3.2 Agency An agent is a person authorized to negotiate and enter into contracts on behalf of another who is known as the principal in his dealings with a third party. The legal relationship between an agent and a principal is an agency. For examples‚ between a client as a principal (P) and lawyer as an agent(A)‚ employer (P) and employee (A)‚ house owner (P) and housing agent (A) and others. The principal and the agent are in an employment contract where the terms of appointment and authority have
Premium Contract Contract Contract law
PART A: This problem is a straight forward problem in judicial review and prerogative remedies. Judicial review can be done through Prerogative orders. Judicial review refers to the Court’s review of a lower or administrative body’s factual or legal findings[1]. Prerogative remedies are remedies which if not always are designed from the first for the control of governmental duties and powers‚ have long been used for the purpose especially[2]. These remedies are such as certiorari‚ mandamus
Premium Administrative law Supreme Court of the United States Court
Habeas Corpus: Case studies INTRODUCTION The right of personal liberty is guaranteed by Article 21 which says‚ ‘no person shall be deprived of his life or personal liberty except according to procedure established by law.’ The writ of habeas corpus has nonetheless long been celebrated as the most efficient safeguard of the right to personal liberty. The jurist Albert Venn Dicey wrote that the British Habeas Corpus Acts "declare no principle and define no rights‚ but they are for practical
Premium Habeas corpus Supreme Court of the United States Common law
shown in the case of Francovich6‚ which produced indirect effect through the co-operation of the ECJ and the national courts. This doctrine is vital for the development of the system of remedies‚ which subvert around the restrictions of the strict locus standi requirements of direct actions. The preliminary reference procedure represents half of the European Court of Justice’s (ECJ) given
Premium European Union European Union law Court of Justice of the European Union
AN ASSIGNMENT ON: JUDICIAL REVIEW IN INDIA AND THE U.S.A. SUBMITTED BY: SUDESHNA AKANKSHA PANDA 1ST YEAR 2ND SEMESTER KIIT LAW SCHOOL CONTENTS PAGES 1. The meaning of Judicial Review ……………………………..3 2. The origin of Judicial Review …………………………………4 3. Judicial Review in India………………………………………..9 4. Judicial Review in the U.S.A.………………………………….18 5. Conclusion…………………………………………….………
Premium United States Constitution Supreme Court of the United States
The area of law in which this question is concerned is judicial review. Judicial review can be defined as ‘… the means by which the Courts control the exercise of Governmental powers.’ The Courts will look at the way in which a decision was made‚ not the decision itself‚ to find out if any powers have been abused. Judicial review is an application to the Courts to assess an action or decision made by a public body on a point of public law. A particular decision may be found to be in breach of natural
Premium Law
Jus‚ ibi remedium’ ; the concept of ‘jurisdiction of a court’ and the types of jurisdiction of a court ; Civil Law‚ Criminal Law and their distinctions and distinctive features ; Some basic legal concepts / principles such as: the Doctrines of Locus Standi and Public Interest litigation (PIL) ; the Law of Limitation ; The Principles of Natural Justice: (a) The Rule against Bias ; (b) The Rule of Fair Hearing ; Exceptions to the Rules of Natural Justice. 2 & 3 BL-Module No. 2 : Contract
Premium Contract Law Contract law
The Companies Act 2006 which received Royal Assent in November 2006 consists of 1300 sections and is the thought to be the single largest piece of legislation ever made. This Act restates and replaces most of the company law provisions brought in by the previous Acts. The 2006 Act introduces an extensive range of changes to areas of company law such as the formation of a company‚ directors’ duties and liabilities‚ members/shareholders rights and share capital maintenance. Although the majority
Premium Company
UNIVERSITY OF HERTFORDSHIRE SCHOOL OF LAW COURSEWORK FOR (MARITIME LAW ) AUTHOR - ( FARADILA BINTI ROSLAN; 11605537 ) DATE - (20TH FEBRUARY 2012 ) SEMINAR GROUP - (-) SEMINAR TUTOR - ( DR. ARDESHIR ATAI ) SCHEME - (LLMF1) “Where the action is undefended‚ it used to be the case that any judgment would be limited to the value of the res itself. In the light of the reasoning of the House of Lords in The Indian Grace (No. 2)‚ to the effect that‚ after service of in rem proceedings
Premium Common law Law Latin legal phrases
strongest)ground)whereas)[insert)possible)ground])is)weak.)) ! ) " 0)Page)2)of)20)0) Nicholas)Tong)Wei)Jie) ) LOCUS"STANDI"&"REMEDIES" LOCUS)STANDI) Whether"A"(individual)"has"locus"standi" On) the) facts‚) A) appears) to) have) “sufficient”) interest) in) the) matter) because) of) the) potential) abuse) of) power) by) [BODY]) or) because) he) is) interested)in)the)legality)of)the)order)(Colin&Chan&v&MITA))) ) Whether"NGO"has"locus"standi" Public) interest) suits) are) generally) allowed) in) UK) (ex& p& World& Development&
Premium Law