sculptures of David from Michelangelo and Gian Lorenzo Bernini. The similarities and differences are listed below: Similarities: 1). Both sculptures represent the same popular subject matter who is the biblical David during the battle with Goliath. 2). Both sculptures use marble as the material. 3). Both sculptures show the strength‚ confidence‚ beauty and concentration in the hero David during a combat. Differences: 1). Michelangelo’s David is completed by 1504 and Bernini’s David is completed
Free Gian Lorenzo Bernini
What importance does Hume place on the notions of coherence and constancy? How do they fit into his overall argument? As a means of fully understanding the argument brought forward by Hume’s‚ one must understand certain key words used. According to Merriam Webster dictionary online coherence can be defined as “logically or aesthetically ordered or integrated‚ having clarity or intelligibility‚ having the quality of holding together”; and constancy is “the quality of staying the same : lack of change
Premium Mind Philosophy Metaphysics
The first difference that is easily distinguished between Michelangelo’s and Bernini’s David is the movement or the moment they represent. Michelangelo had chose to represent the moment before the commencement of the contest whereas Bernini chose the dynamic split second when David is launching the stone from his sling right before the death of Goliath. In Michelangelo’s version‚ David looks balanced. We automatically look at this piece from top to the bottom. There is a sense of perfect harmony
Premium Florence Italy Renaissance
Hume ’s view of what constitutes personal identity rests heavily upon his preceding theories concerning the nature of ideas and causation. The most important preceding ideas to take into account are the rejection of causality and necessary connection and his strict empiric stance on the basis of knowledge and the only two types of perception being ideas that are reliant on initial impressions. There will clearly be difficulty in defining and explaining ’the self ’ when both the notions of causality
Premium Perception Mind Philosophy of perception
Locke and Hobbes disagree almost entirely on everything. I would say that Locke thinks of human nature as essentially good while Hobbes views it as essentially evil. Furthermore‚ for Hobbes people leave a state of nature for security‚ as they are driven by year. For Locke‚ however‚ the driving force is possessions and material wealth: we will live better if we form a society instead of living separately in a state of nature. I think their philosophy is different because of they background and also
Premium Political philosophy United States Thomas Hobbes
Compare and Contrast the Philosophies of John Locke‚ Thomas Hobbes‚ and Karl Marx In the idea of human nature; origin of state‚ the nature of government‚ the rights of regulation can be drawn as the reflection of insightful philosophies of John Locke‚ Thomas Hobbes and Karl Marx. By understanding this within the context of human nature‚ we can see their ideas play to how they perceive a modern philosophy. Karl Marx’s Communist Manifesto illustrates the desire to build "a society without economic
Premium Immanuel Kant Sociology Philosophy
different paths‚ the Italian Renaissance and the Northern Renaissance. Two famous figures of these Renaissances were Machiavelli and Thomas More. Niccolò di Bernardo dei Machiavelli was known as “the father of modern political theory”‚ he was born in Florence. He was a politician‚ historian‚ philosopher‚ humanist and a writer. He was part of the Italian Renaissance. Thomas More was an English lawyer‚ social philosopher‚ author‚ statesman and a renaissance humanist. He was also
Premium Renaissance Italy Middle Ages
Thomas Hobbes is as a pessimist who had major governmental upheaval during his time. This social unrest is what shaped his view of the balance between personal liberty and security. He believes that societies are in need of a strong rule‚ whether it be a monarch‚ dictator or oligarchy‚ but that humans are rational in their ideas and can comprehend a “Social Contract.” People are rational and clear about their interest and are able to govern themselves. At the same time‚ these people are bad and
Premium
Thereupon‚ Hume made the suggestion that we as humans have the ability to possess knowledge of the “matters of fact” concerning objects that we have never seen or experienced before through a process which we have known as “cause and effect”. My knowledge that my friend is in France might have been caused by a letter to that effect‚ and my knowledge that the sun will rise tomorrow is inferred from past experience‚ which tells me that the sun has risen every day in the past.Hume then asks how we know
Premium David Hume Metaphysics Philosophy
For throughout the centuries‚ scholars have addressed whether information exists and on the off chance that we know anything at all thinkers characterize learning as a conviction which is in concurrence with the actualities we can know are those which are testable and that learning must be gathered by a solid means‚ for example‚ science. Something else‚ our "insight" is simply conviction. While it appeared glaringly evident to me that the wellspring of learning was nature or the universe‚ I have
Premium Learning Educational psychology Psychology