Phillip Zimbardo’s Stanford Prison Experiment: Ethical or not? Chase Clark University of Massachusetts‚ Lowell Abstract The research conducted in this paper consists of solely the Stanford Prison Experiment‚ which was originally conducted by the social psychologist‚ Phillip G. Zimbardo. This experiment replicated a real prison that took students to participate in it. Students role-played the prisoners themselves‚ and prison guards. It was conducted in the basement of the psychology department
Premium Stanford prison experiment
Stanford Prison Experiment P R E S E N T E D B Y: J O N AT H A N‚ V I N E E T H ‚ J A K E ‚ R O H I T The Purpose? Psychological effects of becoming a prisoner or a prison guard How would being placed in a position of power or weakness affect one’s actions and mental state? Who Was In Charge? A team of researchers led by Professor Phillip Zimbardo conducted the experiment at Stanford University on students Subjects Involved 24 male students were prison guards and prisoners in a mock
Premium Stanford prison experiment
research experiment to study how people conformed to the roles they are given. The experiment was set up in the basement of Stanford Psychology building. Zimbardo’s goal was‚ “... to understand more about the process by which people called “prisoners” lose their liberty‚ civil rights‚ independence‚ and privacy‚ while those called “guards” gain social power by accepting the responsibility for controlling and managing the lives of their dependent charges” (Zimbardo par. 11). Although the experiment was
Premium Stanford prison experiment
Summary The Stanford Prison was an experiment to study the psychological effects and reactions of students pretending to be prisoners and guards. This study was conducted in 1971 and although it was suppose to have duration of 2 weeks‚ it finished after just 6 days. The experiment required 24 male students for the role-play and paid $15‚00 per day. Several volunteers answered to an ad on a newspaper and were selected after being interviewed. They were all healthy and there were no psychological
Premium Stanford prison experiment Psychology Human behavior
issues today. The Stanford Prison Experiment‚ conducted over 40 years ago‚ brought these ethical issues into the limelight and remains one of the most controversial studies in the history of studying human behavior. This paper aims to define ethics‚ describe risk/benefit ratio‚ provide a brief background on the Stanford Prison Experiment‚ and evaluate the impact it has had on psychological research. The Stanford Prison Experiment The Stanford Prison Experiment probably tops a lot of lists when
Premium Stanford prison experiment Psychology
Pipe Flow Experiment Purpose The purpose of the experiment is providing an opportunity to students of experience to familiarize with some key aspects of fluid flow in pipe‚ notably friction losses and verify theory. In this experiment‚ required equipment are a water tank‚ piezometric tubes‚ pump‚ a stop watch‚ empty bucket and a digital weight scale. By operating the pump to keep the water is full in the water
Premium Fluid dynamics Plumbing Liquid
of doctors and scientist thinking that they were being taken care of. The men participated in an experiment called the Tuskegee syphilis Experiment were the men would partake in a medical study. This paper will examine how scientist took advantage of the men who participated in this experiment and neglected to tell them the truth. This topic really interest me because it took 40 years into the experiment to see that it was not scientific but a real case of cruelty to innocent men. So how is it that
Premium African American Black people Race
Jacob Stewart Dr. Wells English 101 20 September 2013 In the 1950’s‚ a series of experiments were performed by psychologist Solomon Asch on the effects peer pressure can have on someone that would otherwise be stalwart in their judgment. In the experiment‚ a group of young men were shown a line with three other lines of various lengths next to it‚ and asked to determine which of three lines matched the length of the first line. There was‚ however‚ a catch: all but one of the men were
Premium Asch conformity experiments Conformity Peer pressure
emotionally and physically involved. Secondly he denied Richard Yacco the ability to leave. Whenever one conducts an experiment‚ all who are involved should have the right to end their involvement at anytime. Finally there was no proper debriefing‚ as well as it was argued that many left in a worse mental state then prior to the experiment. Now some may not be bothered by such an experiment in fact‚ we have seen other controversial studies such as Mailgrams’ study‚ where he was studying the conflict between
Premium Stanford prison experiment
Before the experiment the participants should be aware of few things such as; what would be expected‚ the risks‚ the overall purpose and the entitlement. Stanley Milgram had advertised his experiment on a newspaper to get their attention as to needing male participants. From here‚ being informed that there will be two males as one would be a teacher and one would be a learner – even though there would be confederate. The participant would not necessarily be told everything about the experiment as this
Premium Ethics Psychology Stanford prison experiment