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 14248 July 9‚ 1991‚ Filed SUBSEQUENT HISTORY: Writ of certiorari denied Prince v. United States‚ 502 U.S. 961‚ 112 S. Ct. 427‚ 116 L. Ed. 2d 447‚ 1991 U.S. LEXIS 6611 (1991) Post-conviction proceeding at‚ Motion denied by United States v. Prince‚ 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 17403 (10th Cir. Okla.‚ July 10‚ 2006) PRIOR HISTORY: [**1] On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma; D.C. No. CR-90-96-W; D.C
Premium Supreme Court of the United States United States
Deterrence is one of the primary goals in the criminal justice system and it is described as special or specific deterrence and general deterrence. The purpose of special/specific deterrence is to instill fear on the offender so that they will not commit future crime. General deterrence is based on punishing offenders to instill fear in society‚ otherwise known as teaching society a lesson and showing the consequences of committing crime. Punishment has always been imposed based on the idea that
Free Crime Criminal law Prison
district court felony trial and a justice court misdemeanor DUI. These two courts were very different from start to finish from the atmosphere‚ length of the case‚ and how the lawyers acted. Stepping into each of these courtrooms was like stepping into two different worlds. While the proceedings may have been similar‚ the environments were completely opposite. The first court I attended was a district court case that was supposed to be a jury trial. The presiding judge was Vernice Trease. The defendant
Premium Felony Lawyer Prosecutor
Business Law 115 Superior Court Observation The Superior Court session I observed was an alcohol impairment case. The defendant in this case‚ had been found guilty in District Court‚ but had filed an appeal to the District Court’s decision. The morning began with the juryselection process. The potential juror pool began with approximately 30 people. The Clerk of Court‚ Wendy Williams‚drew twelve names at random form a bowl to begin the selection process. Once the initial twelve names were
Premium Jury Judge
Walking up the large pathway and breathing in the cold morning air was exhilarating. It was overwhelming entering the enormous Supreme Court building. Upon entering the courtroom‚ you see rows among rows of wooden benches all facing the judges. There is a short quarter wall separating the rows of benches and the judges.in the space between the gate and the judges there is two tables for the defendants and their lawers along
Premium Family Mother Parent
wrestled with four areas: 1. Right to counsel in nonfelony prosecutions 2. Stages of the criminal process 3. Ineffective assistance of counsel 4. Self-representation II. Discuss How the Courtroom Work Group Affects How Defense Attorneys Represent Their Clients A. Lawyers who work within the parameters of the courtroom work group receive benefits for their clients‚ including more case information from prosecutors and perhaps better plea bargains. Lawyers who are less cooperative find that they do not
Premium Lawyer
The Salem Witch Trials and the 6th Amendment History 115 Thomas Richards April 11‚ 2012 A little 9-year-old girl named Betty and her older cousin giggle as they hurry home. It ’s getting late and it looks like it might snow. They whisper back and forth about what they have recently learned. The local fortuneteller had just informed them of the trade in which their future husbands would be employed. But they must hurry back before someone notices their absence‚ or
Premium Salem witch trials
only fits the primary section of this definition‚ as it can only be obtained from personal testimony‚ one of the most unreliable forms of court evidence; it is also only visible to the individual testifying and can be easily acted out as if the courtroom was a playhouse.Spectral evidence was first introduced and admitted
Premium Evidence law Critical thinking Evidence
The most familiar model is the adversarial model. This is also called the combat model. “In this model‚ the prosecutor and defense attorney ‘fight it out’ by vigorously contesting the evidence before a judge acting as a neutral referee over the proceedings” (Steven Barkan‚ Law and Society: An Introduction‚ 279-280. Pearson Education‚ Inc. 2009). In most cases‚ a consensual model is used. This can be done by a good deal of cooperation with the prosecution and the defense. “Fighting it out” is a way
Free Criminal law Law Jury