Milgram experiment tells us about human and obedience. Humans are socially adapted to the society they live in and obedience is when a group humans follows the rule no matter wrong or right. Humans are usually obedient in most situations. That is due to teachings they receive. For example‚ when Hitler was killing groups of people‚ it was wrong; but the group of authority just listen to him and followed the rules. This situation was wrong and harmful but it was something that they just followed because
Premium Morality Human Crime
is related to one’s assimilation into a total institution in regards to what he calls the “privilege system”. While the playground social setting is only for play‚ and therefore not a total institution‚ the same theories of using “house rules”‚ privileges‚ and punishments² to gain obedience could be applied. While I did not see any specific examples of it happening‚ it is likely that children understood a set of rules they were to follow at the park‚ whether their caretaker told them before they got
Premium Family Family Milgram experiment
I think the Milgram and Zimbardo’s results is a good theory for the Holocaust. When the two‚ Instructor and Student‚ were in role play for every wrong answer the instructor would shock the student. At times when the instructor would say‚ “I don’t want to do this” or “I can’t do this” shows he does have a consequence‚ but he continued to still push the trigger. Although it was just an actor playing the role and no one was being shocked it is terrible to see how he continued to go on with the test
Premium Morality Jury Thought
The Stanley Milgram experiment takes normal everyday people and gives them orders to do horrible things. The test is to see if someone would do an awful act just on the basis of someone telling them to. This experiment speaks to the ’nature of responsibility’ and to see if the subject will stop the experiment due to its dangerous nature. The subject is tricked into thinking they are the teacher‚ and the other person in the room‚ an actor‚ is the learner. The teacher will ask the learner a series
Premium Education Psychology Milgram experiment
The Milgram Experiment Milgram experiment was conducted at 1962 by Psychologist Stanley Milgram at Yale University. This experiment focused on how people will behave when their moral senses are conflicting with the authority. This experiment measured if people will obey authority or stand up what they believe for when their morals are challenged by a person with a greater social figure. These people who participated in the experiment were males in ages between twenty and forty. The volunteers were
Premium Education Psychology Teacher
significant role in broadening and providing an understanding into the function of human behaviour. Many studies using an experimental method‚ have been pivotal in aiding this understanding from Milgram’s Obedience Study to Harlow’s study of attachment. An Experimental method intends to prove a theory (hypothesis) of an experimenter by manipulating different variables to see what outcome these have on the results. The hypotheses are an educated guess as to what manipulating the variables will do to the
Premium Scientific method Science Experiment
psychologist named Stanley Milgram conducted an experiment that concentrated in understanding “destructive obedience”. Milgram’s interest in researching “destructive obedience” came from the Holocaust. “Obedience is the psychological mechanism that links individual action to political purpose”. Milgram’s experiment proposed that the murder of innocent people occurred because of the obedience from the soldiers to their leader. The experiment focuses on analyzing on why the degree of obedience from each subject
Premium Psychology Stanford prison experiment
Outline and Evaluate Milgrams Study of Obedience (12 marks) . Milgram after advertising for volunteer participants were paid on arrival at the laboratory for their time. Participants‚ believing they were taking part in a memory experiment‚ were introduced in pairs to the experimenter where they ‘decided’ who was to be either a ‘teacher’ or a ‘learner’. In reality one of the ‘pairs’ of participants was a confederate and the chances were rigged so that the real participant was always the ‘teacher’
Premium Milgram experiment Shock
Milgram (1963) claimed that destructive obedience is not a consequence of moral weakness or an evil character; rather it is a response to a particular set of situational factors. Evaluate this statement. In order to evaluate this statement it is important to first understand what Milgram meant. This essay will first consider what is meant by destructive obedience and briefly look at Milgram’s work. It will then look at what is inferred by situational factors‚ focusing on conformity‚ socialisation
Premium Milgram experiment Stanford prison experiment Psychology
CONFORMITY AND OBEDIENCE Barbara Fellows Grand Canyon University January 9‚ 2013 Conformity and Obedience Comprehending the essence of obedience and disobedience has been an interest for many researchers‚ psychologists and scientists. Multiple observations have been administered to assist in understanding such issues and the impact employed by outside factors on individuals within the decision making channels. Neglecting obedience can be as hazardous as neglecting revolution in any society;
Premium Sociology Social psychology Psychology