through Sara Lee’s business portfolio‚ there were multiple options for different industries that were attractive. The industries that stood out as the best opportunities were the retail industry‚ the food-service industry‚ and the beverage industries. All of these would be viable options for Sara Lee Corp to pursue. One thing that Sara Lee has on their side is the fact that they have already created a brand image in North America that represents quality products and services. Although Sara Lee is known
Premium Brand Brand management Trademark
Synopsis As Sara Lee Corporation’s CEO announced a multiyear strategic plan to transform the company into a leaner and more tightly focused food & beverage company‚ the central component of the company’s corporate restructuring plan was the divestiture of weak-performing business units and product categories accounting for $7.2 billion in sales (37% of Sara Lee’s sales). By divesting the company of poorly performing business units‚ and retrenching to a narrower diversification‚ Barnes envisioned
Premium
with an annual operating profit of 6 to 8%. In addition to this the company has also decreased expenditures by reducing labor costs by consolidating the company’s manufacturing facilities‚ and phasing out excess costs‚ and diverting the resources elsewhere. The company also benefits from a very tight value chain due to the majority (79%) of its products being wholly produced within company owned facilities. Hanes also has a very extensive research and development team. This allows them to continually
Premium Marketing Customer service Sales
In Malaysia‚ Giant will step into the age of 66 in year 2010; they are pioneer in the concept of modern supermarket shopping and has been ranked 11th of Most Valuable Brand in year 2007 and 12th in 2008‚ they also rewarded as the Top Retailer in Malaysia and Best of the Best in Asia Pacific Retailer’s Award for 2 consecutive years in 2007 and 2008. They also succeed in the Best Brands in Consumer (Hypermarkets)‚ Brand Laureate Award 2007/208 for Corporate Branding and also the Excellence Service
Premium Porter generic strategies Hypermarket Strategic management
Marketing Strategies in the Competition between Branded and Generic Antibiotics (A) Clamoxyl in 1996 02/2007-5057 This case was prepared by Pierre Chandon‚ Assistant Professor of Marketing at INSEAD‚ Olivier Kovarski‚ Professor of Marketing at ESC Normandie‚ Jacques Lendrevie‚ Professor of Marketing at HEC‚ Sarah Spargo‚ Research Associate at INSEAD‚ and Marc Vanhuele‚ Associate Professor of Marketing at HEC‚ as the basis for class discussion rather than to illustrate either effective
Premium Generic drug Pharmaceutical industry Antibiotic resistance
of Michael Porter’s Generic Strategies in the Romanian Hotel Industry Ovidiu N. Bordean‚ Anca I. Borza‚ Răzvan L. Nistor and Cătălina S. Mitra‚ Abstract— Porter’s generic strategies remain one of the most widely accepted typology of strategic options for businesses. Using a survey a sample of 69 hotel managers from the Nord-West part of Romania was questioned about their current strategic practices. A factor analysis revealed that hotels are pursuing only two strategies that can be identified
Premium Balance sheet Management Investment
Michael Porter’s Generic Strategies According to Porter‚ strategies allow organizations to gain competitive advantage from three different bases: cost leadership‚ differentiation and focus. Porter calls these bases as generic strategies. Cost leadership emphasizes producing standardized products at a very low per unit cost for consumers who are price sensitive. Differentiation is a strategy aimed at producing products and services considered unique industry wide and directed at customers who are
Premium Porter generic strategies
Porter’s generic strategies framework constitutes a major contribution to the development of the strategic management literature. Generic strategies were first presented in two books by Professor Michael Porter of the Harvard Business School (Porter‚ 1980‚ 1985). Porter (1980‚ 1985) suggested that some of the most basic choices faced by companies are essentially the scope of the markets that the company would serve and how the company would compete in the selected markets. Competitive strategies focus
Premium Strategic management Porter generic strategies Michael Porter
weaknesses and what is‚ or has the potential to be‚ it’s competitive advantage. Michael Porter‚ believed that the basis for this advantage falls under 3 base strategies of Cost leadership‚ Differentiation and Focus. With the use of his generic strategy model‚ a firm‚ understanding where its competitive advantage lies‚ can then formulate and implement an effective business strategy geared towards the sustainability of this advantage. The 3 bases‚ formed 5 generic strategies : Cost Leadership‚ strongly
Premium Strategic management
The Five Generic Competitive Strategies By Jennifer Williams There are five generic business strategies that companies choose from when trying to successfully compete within their respective industries. This is the first choice a company must make‚ even before deciding an overall strategy. These generic business strategies include low-cost provider strategy‚ broad differentiation strategy‚ best-cost provider strategy; focused strategy based on low costs‚ and focused strategy based on
Premium Marketing Strategic management Product differentiation