"Kantianism against ethical egoism and utilitarianism" Essays and Research Papers

Sort By:
Satisfactory Essays
Good Essays
Better Essays
Powerful Essays
Best Essays
Page 10 of 50 - About 500 Essays
  • Better Essays

    Running head: VIRTUE AND EGOISM Virtue and Egoism: Compare and Contrast of Ethical Philosophies Abstract The thesis of this essay is to evaluate the ethical philosophies of virtue and egoism. It will further magnify the similarities and contrasts of each philosophy as the principles have been witnessed from my own experiences‚ both personal and professional. Virtue and Egoism: Compare and Contrast of Ethical Philosophies Moral philosophies have become a cornerstone to developing

    Premium Ethics Morality

    • 1173 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    the main features of Utilitarianism as an ethical theory? (10 marks) Examine and consider criticisms that have been made against Utilitarianism. (10 marks) Utilitarianism is an ethical theory that pivots around the belief that morality should be judged by consequence and the way in which an action can be deemed moral or immoral‚ depends upon the number to which it brings the greatest happiness. A decision can be defined as ethically correct under the theory of Utilitarianism if the moral choice

    Premium Utilitarianism Ethics

    • 2136 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    utilitarion vs kantianism

    • 1099 Words
    • 5 Pages

    PHIL.RLST 2345 EL 10 Bioethics: Human Life Issues Assignment #1 Amanda Secord Ethical Theories and Ethical Tools Utilitarianism versus Kantianism in case study #1: An accident on Makalu The main rule of utilitarianism is to perform the one action that will provide the greatest amount of pleasure and the least amount of pain to the greatest number of people. In our case study‚ one would think the choice is quite easy‚ if we let go of Gary‚ we are providing no happiness

    Premium Utilitarianism

    • 1099 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    had grew due to the influence of Jeremy Bentham; who helped changed the minds of people towards their views and treatment of animals. He had made a case for his perspective on this particular issue by implementing his ethical utilitarianism to animals—and his definition of utilitarianism is “the greatest happiness or greatest felicity principle” (Nietzche 1). Bentham furthers his argument when he made the claim that “our laws should grant animals the right not to be inflicted with suffering” (Fieser

    Premium Meat Livestock Agriculture

    • 1390 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    article discusses utilitarian ethical theory. For a discussion of John Stuart Mill’s essay Utilitarianism (1861)‚ see Utilitarianism (book). The Utilitarianism series‚ part of the Politics series Utilitarian Thinkers[show] Jeremy Bentham John Stuart Mill Henry Sidgwick Peter Singer Forms[show] preference utilitarianism rule utilitarianism act utilitarianism Two-level utilitarianism Total utilitarianism Average utilitarianism Negative utilitarianism animal welfare Abolitionism

    Free Utilitarianism

    • 5761 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Criticisms leveled against Ethical Theories 1. Criticisms leveled against Consequentialism. Consequentialism is based on the consequences of actions. It is sometimes called a teleological theory‚ from the Greek word telos‚ meaning goal. According to consequentialism‚ actions are right or wrong depending on whether their consequences further the goal. The goal (or‚ "the good") can be something like the happiness of all people or the spreading of peace and safety. Anything which contributes to

    Premium Rights Social contract Law

    • 8490 Words
    • 34 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism

    • 1278 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Paper #1 In A Critique of Utilitarianism‚ Bernard Williams argues that when following a Utilitarian approach for moral dilemmas‚ Utilitarianism might have us sacrifice or modify our moral integrity. Williams explains this argument with a hypothetical execution situation with protagonist Jim. Jim‚ who is a botanical expeditionary‚ accidentally wanders in the central square of a small South American town. There‚ he finds twenty Indians tied up in a row‚ with several armed soldiers standing in front

    Premium Morality Ethics Immanuel Kant

    • 1278 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    subjective cause and hence will not be influenced by subjective inclinations. Therefore‚ this is the only aspect which humans cannot manipulate as a means to obtain what they want. And in Kant’s perspective‚ possession of a good will is not considered ethical‚ because contained with in good will are empirical aspects such as emotions and passions‚ and the will itself is of worldly inclinations‚ not reason. All actions that are made from logic and reason are then grouped into four categories: actions that

    Premium Morality Religion Ethics

    • 1797 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Psychological Egoism

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Psychological egoism claims that people do only act in their self-interest. Ethical egoism is the normative ethical stance that people ought to do what is in their self-interest. Although similar‚ the two beliefs are not compatible because ethical egoism‚ in order to be significant‚ must claim that people can be altruistic; otherwise it would make no sense to say that people should be selfish. Neither philosophy is very good‚ though. Both have very big problems. A major problem with psychological

    Free Ethical egoism Egoism Ayn Rand

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism

    • 1637 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Where do you draw the line on what is right? Ethical theories are something that have been tossed around between people for years. The dispute over what is right or wrong is endless and has many ways of reaching an answer. Each of these theories that arise has both its benefits and drawbacks. No one theory can be perfect and fit everyone’s needs. For a theory to be successful it needs to have supporters. For it to have supporters people need to believe in it. For people to believe in it‚ it

    Premium Decision making Ethics

    • 1637 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
Page 1 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 50