Phaedo‚ written by Plato is the interpreted dialogues between Socrates‚ a major philosopher‚ as well as some others including Cebes‚ Simmias‚ and Echerates. The overall idea of the book is Socrates trying to convince his colleagues of his theories‚ which explains the fundamental argument that the soul is immortal. Since Socrates is introducing such unheard of ideas‚ and seeming to be challenging beliefs‚ he is sentenced to death. While awaiting his fate‚ Socrates asks only one thing of his colleagues
Premium Socrates Plato Philosophy
Phaedo‚ a story written by Plato‚ is actually an account of how the death of Socrates went about. This fictitious story written from Phaedo’s point of view is used by Plato to detail his ideas of life and death‚ but through the perspective of Socrates on his final day. By emphasizing that in fact Plato was not there when this happened‚ he makes it clear that this is his speculation and not a true story. Nevertheless‚ there is a lot to learn about Socrates’ (and Plato’s) idea of the soul from this
Premium Socrates Plato Philosophy
Nam Le Phil 210 9/22/09 Phaedo 1. a) 60b: Socrates remarks that pain and pleasure may seem to be opposites since we never experience both at the same time‚ but they are intimately connected to one another. Rarely‚ do we find one without the other. The pleasure that he experiences from being released from his chains is directly related to the pain that he experienced from being enchained. b) 67b: Death is the separation of the soul from the body. We shall be closest to knowledge (in
Premium Socrates Plato Soul
The Phaedo is a story that is set on the last day of Socrates ’ life. The dialogue examines whether the human soul is immortal or not. Socrates does not fear death‚ but he looks it straight in the eye and thinks this is what a philosopher practices for. Socrates believes that the soul is immortal‚ and therefore‚ outlasts the body. Socrates defends his argument by trying to establish that things come to be from their opposite. In his argument‚ he implies that all things that can change are eternal
Premium Soul Death Life
up throughout these dialogues‚ it is sometimes difficult to see how his remarks fit together into a logical scheme. An appreciation of his values and worldviews can help us understand both his lifestyle and his behavior in the Apology‚ Republic‚ Phaedo and Crito. There are important differences between how the ancient Greeks viewed ethics and how most people view it today. The Greek word ethos‚ from which we derive our word ethics‚’ means habit.’ Consequently‚ the central ethical question
Premium Plato Ethics Aristotle
Phaedo Philosophy is a vast field. It examines and probes many different fields. Virtue‚ morality‚ immortality‚ death‚ and the difference between the psyche (soul) and the soma (body) are just a few of the many different topics which can be covered under the umbrella of philosophy. Philosophers are supposed to be experts on all these subjects. The have well thought out opinions‚ and they are very learned people. Among the most revered philosophers of all time was Socrates. Living around
Premium Philosophy Plato Socrates
true wisdom‚ then the philosopher ought to be cheerful in the face of death because he is about to gain the everlasting reward. To begin‚ I would like to state emphatically that by my understanding and reasoning‚ I agree with Socrates’ argument in Phaedo‚ which points to the fact that the philosopher “should be cheerful in the face of death”. This paper will then go on to show why I think what he says holds water and why I agree with him. In 64a‚ Socrates tells Simmias and Cebes that people who
Premium Plato Heaven Afterlife
Why does Plato think that the soul is immortal? Is he right? Discuss with close reference to Phaedo 102a-107b. The Phaedo is Plato’s attempt to convince the reader of the immortality of the soul using four main arguments. These include the argument of affinity‚ recollection‚ Forms and the law of opposites. In the final passage of the Phaedo‚ (Grube‚ 2002:102a-107b)‚ Plato provides his ‘Final Proof’‚ despite seeming like the most conclusive argument it is not necessarily the most convincing. Plato
Premium Soul Life Socrates
Plato presupposes that there exist two kinds of things: Forms and particulars (Phaedo‚103). To explain‚ Plato’s Forms are comparable to for example‚ hot things‚ cold things‚ beautiful things‚ amongst others. What every hot‚ cold‚ or beautiful thing has in common with other hot‚ cold‚beautiful things‚ are that they share in the Forms
Premium Equality Inequality Discrimination
One such argument for Plato was the argument for knowledge as recollection‚ as stated in the Phaedo: “[…] recollection is most commonly a process of recovering that which has already been forgotten through time and inattention.”1 Drawing from this argument‚ Plato suggests that anything which is known of the immaterial world of forms must have been
Premium Plato Soul Mind