1. What did Arthur Anderson contribute to the Enron disaster? Arthur Andersen (AA) contributed to the Enron disaster when AA consulting became its own separate entity‚ named Accenture. Revenues from consulting services surpassed revenue from auditing services. A natural competitiveness grew between the two rivals and this is where the problems began to start. Management held maximinizing revenues as their primary focus of success and promotions/bonuses were based on this factor. The CEO of AA‚ Joe
Premium Enron Auditing Arthur Andersen
CASE#1 ENRON CORPORATION 1. Different parties were responsible for the occurrence of Enron crisis. Listed below are some of the parties who were responsible for the Enron fraud. a. The Enron Management: There is no doubt that the Enron management staged the fraud. The management was responsible for the misrepresentation of financial statement/ documents and wrong accounting practice. In Early 2002‚ their abusive accounting and financial reporting practices surfaced. Moreover‚ the management influenced
Premium Audit Enron Auditing
in the real auditing procedure. Bankers since they were supposed to be able to find the fraud in their clients’ financial statements when other parties traded those securities with Enron. 2. Anderson’s auditors provided these prohibit services to their public company client Enron: offering consulting service to Enron about their daily accounting decisions and operations which states as “bookkeeping or other services related to the accounting records or financial statements of the audit client” in
Premium Audit Internal control Enron
inappropriate accounting practices. Enron‚ WorldCom‚ Tyco‚ HealthSouth and Adelphia were selected for analysis because of the availability of information regarding specific events occured before‚ during and after the fraud period as well as the ethical issues involved . There is abundant literature presented on the Enron and WorldCom scandal. Tyco‚ Adelphia‚ and HealthSouth were selected to expand and support the information available in the WorldCom and Enron cases. Throughout the research process
Premium Enron Accounting scandals Fraud
5/9/2012 Angelia Hunter Impacts of Unethical Behavior The collapse of Enron in 2001 shed the light on a number of unethical business and accounting practices in the corporate world. In 1986 Enron CEO Kenneth Lay combined his Houston Natural Gas company with several other companies. At this time the company began growing exponentially. By the mid-1990’s the deregulation of the oil and gas industries allowed Enron to spend heavily and purchase companies as well as serving as a major supplier
Premium Kenneth Lay Enron Jeffrey Skilling
auditing for both public and privately held companies followed the AICPA ’s standards of the 10 generally accepted auditing standards. In the years 2000-2002‚ there had been an increased of major corporate accounting scandals. Large corporations such as Enron and WorldCom went into bankruptcy by trying to cover up their losses and debt. In response to the all the fraud‚ the US government passed the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act created the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board‚ or PCAOB
Premium Audit Enron Auditing
passed by Congress in response to the Enron and WorldCom financial scandals. The primary purpose of SOX is to protect shareholders from errors or fraudulent reporting by the company they have invested in. The Sarbanes-Oxley act is enforced by the Securities and Exchange Commission‚ a department dedicated to ensuring compliance to SOX from all firms‚ and is also responsible for revising provisions of the act in order to keep it current and up to date. The Enron financial scandal showed the public and
Premium Enron Accounting scandals
International Oil and Gas Management MODULE: Code CP 52060 Name: Leadership and Decision Making TITLE OF THE RESEARCH PAPER: 12 Angry Men and Enron Analysis. ABSTRACT: This research paper briefly analysis the movie clips of 12 Angry Men‚ an American drama film and Enron Corporation an American energy and Commodity Company. Implementing the theories of leadership and decision making a brief conclusion is derived. Major theories analysed are selective
Premium Cognition Enron
behind corporate governance 1. Agency problem 2. Stewardship theory 3. Resource dependency theory 4. Stakeholder theory 5. Political theory 6. Transaction cost economics 7. Ethical theory C. Principles of corporate governance D. SOX Act‚ E. Enron Scandal‚ Conclusion I. Introduction: The concept of corporate governance in legal and economic terms is equivalent to “the defense of shareholders”. Corporate governance is the response to typical agency problems between investors and managers
Premium Financial statements Corporate governance Enron
CASE STUDY. my personal point of view.. 3. IF ALL PUBLICLY TRADED FIRMS ARE OPERATING WITHIN THE SAME BASIC CORPORATE GOVERNANCE SYSTEM AS "ENRON"‚ WHY WOULD SOME PEOPLE BELIEVE THIS WAS AN ISOLATED INCIDENT‚ AND NOT AN EXAMPLE OF MANY FAILURES TO COME? The answer to this question lies within the minds of the Enron Managers rather than with the business environment. Most likely‚ these managers are well-educated and may have come from rich families. If this is so‚ then the logical thing
Premium Thought Mind Psychology