Abstract This project is to identify and analyze HPL (Hansson Private Label ) company’s new investment decisions based on a series of calculations include: Operating Cash Flows (OCF)‚ Net Present Value (NPV)‚ Internal Rate of Return (IRR)‚ and Sensitivity Analysis. The analysis suggests that Hansson should be very cautious regarding the investment proposal that is developed by his manufacturing team. Although the projections and analysis of the project for the next 10 years proposed by Robert Gates
Premium Net present value Cash flow Internal rate of return
in expansion and providing a recommendation to Hansson Private Label‚ Inc. Tucker Hansson‚ the owner of Hansson Private Label‚ is struggling in whether to execute the $50 million investment proposed by his manufacturing team. Under this situation‚ the subject of this report is to evaluate the potential investment of expanding production capacity at Hansson Private Label (HBL) and make a recommendation to Tucker Hansson. In this report‚ I will specifically focus on
Premium Net present value Weighted average cost of capital Investment
Case Study: Hansson Private Label‚ Inc. Executive Summary The owner of Hansson Private Label (HPL) must determine whether or not to accept an aggressive expansion project that would preclude the company from pursuing any alternative investment opportunities for several years. The investment‚ if successful‚ would offer numerous benefits to the company‚ capturing greater market share‚ strengthening relationships with major customers‚ crowding out competition and increasing firm value. Nonetheless
Premium Investment Net present value Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
Vent Consulting Expansion and Risk at Hansson Private Label‚ Inc. Evaluating Investment in the Goliath Facility HBS#4021 Vent Consulting takes pleasure in presenting our Hanson Private Label’s (HPL) capital expansion executive summary. We carefully reviewed all applicable case materials and believe we have quantified your primary risks‚ benefits‚ and most attractive course of action. 1) HPL has performed exceptionally well since inception in 1992. Financial statements show that operating
Premium
this online NPV Calculation Tool http://finance.thinkanddone.com/online-n… we get the following NPV at 15% Net Cash Flows CF0 = -3000000 CF1 = 1100000 CF2 = 1450000 CF3 = 1300000 CF4 = 950000 Discounted Net Cash Flows DCF1 = 1100000/(1+0.15)^1 = 1100000/1.15 = 956521.74 DCF2 = 1450000/(1+0.15)^2 = 1450000/1.3225 = 1096408.32 DCF3 = 1300000/(1+0.15)^3 = 1300000/1.52087 = 854771.1 DCF4 = 950000/(1+0.15)^4 = 950000/1.74901 = 543165.58 NPV Calculation NPV = 956521.74 +
Premium Net present value Internal rate of return Cash flow
within the private label personal care industry? HPL is a major player in private label personal care industry. Private labels hold around 19% (around $4 billion) of personal care industry (around $21.6 billion). HPL holds approximately 28% share of this private label personal care market. Even though HPL is a small player in overall private label market with the revenues of approximately $700 million compared to overall private label market of $70 billion HPL is a major player in private label personal
Premium Personal care Revenue Free cash flow
HANSSON PRIVATE LABEL Objectives: • • • • • Define and derive debt free cash flows Critically analyze the assumptions underlying financial projections Role of opportunity cost of capital in capital budgeting decisions. Calculate NPV and its sensitivity to project variables Alternative methods of project evaluation Overview of Hansson Private Label (HPL): • • • Given the comparable company information‚ HPL ranks mid-pack in terms of revenue. Christine Sinclair and Skin Care Enterprises are more
Premium Net present value Generally Accepted Accounting Principles Corporate finance
Case Study – Project Proposal Case Study for Hansson Private Label‚ Inc.: Evaluating an Investment and Expansion Company profile Hansson Private Label (HPL) started in 1992‚ is the manufacturer of personal care products under the brand label of its retailers. HPL was acquired though a single investment made by Hansson for $42 million ($17million debt and $25 million equity). Revenue in 2007: $681 million HPL estimated share is 28% out of wholesale sales ($2.4 billion) from all manufactures
Premium Risk Investment Decision making
Anastacia Stobbe Merchandising Strategies Tuesdays 12:00 10 December 2012 MACY’S PRIVATE LABELS CASE STUDY There are several private labels and several independent brand labels within Macy’s often amongst each other as a clever marketing technique. However what will attract customers to Macy’s is not the high priced brands but rather their private label brands that often closely mock the established brand style but for a much cheaper price point. People shopping at Macy’s are seeking a deal;
Premium Marketing Brand Price
A brief evaluation of Hanson Private Label (HPL) will reveal signs of an excellent‚ growing‚ and well run company. There are no danger signs within the financials of HPL. The following have seen growth with every passing year: revenue‚ current assets‚ owner’s equity‚ net working capital‚ and sales (even groceries). The following categories have grown every year with the exception of 2005‚ where a higher than usual COGS caused a dip in gross margin – 15% versus a historically high teen’s percentage:
Premium Net present value Capacity utilization Inventory