qm Session XII Assignment November 2‚ 2006 Chapters 12‚ 13‚ 14‚ 15 1. Briefly describe the difference between sequential engineering and quality by design (or concurrent engineering). Sequential engineering‚ as the name suggests‚ was completed in a sequential manner. Each step in the process was completed independent of the other steps and production is passed down the line with the preceding step unaware and unconcerned with problems that may arise. Quality by design or concurrent
Premium Failure mode and effects analysis Failure Product management
cocoon percentage (DCP)‚ shell ratio percentage (SR)‚ cocoon quality index (CQI)‚ and grades are tabulated for further analysis. Total Quality Managmenet ( TQM ) tools viz.‚ pareto chart‚ Cause and effect analysis and Failure Modes Effect Analysis ( FMEA ) were used based on the data collected from the testing of raw materials (Cocoon). The Study revealed that most of the farmers were unaware of the causes of the melted and irregular cocoons. The study recommend the need for appropriate training for
Premium Silk Failure mode and effects analysis
analyze future risk and if its with a team or individual he can manage it. 14. Is the FMEA table more valuable than the risk matrix? Why (not)? Ans: FMEA is quantitative analysis where as risk matrix is qualitative analysis. It is more precise and accurate if data are available. FMEA is more rigorous and it includes an additional factor i.e decision analysis using expected monetary values and simulation. FMEA you calculate risk priority number using severity‚ failure likelihood and detection of
Premium Project management
Running head: RTT1 TASK 2 RTT1 Task 2 Angela Kroemer Western Governors University Organizational Systems and Quality Leadership RTT1 Task 2 A. Complete a root cause analysis that takes into consideration causative factors that led to the sentinel event. (This patient’s outcome) The terms failure analysis‚ incident investigation‚ and root cause analysis are used by organizations when referring to their problem solving approach. Regardless of what it’s called there are three basic questions
Premium Nursing Health care Patient
Lean Six Sigma Operational - Delegate Workbook Mistake Proofing Techniques 2 Learning Objectives At the end of this section delegates will be able to: • Explain the role of Mistake Proofing within Lean Six Sigma • Recognise that defects can be eliminated (100% of the time) • Understand that Mistake Proofing should be focused on process steps that rely on operator vigilance and concentration • Recognise that simple‚ low cost devices can be the most effective solutions • Use a simple
Premium Failure mode and effects analysis Lean manufacturing Six Sigma
Quality Function Deployment‚ Productivity Press‚ Cambridge MA. Becker Associates Inc.‚ http://www.becker-associates.com/thehouse.HTM and 2. ISMP Medication Safety Alert newsletters October 17‚ 2001: http://www.becker-associates.com/qfdwhatis.htm 3. FMEA Diagram: Copyright©2004 Institute for Healthcare Improvement http://medqi.bsd.uchicago.edu/documents/FailureModesandEffectsAnalysis_FMEA_1.pdf 4. Operations management by David Barnes.
Premium Operations management Failure mode and effects analysis Management
TOOLS AND TECHNIQUES FOR QUALITY MANAGEMENT 9 Quality functions development (QFD) – Benefits‚ Voice of customer‚ information organization‚ House of quality (HOQ)‚ building a HOQ‚ QFD process. Failure mode effect analysis (FMEA) – requirements of reliability‚ failure rate‚ FMEA stages‚ design‚ process and documentation. Seven old (statistical) tools. Seven new management tools. Bench marking and POKA YOKE. UNIT V QUALITY SYSTEMS ORGANIZING AND IMPLEMENTATION 9 Introduction to IS/ISO 9004:2000
Premium Management Quality Process management
IV TOOLS AND TECHNIQUES FOR QUALITY MANAGEMENT Quality functions development (QFD) – Benefits‚ Voice of customer‚ information organization‚ House of quality (HOQ)‚ building a HOQ‚ QFD process. Failure mode effect analysis (FMEA) – requirements of reliability‚ failure rate‚ FMEA stages‚ design‚ process and documentation. Seven old (statistical) tools. Seven new management tools. Bench marking and POKA YOKE. UNIT V QUALITY SYSTEMS ORGANIZING AND IMPLEMENTATION Introduction to IS/ISO 9004:2000
Premium Management Process management Business process reengineering
nokia crisis management Paper no. XXXVII PROJECT REPORT ON CRISIS MANAGEMENT : nokia AN ELUCIDATION Under the guidance of: Mr. Atul Gupta (Lecturer) Hindu College‚ Delhi University Compiled by: Komal Grover B.Com (h) II year Roll No: - 608 Hindu College Year: - 2007-2010 PRELUDE A crisis is a major‚ unpredictable event that threatens to harm an organization and its stakeholders. Although crisis events are unpredictable‚ they are not unexpected. The
Premium Crisis management
Conference‚ San Antonio‚ TX‚ 2005. [7] J. Moubray‚ Reliability-centered Maintenance‚ 2nd Ed‚ Industrial Press Inc.‚ New York‚ 1997. [8] A.M. Smith‚ PE‚ Reliability-Centered Maintenance‚ 1st Ed‚ McGraw-Hill‚ Texas‚ 1992. [9] Failure Mode Effects Analysis (FMEA)‚ American Society for Quality‚ Milwaukee‚ WI‚ 2004. [Online]. Available:http://asq.org/learn-about-quality/process-analysis-tools/overview/fmea.html [10] The City of Milwaukee’s Sample Preventative Maintenance Manual for Electronically Monitored Boilers
Premium Furnace Failure mode and effects analysis Combustion