Deterrence is one of the primary goals in the criminal justice system and it is described as special or specific deterrence and general deterrence. The purpose of special/specific deterrence is to instill fear on the offender so that they will not commit future crime. General deterrence is based on punishing offenders to instill fear in society‚ otherwise known as teaching society a lesson and showing the consequences of committing crime. Punishment has always been imposed based on the idea that
Free Crime Criminal law Prison
district court felony trial and a justice court misdemeanor DUI. These two courts were very different from start to finish from the atmosphere‚ length of the case‚ and how the lawyers acted. Stepping into each of these courtrooms was like stepping into two different worlds. While the proceedings may have been similar‚ the environments were completely opposite. The first court I attended was a district court case that was supposed to be a jury trial. The presiding judge was Vernice Trease. The defendant
Premium Felony Lawyer Prosecutor
Business Law 115 Superior Court Observation The Superior Court session I observed was an alcohol impairment case. The defendant in this case‚ had been found guilty in District Court‚ but had filed an appeal to the District Court’s decision. The morning began with the juryselection process. The potential juror pool began with approximately 30 people. The Clerk of Court‚ Wendy Williams‚drew twelve names at random form a bowl to begin the selection process. Once the initial twelve names were
Premium Jury Judge
Walking up the large pathway and breathing in the cold morning air was exhilarating. It was overwhelming entering the enormous Supreme Court building. Upon entering the courtroom‚ you see rows among rows of wooden benches all facing the judges. There is a short quarter wall separating the rows of benches and the judges.in the space between the gate and the judges there is two tables for the defendants and their lawers along
Premium Family Mother Parent
The Salem Witch Trials and the 6th Amendment History 115 Thomas Richards April 11‚ 2012 A little 9-year-old girl named Betty and her older cousin giggle as they hurry home. It ’s getting late and it looks like it might snow. They whisper back and forth about what they have recently learned. The local fortuneteller had just informed them of the trade in which their future husbands would be employed. But they must hurry back before someone notices their absence‚ or
Premium Salem witch trials
wrestled with four areas: 1. Right to counsel in nonfelony prosecutions 2. Stages of the criminal process 3. Ineffective assistance of counsel 4. Self-representation II. Discuss How the Courtroom Work Group Affects How Defense Attorneys Represent Their Clients A. Lawyers who work within the parameters of the courtroom work group receive benefits for their clients‚ including more case information from prosecutors and perhaps better plea bargains. Lawyers who are less cooperative find that they do not
Premium Lawyer
only fits the primary section of this definition‚ as it can only be obtained from personal testimony‚ one of the most unreliable forms of court evidence; it is also only visible to the individual testifying and can be easily acted out as if the courtroom was a playhouse.Spectral evidence was first introduced and admitted
Premium Evidence law Critical thinking Evidence
The most familiar model is the adversarial model. This is also called the combat model. “In this model‚ the prosecutor and defense attorney ‘fight it out’ by vigorously contesting the evidence before a judge acting as a neutral referee over the proceedings” (Steven Barkan‚ Law and Society: An Introduction‚ 279-280. Pearson Education‚ Inc. 2009). In most cases‚ a consensual model is used. This can be done by a good deal of cooperation with the prosecution and the defense. “Fighting it out” is a way
Free Criminal law Law Jury
the ideology (the painting)‚ Shot B physically positions our view from that ideology. Whether that ideology is indifference or fatalism‚ the cut still puts the audience in the balcony of a balcony-less room to look down in judgment of the unfair proceeding. The painting is both frame and window and throughout the short trial the audience is subjected to its gaze. The mood is unnerving and hopeless as the dark painting‚ with all it’s ideological weight‚ looks down on the audience in judgment of their
Premium Film Film director Narrative
Opening Statement May it please the court. It was a peaceful Saturday morning in April. Just last spring. In Shamrock University Law School ’s classroom building. Our hallways were quiet and our classrooms were almost empty. And then‚ in a student courtroom‚ something happened that astonished everyone. The plaintiff‚ Judge John Birdsong‚ pointed a .357 magnum pistol near his leg‚ pulled the trigger‚ not once‚ but‚ twice‚ to see if the gun was loaded‚ and shot himself in the left leg. He now comes before
Premium Law Gun Lawyer