Conformity and Obedience Task: outline and evaluate findings from conformity and obedience research and consider explanations for conformity (and non-conformity)‚ as well as evaluating Milgram’s studies of obedience (including ethical issues). The following essay will be about understanding what is meant by and distinguishing the differences between the terms conformity and obedience. It will show the evaluation of two key psychological studies which seek to explain why people do and do not conform
Premium Stanford prison experiment Milgram experiment
to prove that individuals would obey with the request of authority figures. McLeod in his summary states‚ “Milgram was interested in researching how far people would go in obeying an instruction if it involved harming another person. Stanley Milgram was interested in how easily ordinary people could be influenced into committing atrocities for example‚ Germans in WWII.” (McLeod‚ The Milgram Experiment‚ 2007) The experiment was carried out by asking participants/teachers to deliver a series of electrical
Premium Psychology Milgram experiment Nazi Germany
Stanley Milgram was an extremely famous psychologist who was best known for his groundbreaking experiment on the subject of obedience during the 1960s. Milgram began his career as a psychologist just around the time that the horrifying truth of the concentration camps came out. The fact that almost an entire nation obeyed one man‚ who commanded them to do inhumane and grotesque acts to other human beings intrigued Stanley Milgram. He became even more interested when he began watching the trial of
Premium Nazi Germany Adolf Hitler The Holocaust
December 11‚ 2012 PSY 1012-Introduction to Psychology Professor Balkaran HOFLING HOSPITAL EXPERIMENT In 1966‚ the psychiatrist Charles K. Hofling conducted a two-part experiment that was inspired by Milgram’s research in obedience (Milgram‚ S.‚ 1963 & 1965). It consisted of a survey and field study on obedience in the nurse-physician relationship. Primarily‚ what happens when nurses are required to carry out a procedure which goes against her professional standards and secondly
Premium Milgram experiment Social psychology Nursing
Stanley Milgram’s (1963) Obedience study is widely known in the field of psychology. This study is particularly distinct because the findings of the study were surprising to public and ethical procedure of the study was controversial. Stanley Milgram (1963) conducted this particular experimented to examine the how far individuals obey an authority. His goal was to find an explanation of Natzi killings in World War II. He recruited male participants through newspaper advertising. The participants
Premium Stanford prison experiment Psychology Milgram experiment
Obedience and Authority Yale psychologist Stanley Milgram wrote an article‚ "The Perils of Obedience‚" which documented his unique experiment about obedience and authority. The purpose was to observe to what extent an ordinary citizen would compromise his or her conscience when ordered to inflict increasing pain to another human. The experiment consisted of three people: a teacher and learner chosen at random‚ and a scientist. Once all three were acquainted‚ the scientist explained that the goal
Premium Stanford prison experiment Milgram experiment Psychology
psychology by the name of Stanley Milgram‚ he created this experiment on how being in the presents of an authority figures would affect the way people behaved. This study was conducted in July 1969‚ just one year after the trial of Eichmann in Jerusalem. Milgram developed this experiment to answer the question "Could it be that Eichmann and his millions of accomplices in the Holocaust were just following orders? Could we call them all accomplices?" (The Milgram Experiment by Saul McLeod published
Premium Milgram experiment Stanford prison experiment Social psychology
Indecisive disobedience occurs when the individuals in the experiment try to disobey in different ways‚ but they were ineffective at it. I believe that the Milgram experiment was more about indecisive disobedience‚ rather than destructive obedience. The subjects of Milgram’s experiment were consciously aware that what they were doing was wrong‚ since it brought great pain to the “learner‚” but because they were instructed by a legitimate authority to continue the experience‚ they obeyed the experimenter
Premium
e.g.‚ Stanley Milgram‚ 1963; Thomas Blass‚ 2012) seem more likely to infer that obedience to destructive authority is a cultural universal—a trait that all human beings have‚ regardless of their culture. In his article” Behavioral Study of Obedience”‚ Stanley Milgram (1963) offered an analysis of how authority may influence obedience. The purpose of the study was to provide the readers with criteria for obedience in order to explain why people obey to destructive authority. Milgram (1963) conducted
Premium Social psychology Milgram experiment Psychology
Stanley Milligram experience was created to understand the physiological boundaries of people concerning their morals and their better judgment; whether under the direct authority or not. The objective of the experiment was to gauge how individuals respond to having the authority and carrying out duties per their job requirements‚ regardless if it affects their morals or way of life. Stanley‚ the culmination of his experiment people abide by and be in agreement out of fear when they under pressure
Premium Ethics Milgram experiment Stanford prison experiment