1. This case goes back to the year the 2005. Value Trust was an $11.2 billion mutual fund in the middle of that year and had outperformed for the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index for 14 consecutive years. The fund was managed by William H. Miller III. During those 14 years‚ the fund experienced an average annual return of 14.6%. This return outperformed the S & P 500 by 3.67% per year. Morningstar claimed the Value Trust mutual fund fell behind the S & P 500 in 32 12-month periods
Premium Investment
12 March 2013 ProQuest 1. A fit model of leadership and two empirical examinations............................................................................ 1 .......................................................................................................................................................................... 3 12 March 2013 ii ProQuest 1 1 A fit model of leadership and two empirical examinations : Sweet‚ Kenneth Michael‚ Jr.. : University of Houston
Premium Leadership Scientific method
Evidence should be collected according to procedures that meet all applicable laws and regulations that have been developed from previous discussions with legal staff and appropriate law enforcement agencies‚ so that any evidence can be acceptable in court [10]. 1. Legal investigation 2. Digital forensic support 3. Get system photos after the incident has occurred 4. Report on date and time of the incident A. Phase 5: Containment and Eradication An incident should have a different containment and
Premium Computer Computer security Computer virus
HEARSAY EVIDENCE AND ITS ADMISSIBILITY CONTENTS 1. Introduction 2. Hearsay Evidence in different countries 3. Hearsay Evidence in different countries 4. ’Hearsay ’ Evidence : The Law 5. Hearsay Evidence Inadmissible 6. Hearsay Evidence: The concept Understood 7. Case Laws 8. Bibliography INTRODUCTION Hearsay is information gathered by one person from another person concerning some event‚ condition‚ or thing of which the first person had no direct experience
Premium Evidence law
his work in epistemology. In his work‚ “Can Empirical Knowledge Have a Foundation‚” he argues against foundationalism by and ultimately concludes that “strong foundationalism is untenable as a solution to the regress problem” (6). He explores externalism‚ a view that holds that rational explanations are found through observing objective features that exist in the world; as well as givenism‚ the view that one can understand facts without having evidence or beliefs regarding those facts. In this paper
Premium Epistemology Philosophy Scientific method
Implementation of Evidence Based Practice Rosemary Garcia Implementation of Evidence Based Practice Evidence Based Practice Nursing is the utilization by nurses of Evidence Based Research findings that‚ according to Houser (2012)‚ steer the nurse toward integration of clinical expert opinion and experience with an unbiased exhaustive review of the best scientific evidence professional nursing care literature can provide while incorporating patient values and preferences. Evidence Based Practice
Premium Nursing Scientific method Evidence-based medicine
Ethics of Belief. Clifford argues that it is always wrong to believe on insufficient evidence. He brings up a couple of premises. Premise 1 is that believing anything on insufficient evidence is always harmful to others. Premise 2 is that it is always wrong for anyone to believe anything on insufficient evidence. With the example of a shipowner‚ the shipowner believed strongly in his ship without sufficient evidence that it was ready for a voyage. However‚ because the ship sank and caused the death
Premium Logic Philosophy Epistemology
Collecting evidence is an essential factor to the world of criminology. The evidence can determine whether the person is guilty or not guilty. The matter of handling evidence correctly becomes a priority to anyone who is working in the case. Throughout the years civil and criminal cases have impacted our world. They have determine whether the suspects of cases and have narrowed down to the offender. But the process that it takes to establish a final conclusion to present to a court is a long
Premium O. J. Simpson murder case Sex offender Criminal law
Carla Belisario Criminal Evidence 09/15/12 Defending the client and making sure that this case is dismissed would be a great outcome to this case. However‚ in order to do this we must make sure that the evidence does not enter the court room. The first point that we will acknowledge in this case is that in order for the evidence to not be admitted into court is by filing a “Motion to Suppress” the evidence presented by the prosecution. A motion to suppress is a motion that is usually filed on
Premium Jury Law Judge
1. Relevant evidence is that which has the tendency to make a material issue more or less probable when presented before the court. The general rule for the admissibility of relevant evidence is Federal Rule of Evidence 402‚ which states that relevant evidence is admissible unless any of the following says otherwise: US Constitution‚ federal statutes‚ Federal Rules of Evidence‚ or any other rules set by the Supreme Court. The judge is the one makes the decision on if the evidence offered is relevant
Premium Crime Law Supreme Court of the United States